La circolazione dei servizi in una economia sociale di mercato

Questa ricerca intende esaminare l'impatto della circolazione transfrontaliera dei servizi sul bilanciamento tra regole di mercato e politiche sociali. L'analisi di questa tensione costituisce il punto di partenza per una riflessione più ampia che si propone di comprendere come la conciliazione tra solidarietà e competitività e, più generalmente, tra esigenze di protezione sociale degli Stati membri e tradizionali competenze comunitarie nell'ambito del mercato comune, possa operare nel settore dei servizi. Un mercato comune dei servizi in costante espansione in senso transfrontaliero ha indubbiamente effetti non trascurabili sul piano sociale ed in particolare sul diritto del lavoro consolidatosi nelle tradizioni costituzionali degli Stati membri. La necessità di conciliare solidarietà e competitività alla base del concetto di economia sociale ed il rinnovato accento sulla dimensione sociale dell'Unione accolto nel Trattato di Lisbona dovrebbero promuovere una convivenza armoniosa tra un'integrazione europea di carattere principalmente economico ed i residui spazi di intervento statale a tutela dei mercati nazionali del lavoro. Prima di analizzare cause ed effetti di tale potenziale conflitto nell'ambito del mercato europeo dei servizi risulta necessario fornire un panorama del quadro normativo applicabile agli operatori economici che intendano fornire a titolo temporaneo una prestazione in uno Stato membro diverso da quello di stabilimento. Nell'ambito di tale disamina, dedicata alle fonti conflittuali del diritto europeo applicabili ai prestatori di servizi, individueremo le condizioni che devono rispettare gli operatori per esercitare un'attività in uno Stato membro diverso da quello di origine (Parte I). Potremo quindi illustrare come l'esercizio delle libertà comunitarie di circolazione da parte delle imprese europee abbia fatto emergere le contraddizioni ed i limiti del funzionamento del mercato comune rispetto alla fruizione dei diritti sociali da parte dei lavoratori locali e distaccati (Parte II).

Fighting corruption with pyramids: A Law and Economics approach to combating corruption in post-socialist countries

Corruption is, in the last two decades, considered as one of the biggest problems within the international community, which harms not only a particular state or society but the whole world. The discussion on corruption in law and economics approach is mainly run under the veil of Public choice theory and principal-agent model. Based on this approach the strong international initiatives taken by the UN, the OECD and the Council of Europe, provided various measures and tools in order to support and guide countries in their combat against corruption. These anti-corruption policies created a repression -prevention-transparency model for corruption combat. Applying this model, countries around the world adopted anti-corruption strategies as part of their legal rules. Nevertheless, the recent researches on the effects of this move show non impressive results. Critics argue that “one size does not fit all” because the institutional setting of countries around the world varies. Among the countries which experience problems of corruption, even though they follow the dominant anti-corruption trends, are transitional, post-socialist countries. To this group belong the countries which are emerging from centrally planned to an open market economy. The socialist past left traces on institutional setting, mentality of the individuals and their interrelation, particularly in the domain of public administration. If the idiosyncrasy of these countries is taken into account the suggestion in this thesis is that in public administration in post-socialist countries, instead of dominant anti-corruption scheme repression-prevention-transparency, corruption combat should be improved through the implementation of a new one, structure-conduct-performance. The implementation of this model is based on three regulatory pyramids: anti-corruption, disciplinary anti-corruption and criminal anti-corruption pyramid. This approach asks public administration itself to engage in corruption combat, leaving criminal justice system as the ultimate weapon, used only for the very harmful misdeeds.

Abusing data dominance in the digital market. The application of merger control and article 102 TFEU to data-related conducts.

The internet and digital technologies revolutionized the economy. Regulating the digital market has become a priority for the European Union. While promoting innovation and development, EU institutions must assure that the digital market maintains a competitive structure. Among the numerous elements characterizing the digital sector, users’ data are particularly important. Digital services are centered around personal data, the accumulation of which contributed to the centralization of market power in the hands of a few large providers. As a result, data-driven mergers and data-related abuses gained a central role for the purposes of EU antitrust enforcement. In light of these considerations, this work aims at assessing whether EU competition law is well-suited to address data-driven mergers and data-related abuses of dominance. These conducts are of crucial importance to the maintenance of competition in the digital sector, insofar as the accumulation of users’ data constitutes a fundamental competitive advantage. To begin with, part 1 addresses the specific features of the digital market and their impact on the definition of the relevant market and the assessment of dominance by antitrust authorities. Secondly, part 2 analyzes the EU’s case law on data-driven mergers to verify if merger control is well-suited to address these concentrations. Thirdly, part 3 discusses abuses of dominance in the phase of data collection and the legal frameworks applicable to these conducts. Fourthly, part 4 focuses on access to “essential” datasets and the indirect effects of anticompetitive conducts on rivals’ ability to access users’ information. Finally, Part 5 discusses differential pricing practices implemented online and based on personal data. As it will be assessed, the combination of an efficient competition law enforcement and the auspicial adoption of a specific regulation seems to be the best solution to face the challenges raised by “data-related dominance”.