Relationships between running economy and mechanics in middle-distance runners

Running economy (RE), i.e. the oxygen consumption at a given submaximal speed, is an important determinant of endurance running performance. So far, investigators have widely attempted to individuate the factors affecting RE in competitive athletes, focusing mainly on the relationships between RE and running biomechanics. However, the current results are inconsistent and a clear mechanical profile of an economic runner has not been yet established. The present work aimed to better understand how the running technique influences RE in sub-elite middle-distance runners by investigating the biomechanical parameters acting on RE and the underlying mechanisms. Special emphasis was given to accounting for intra-individual variability in RE at different speeds and to assessing track running rather than treadmill running. In Study One, a factor analysis was used to reduce the 30 considered mechanical parameters to few global descriptors of the running mechanics. Then, a biomechanical comparison between economic and non economic runners and a multiple regression analysis (with RE as criterion variable and mechanical indices as independent variables) were performed. It was found that a better RE was associated to higher knee and ankle flexion in the support phase, and that the combination of seven individuated mechanical measures explains ∼72% of the variability in RE. In Study Two, a mathematical model predicting RE a priori from the rate of force production, originally developed and used in the field of comparative biology, was adapted and tested in competitive athletes. The model showed a very good fit (R2=0.86). In conclusion, the results of this dissertation suggest that the very complex interrelationships among the mechanical parameters affecting RE may be successfully dealt with through multivariate statistical analyses and the application of theoretical mathematical models. Thanks to these results, coaches are provided with useful tools to assess the biomechanical profile of their athletes. Thus, individual weaknesses in the running technique may be identified and removed, with the ultimate goal to improve RE.

Procedimento applicativo delle misure di prevenzione personale e rito penale: un rapporto controverso

La tesi si prefigge di far luce sui rapporti intercorrenti tra il procedimento applicativo delle misure di prevenzione personale di competenza giudiziale e il processo penale. Nello specifico, l’obiettivo è quello di mettere in evidenza tanto le interferenze, quanto le somiglianze e le inaccettabili divergenze tra i due riti. Nonostante dall’art. 29 cod. ant. traspaia un’apparente indifferenza tra azione penale e azione di prevenzione, infatti, le due sfere di tutela sono così intrecciate da rendere estremamente difficile sostenere che l’una in qualche modo non sia almeno condizionata dall’andamento dell’altra. Il fatto poi che l’unica disposizione contenente la disciplina del procedimento preventivo rinvii, per quanto non espressamente previsto e sempreché vi sia compatibilità, a quella dell’incidente di esecuzione ex art. 666 c.p.p., rimarca la vicinanza con il rito penale; una vicinanza che obbliga dottrina e giurisprudenza a interrogarsi per comprendere se almeno le principali tra le regole e i principi dettati per il processo penale possano valere anche per quello di prevenzione. Il cuore del lavoro sarà dunque dedicato a questa controversa opera di ricostruzione, al fine di individuare le garanzie che devono (o almeno dovrebbero) essere riconosciute al proposto.

Coworking spaces: thriving and organizing in the new world of work

The present Ph.D. thesis proposes three studies on coworking spaces to understand how they foster thriving and organizing in the new world of work. The first study maps and analyzes the thematic structure and evolution of the academic debate that has emerged around coworking spaces in recent years. In doing so, it conducts a science mapping analysis of 351 publications on coworking spaces to detect and visualize key themes in the literature and their co-occurrence with subthemes. The second study proposes an interpretive review of 98 publications from multiple disciplines to shed light on how coworking spaces emerge as sites of organizing for professionals who are not formally connected to one another. It suggests five dimensions that articulate coworking spaces as sites of organizing – ‘materiality,’ ‘temporality,’ ‘affect,’ ‘identity,’ and ‘formalization.’ This study aims to go beyond the community-related understanding of coworking that has characterized most scholarly attention, instead focusing on coworking spaces’ organizational character. The third study investigates what drives thriving at work for remote workers in coworking spaces. In doing so, it acknowledges the potential complex set of interrelationships underpinning thriving at work and mobilizes complexity theory and qualitative comparative analysis to uncover six different, yet equifinal, configurations of antecedents driving remote workers’ thriving in coworking spaces.