Peripheral arterial disease and diabetes: effects on endothelial progenitor cell differentiation and nitric oxide metabolism

In the recent years it is emerged that peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has become a growing health problem in Western countries. This is a progressive manifestation of atherothrombotic vascular disease, which results into the narrowing of the blood vessels of the lower limbs and, as final consequence, in critical leg ischemia. PAD often occurs along with other cardiovascular risk factors, including diabetes mellitus (DM), low-grade inflammation, hypertension, and lipid disorders. Patients with DM have an increased risk of developing PAD, and that risk increases with the duration of DM. Moreover, there is a growing population of patients identified with insulin resistance (IR), impaired glucose tolerance, and obesity, a pathological condition known as “metabolic syndrome”, which presents increased cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis is the earliest symptom of PAD and is a dynamic and progressive disease arising from the combination of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. Endothelial dysfunction is a broad term that implies diminished production or availability of nitric oxide (NO) and/or an imbalance in the relative contribution of endothelium-derived relaxing factors. The secretion of these agents is considerably reduced in association with the major risks of atherosclerosis, especially hyperglycaemia and diabetes, and a reduced vascular repair has been observed in response to wound healing and to ischemia. Neovascularization does not only rely on the proliferation of local endothelial cells, but also involves bone marrow-derived stem cells, referred to as endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), since they exhibit endothelial surface markers and properties. They can promote postnatal vasculogenesis by homing to, differentiating into an endothelial phenotype, proliferating and incorporating into new vessels. Consequently, EPCs are critical to endothelium maintenance and repair and their dysfunction contributes to vascular disease. The aim of this study has been the characterization of EPCs from healthy peripheral blood, in terms of proliferation, differentiation and function. Given the importance of NO in neovascularization and homing process, it has been investigated the expression of NO synthase (NOS) isoforms, eNOS, nNOS and iNOS, and the effects of their inhibition on EPC function. Moreover, it has been examined the expression of NADPH oxidase (Nox) isoforms which are the principal source of ROS in the cell. In fact, a number of evidences showed the correlation between ROS and NO metabolism, since oxidative stress causes NOS inactivation via enzyme uncoupling. In particular, it has been studied the expression of Nox2 and Nox4, constitutively expressed in endothelium, and Nox1. The second part of this research was focused on the study of EPCs under pathological conditions. Firstly, EPCs isolated from healthy subject were cultured in a hyperglycaemic medium, in order to evaluate the effects of high glucose concentration on EPCs. Secondly, EPCs were isolated from the peripheral blood of patients affected with PAD, both diabetic or not, and it was assessed their capacity to proliferate, differentiate, and to participate to neovasculogenesis. Furthermore, it was investigated the expression of NOS and Nox in these cells. Mononuclear cells isolated from peripheral blood of healthy patients, if cultured under differentiating conditions, differentiate into EPCs. These cells are not able to form capillary-like structures ex novo, but participate to vasculogenesis by incorporation into the new vessels formed by mature endothelial cells, such as HUVECs. With respect to NOS expression, these cells have high levels of iNOS, the inducible isoform of NOS, 3-4 fold higher than in HUVECs. While the endothelial isoform, eNOS, is poorly expressed in EPCs. The higher iNOS expression could be a form of compensation of lower eNOS levels. Under hyperglycaemic conditions, both iNOS and eNOS expression are enhanced compared to control EPCs, as resulted from experimental studies in animal models. In patients affected with PAD, the EPCs may act in different ways. Non-diabetic patients and diabetic patients with a higher vascular damage, evidenced by a higher number of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), show a reduced proliferation and ability to participate to vasculogenesis. On the other hand, diabetic patients with lower CEC number have proliferative and vasculogenic capacity more similar to healthy EPCs. eNOS levels in both patient types are equivalent to those of control, while iNOS expression is enhanced. Interestingly, nNOS is not detected in diabetic patients, analogously to other cell types in diabetics, which show a reduced or no nNOS expression. Concerning Nox expression, EPCs present higher levels of both Nox1 and Nox2, in comparison with HUVECs, while Nox4 is poorly expressed, probably because of uncompleted differentiation into an endothelial phenotype. Nox1 is more expressed in PAD patients, diabetic or not, than in controls, suggesting an increased ROS production. Nox2, instead, is lower in patients than in controls. Being Nox2 involved in cellular response to VEGF, its reduced expression can be referable to impaired vasculogenic potential of PAD patients.

Insulin and TOR pathways regulate cellular and organismal growth through the myc oncogene in Drosophila

A large body of literature documents in both mice and Drosophila the involvement of Insulin pathway in growth regulation, probably due to its role in glucose and lipid import, nutrient storage, and translation of RNAs implicated in ribosome biogenesis (Vanhaesebroeck et al. 2001). Moreover several lines of evidence implicate this pathway as a causal factor in cancer (Sale, 2008; Zeng and Yee 2007; Hursting et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2008). With regards to Myc, studies in cell culture have implied this family of transcription factors as regulators of the cell cycle that are rapidly induced in response to growth factors. Myc is a potent oncogene, rearranged and overexpressed in a wide range of human tumors and necessary during development. Its conditional knock-out in mice results in reduction of body weight due to defect in cell proliferation (Trumpp et al. 2001). Evidence from in vivo studies in Drosophila and mammals suggests a critical function for myc in cell growth regulation (Iritani and Eisenman 1999; Johnston et al. 1999; Kim et al. 2000; de Alboran et al. 2001; Douglas et al. 2001). This role is supported by our analysis of Myc target genes in Drosophila, which include genes involved in RNA binding, processing, ribosome biogenesis and nucleolar function (Orain et al 2003, Bellosta et al., 2005, Hulf et al, 2005). The fact that Insulin signaling and Myc have both been associated with growth control suggests that they may interact with each other. However, genetic evidence suggesting that Insulin signaling regulates Myc in vivo is lacking. In this work we were able to show, for the first time, a direct modulation of dMyc in response to Insulin stimulation/silencing both in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that dMyc up-regulation in response to DILPs signaling occurs both at the mRNA and potein level. We believe dMyc protein accumulation after Insulin signaling activation is conditioned to AKT-dependent GSK3β/sgg inactivation. In fact, we were able to demonstate that dMyc protein stabilization through phosphorylation is a conserved feature between Drosophila and vertebrates and requires multiple events. The final phosphorylation step, that results in a non-stable form of dMyc protein, ready to be degraded by the proteasome, is performed by GSK3β/sgg kinase (Sears, 2004). At the same time we demonstrated that CKI family of protein kinase are required to prime dMyc phosphorylation. DILPs and TOR/Nutrient signalings are known to communicate at several levels (Neufeld, 2003). For this reason we further investigated TOR contribution to dMyc-dependent growth regulation. dMyc protein accumulates in S2 cells after aminoacid stimulation, while its mRNA does not seem to be affected upon TORC1 inhibition, suggesting that the Nutrient pathway regulates dMyc mostly post-transcriptionally. In support to this hypothesis, we observed a TORC1-dependent GSK3β/sgg inactivation, further confirming a synergic effect of DILPs and Nutrients on dMyc protein stability. On the other hand, our data show that Rheb but not S6K, both downstream of the TOR kinase, contributes to the dMyc-induced growth of the eye tissue, suggesting that Rheb controls growth independently of S6K.. Moreover, Rheb seems to be able to regulate organ size during development inducing cell death, a mechanism no longer occurring in absence of dmyc. These observations suggest that Rheb might control growth through a new pathway independent of TOR/S6K but still dependent on dMyc. In order to dissect the mechanism of dMyc regulation in response to these events, we analyzed the relative contribution of Rheb, TOR and S6K to dMyc expression, biochemically in S2 cells and in vivo in morphogenetic clones and we further confirmed an interplay between Rheb and Myc that seems to be indipendent from TOR. In this work we clarified the mechanisms that stabilize dMyc protein in vitro and in vivo and we observed for the first time dMyc responsiveness to DILPs and TOR. At the same time, we discovered a new branch of the Nutrient pathway that appears to drive growth through dMyc but indipendently from TOR. We believe our work shed light on the mechanisms cells use to grow or restrain growth in presence/absence of growth promoting cues and for this reason it contributes to understand the physiology of growth control.