Evaluation of Antitumoral activity of bone targeted drugs/conventional chemotherapies and identification of biomarkers for the selection of patients with breast cancer for the bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting

Bone metastases are responsible for different clinical complications defined as skeletal-related events (SREs) such as pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, bone marrow infiltration and severe bone pain requiring palliative radiotherapy. The general aim of these three years research period was to improve the management of patients with bone metastases through two different approaches of translational research. Firstly in vitro preclinical tests were conducted on breast cancer cells and on indirect co-colture of cancer cells and osteoclasts to evaluate bone targeted therapy singly and in combination with conventional chemotherapy. The study suggests that zoledronic acid has an antitumor activity in breast cancer cell lines. Its mechanism of action involves the decrease of RAS and RHO, as in osteoclasts. Repeated treatment enhances antitumor activity compared to non-repeated treatment. Furthermore the combination Zoledronic Acid + Cisplatin induced a high antitumoral activity in the two triple-negative lines MDA-MB-231 and BRC-230. The p21, pMAPK and m-TOR pathways were regulated by this combined treatment, particularly at lower Cisplatin doses. A co-colture system to test the activity of bone-targeted molecules on monocytes-breast conditioned by breast cancer cells was also developed. Another important criticism of the treatment of breast cancer patients, is the selection of patients who will benefit of bone targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. A retrospective case-control study on breast cancer patients to find new predictive markers of bone metastases in the primary tumors was performed. Eight markers were evaluated and TFF1 and CXCR4 were found to discriminate between patients with relapse to bone respect to patients with no evidence of disease. In particular TFF1 was the most accurate marker reaching a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 79%. This marker could be a useful tool for clinicians to select patients who could benefit for bone targeted therapy in adjuvant setting.

Involvement of microRNAs in Androgen Receptor-dependent Breast Cancers

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a very aggressive tumor subtype characterized by the lack of expression of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), due in the most of cases to an increased expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and hypermethylation in CpG islands, resulting in gene silencing. Furthermore, in ESR1- negative breast cancers, androgen receptor (AR) is highly expressed and some studies suggest that it can drive tumor progression and might represent a therapeutic target. A correlation between microRNAs, small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression, and DNMTs was investigated in a TNBC cell line to restore a normal methylation pattern of ESR1, leading to its re-expression and conferring again sensitivity to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). miR-148A and miR-29B were found to be involved in the reduction of the expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3A and in a slight increase of ESR1 expression, but not at protein level. Then, we found a down-regulation of AR by miRs-7, -9, -27a, -27b, -29a, -29b, -29c, -127-3p, -127-5p and -376 at 48h post transfection and an up-regulation by miR-15a and miR-16 at every time considered. We concomitantly investigated a possible increase of Tamoxifen, Herceptin and Metformin sensitivity after AR silencing in MDA-MB 453 and T-47D cell lines. Cells seemed more sensitive when silenced for AR only in MDA-MB-453 at 24h post Tamoxifen treatment. Studies on Metformin have basically confirmed an increase of drug sensitivity due to AR silencing in both cell lines. Analysis of Herceptin showed how MDA-MB 453 samples silenced for AR have a slight decrease in the percentage of proliferating cells, demonstrating a possible increase in the response to treatment. These preliminary data provide the basis for further study of the modulation of the expression of AR by microRNAs and it will be interesting to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions.