A SMO inhibitor drug reduces the progenitor cell's maintenance in the Drosophila hematopoietic organ: a novel model to study Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia relapse

The chronic myeloid leukemia complexity and the difficulties of disease eradication have recently led to the development of drugs which, together with the inhibitors of TK, could eliminate leukemia stem cells preventing the occurrence of relapses in patients undergoing transplantation. The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway positively regulates the self-renewal and the maintenance of leukemic stem cells and not, and this function is evolutionarily conserved. Using Drosophila as a model, we studied the efficacy of the SMO inhibitor drug that inhibit the human protein Smoothened (SMO). SMO is a crucial component in the signal transduction of Hh and its blockade in mammals leads to a reduction in the disease induction. Here we show that administration of the SMO inhibitor to animals has a specific effect directed against the Drosophila ortholog protein, causing loss of quiescence and hematopoietic precursors mobilization. The SMO inhibitor induces in L3 larvae the appearance of melanotic nodules generated as response by Drosophila immune system to the increase of its hemocytes. The same phenotype is induced even by the dsRNA:SMO specific expression in hematopoietic precursors of the lymph gland. The drug action is also confirmed at cellular level. The study of molecular markers has allowed us to demonstrate that SMO inhibitor leads to a reduction of the quiescent precursors and to an increase of the differentiated cells. Moreover administering the inhibitor to heterozygous for a null allele of Smo, we observe a significant increase in the phenotype penetrance compared to administration to wild type animals. This helps to confirm the specific effect of the drug itself. These data taken together indicate that the study of inhibitors of Smo in Drosophila can represent a useful way to dissect their action mechanism at the molecular-genetic level in order to collect information applicable to the studies of the disease in humans.

A phase II, single arm study of CarbopLatin plus Etoposide with Bevacizumab and Atezolizumab in patients with exTEnded-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) – CeLEBrATE trial

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor diagnosed at extended disease SCLC (ES-SCLC) stage in about 70% of cases. The new standard of treatment for patients with ES-SCLC is a combination of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy and atezolizumab or durvalumab, two programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (mAb). However, the benefit derived from the addition of PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy in ES-SCLC was limited and restricted to a subset of patients. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most important pro-angiogenic factor implicated in cancer angiogenesis, which is abundant in SCLC and associated with poor prognosis. Antiangiogenic agents, such as bevacizumab, a humanized mAb against VEGF, added to platinum-etoposide chemotherapy improved progression-free survival in SCLC in two trials, but it did not translate into a benefit in overall survival. Nevertheless, VEGF has also acts as a mediator of an immunosuppressive microenvironment and its inhibition can revert the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment and potentially enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies. Based on available preclinical data, we hypothesized that VEGF inhibition by bevacizumab could improve atezolizumab efficacy in a synergistic way and designed a phase II single-arm trial of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC. The trial, which is still ongoing, enrolled 53 patients, including those with treated or untreated asymptomatic brain metastases (provided criteria are met), who received atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin and etoposide for 4-6 cycles (induction phase), followed by maintenance with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for a maximum of 18 total cycles or until disease progression, patient refusal, unacceptable toxicity. The evaluation of efficacy of the experimental combination in terms of 1-year overall survival rate is not yet mature (primary objective of the trial). The combination was feasible and the toxicity profile manageable (secondary objective of the trial).