3 resultados para Leucoencefalopatia multifocal progressiva
em AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Resumo:
This work shows for the first time that native CSTB polymerizes on addition of Cu2+ and DnaK (Hsp70). Cysteines are involved in the polymerization process and in particular at least one cysteine is necessary. We propose that Cu2+ interacts with the thiol group of cysteine and oxidize it. The oxidized cysteine modifies the CSTB structure allowing interaction with DnaK/Hsp70 to occur. Thus, Cu2+ binding to CSTB exposes a site for DnaK and such interaction allows the polymerization of CSTB. The polymers generated from native CSTB monomers, are DTT sensitive and they may represent physiological polymers. Denatured CSTB does not require Cu2+ and polymerizes simply on addition of DnaK. The polymers generated from denatured CSTB do not respond to DTT. They have characteristics similar to those of the CSTB toxic aggregates described in vivo in eukaryotic cells following CSTB over-expression. Interaction between CSTB and Hsp70 is shown by IP experiments. The interaction occurs with WT CSTB and not with the ïcys mutant. This suggests that disulphur bonds are involved. Methal-cathalyzed oxidation of proteins involves reduction of the metal ion(s) bound to the protein itself and oxidation of neighboring ammino acid residues resulting in structural modification and de-stabilization of the molecule. In this work we propose that the cysteine thyol residue of CSTB in the presence of Cu2+ is oxidized, and cathalyzes the formation of disulphide bonds with Hsp70, that, once bound to CSTB, mediates its polymerization. In vivo this molecular mechanism of CSTB polymerization could be regulated by redox environment through the cysteine residue. This may imply that CSTB physiological polymers have a specific cellular function, different from that of the protease inhibitor known for the CSTB monomer. This hypothesis is interesting in relation to Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy of type 1 (EPM1). This pathology is usually caused by mutations in the CSTB gene. CSTB is a ubiquitous protein, but EPM1 patients have problems only in the central nervous system. Maybe physiological CSTB polymers have a specific function altered in people affected by EPM1.
Resumo:
Like other vascular tumors, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is multifocal in approximately 50% of cases, and it is unclear whether the separate lesions represent multifocal disease or metastases. We hypothesized that the identification of an identical WWTR1-CAMTA1 rearrangement in different EHEs from the same patient supports the monoclonal origin of EHE. To test our hypothesis, we undertook a molecular analysis of two multicentric EHEs of the liver, including separate tumor samples from each patient. Matherial and Methods: We retrieved two cases of EHE with available tissue for molecular analysis. In both cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed to identify the presence of the WWTR1-CAMTA1 rearrangement to confirm the histologic diagnosis of EHE, as previously described. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) products were analyzed by electrophoresis and the RT-PCR–amplified products were sequenced using the Sanger method. Results: FISH analysis revealed signal abnormalities in both WWTR1 and CAMTA1. Combined results confirmed the presence of the t(1;3)(1p36.23;3q25.1) translocation in both cases of EHE. Using RT-PCR analysis, we found that the size of the rearranged bands was identical in the different tumors from each patient. The sequence of the fusion gene confirmed a different WWTR1-CAMTA1 rearrangement in each patient, but an identical WWTR1-CAMTA1 rearrangement in the different lesions from each patient. Discussion: Because of its generally indolent clinical course, EHE is commonly classified as a multifocal, rather than metastatic, disease. In this study, we examined two cases of multifocal liver EHE and found an identical WWTR1-CAMTA1 rearrangement in each lesion from the same patient, but not between the two patients. These findings suggest that multifocal EHE arises from metastasis of the same neoplastic clone rather than from the simultaneous formation of multiple neoplastic clones, which supports the monoclonal origin of multifocal EHE.
Resumo:
Background. Clinical significance of multifocal pulmonary neuroendocrine proliferations (MNEP), including tumorlets and pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, in association with Typical Carcinoid (TC), is still debated. Methods. A large retrospective series of TC with long-term follow-up data prospectively collected from two institutions was evaluated. Recurrence or new TC development was followed-up. Patients with TC alone and MNEP+TC were compared. Results. 234 TC patients undergone surgery were included: 41 MNEP+TC (17.5%) and 193 TC alone (82.5%). In the MNEP+TC group older age (p<0.001), peripheral tumors (p=0.0032), smaller tumor size (p=0.011) and lymph-nodal spread (p=0.02) were observed in comparison with TC group. Relapses occurred in 8 patients (19.5%) in the MNEP+TC group and in 7 (3.6%) of the TC group. The 10-years progression-free survival were 96.1% in TC and 83.8% in MNEP+TC (p<0.001). After matching, in 36 pairs of patients a significantly higher 5-years progression-free survival was calculated for TC group (p<0.01). Furthermore the odds of belonging to MNEP+TC group was higher with work-related exposure to inhalant agents (p=0.008), asthma/bronchitis (p=0.002), emphysema, fibrosis and inflammatory status (p=0.032), micronodules on the chest CT scan and respiratory insufficiency (p=0.036). Conclusions. The identification of MNEP requires careful pathological examination and postoperative follow-up. MNEP seems to be an adverse prognostic factor in patients with synchronous TC. Therefore, suspicion of MNEP during the pre-operative assessment should not be underestimated, enabling changes in the surgical strategy.