Edizione commentata della Cronaca di Venezia di Giovanni Tiepolo (XVI-XVII sec.)

Il seguente studio propone l'esame di una cronaca veneziana del XVI secolo, inedita, dalle origini al 1538/39, che parte della tradizione manoscritta attribuisce al Patriarca di Venezia Giovanni Tiepolo (1619-1631), parte ad Agostino degli Agostini, (1530-1574), un patrizio veneziano il cui nome è legato essenzialmente ad una cronaca dal 421 al 1570. Indipendentemente da chi sia il primitivo autore, la cronaca, di discreto pregio per la storia interna e il funzionamento delle istituzioni veneziane, presenta elementi di spiccata originalità dal punto di vista compositivo e formale che la pongono in una prospettiva storiografica alternativa al dualismo tra la storiografia ufficiale promossa per pubblico decreto e l'iniziativa privata dei diaria del XV-XVI. La cronaca veneziana, abbandonata per formule più sofisticate e innovative di diffusione dell'informazione pubblica, sopravvive, formalmente immutata nella sua arcaicità, rinnovandosi nella tendenza a creare compendi ricchi di documenti e di elenchi, destinati ad aiutare la nobiltà ad orientarsi nel mondo socio-politico contemporaneo. Si consuma così il divorzio fra l'informazione tecnico-politica utile al patriziato nello svolgimento del suo lavoro e la storiografia pubblica che, di fronte alle varie esigenze e ai diversi generi letterari, sceglie ideologicamente di abbracciare il genere delle laus civitatis e della storiografia laudativa ed encomiastica. In questo contesto si inserisce la Cronaca esemplata dal Patriarca Giovanni Tiepolo, chiaro esempio di un tentativo di razionalizzazione dell'informazione in cui le notizie e gli elementi non ritenuti immediatamente utili come le lunghe liste dei 41 elettori, le promissioni ducali, nonchè singoli episodi ed eventi trattati, trovano una collocazione esterna alla cronaca, in quello che Reines definisce l'ormai nascente archivio politico del XVI secolo.

The Legacy of Frankenstein’s Creature: Monstrosity and Female Grotesque in Mary Shelley, Angela Carter and Jeanette Winterson

This English Literature thesis (European PhD EDGES – Women’s and Gender Studies – 34th cycle) is an investigation into the representation of the monstrous body according to the British writers Mary Shelley, Angela Carter and Jeanette Winterson. The main objective is to observe how the representation of the categories of monstrous, abject and grotesque in Western cultural imagination have been influenced across time and literary genres. In the novels of Shelley, Carter and Winterson, the monstrous subject is configured as an alternative to the anthropocentric ideal embodied by the normative subject, of which Victor Frankenstein is the paradigmatic exponent. Plus, there are places considered anti-topoi within which the monster acquires a situatedness and claims a voice, generating an opposed counter-narrative to the imaginary conveyed by the normative subject. Monstrosity outlined by Shelley in the novels Frankenstein and The Last Man constitutes the starting point of my research, aiming to observe how the discourse of the normative body vs. the anti-normative body intersects with the discourse of the spaces of the centre vs. the spaces of the margin. In Carter's novels The Passion of New Eve and Nights at the Circus, the monstrous female constitutes the embodiment of wills, desires and claims challenging the heteronormative system. The space of otherness in which Carter's monster-woman is confined becomes a possibility of reshaping identity for the Subject, deconstructing the logic of power that moulded her within society. Finally, Winterson creates two monstrous women in Sexing the Cherry and The Passion who move through urban spaces, going from the centre to the margins and testifying to the arbitrariness of the system and its weaknesses. Similarly, in Frankissstein, Winterson recovers Shelley's original novel and transforms it into a parodic and intertextual speculation on the fluidity of identity and the limits of transhumanism.

Feminist environmental humanities: intertwining theory and speculative fiction

This dissertation explores the entanglement between the visionary capacity of feminist theory to shape sustainable futures and the active contribution of feminist speculative fiction to the conceptual debate about the climate crisis. Over the last few years, increasing critical attention has been paid to ecofeminist perspectives on climate change, that see as a core cause of the climate crisis the patriarchal domination of nature, considered to go hand in hand with the oppression of women. What remains to be thoroughly scrutinised is the linkage between ecofeminist theories and other ethical stances capable of countering colonising epistemologies of mastery and dominion over nature. This dissertation intervenes in the debate about the master narrative of the Anthropocene, and about the one-dimensional perspective that often characterises its literary representations, from a feminist perspective that also aims at decolonising the imagination; it looks at literary texts that consider patriarchal domination of nature in its intersections with other injustices that play out within the Anthropocene, with a particular focus on race, colonialism, and capitalism. After an overview of the linkages between gender and climate change and between feminism and environmental humanities, it introduces the genre of climate fiction examining its main tropes. In an attempt to find alternatives to the mainstream narrative of the Anthropocene (namely to its gender-neutrality, colour-blindness, and anthropocentrism), it focuses on contemporary works of speculative fiction by four Anglophone women authors that particularly address the inequitable impacts of climate change experienced not only by women, but also by sexualised, racialised, and naturalised Others. These texts were chosen because of their specific engagement with the relationship between climate change, global capitalism, and a flat trust in techno-fixes on the one hand, and structural inequalities generated by patriarchy, racism, and intersecting systems of oppression on the other.