adaptive capabilities of the pi3k/akt/mtor pathway in acute myeloid leukemia revealed by the use of selective inhibitors

Because of its aberrant activation, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway represents a pharmacological target in blast cells from patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Using Reverse Phase Protein Microarrays (RPMA), we have analyzed 20 phosphorylated epitopes of the PI3K/Akt/mTor signal pathway of peripheral blood and bone marrow specimens of 84 patients with newly diagnosed AML. Fresh blast cells were grown for 2 h, 4 h or 20 h untreated or treated with a panel of phase I or phase II Akt allosteric inhibitors, either alone or in combination with the mTOR kinase inhibitor Torin1 or the broad RTK inhibitor Sunitinib. By unsupervised hierarchical clustering a strong phosphorylation/activity of most of the sampled members of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway was observed in 70% of samples from AML patients. Remarkably, however, we observed that inhibition of Akt phosphorylation, as well as of its substrates, was transient, and recovered or even increased far above basal level after 20 h in 60% samples. We demonstrated that inhibition of Akt induces FOXO-dependent insulin receptor expression and IRS-1 activation, attenuating the effect of drug treatment by reactivation of PI3K/Akt. Consistent with this model we found that combined inhibition of Akt and RTKs is much more effective than either alone, revealing the adaptive capabilities of signaling networks in blast cells and highliting the limations of these drugs if used as monotherapy.

Mechanisms Contributing to Tyrosin Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in GISTs: Toward a Personalized Therapy

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. This work considers the pharmacological response in GIST patients treated with imatinib by two different angles: the genetic and somatic point of view. We analyzed polymorphisms influence on treatment outcome, keeping in consideration SNPs in genes involved in drug transport and folate pathway. Naturally, all these intriguing results cannot be considered as the only main mechanism in imatinib response. GIST mainly depends by oncogenic gain of function mutations in tyrosin kinase receptor genes, KIT or PDGFRA, and the mutational status of these two genes or acquisition of secondary mutation is considered the main player in GIST development and progression. To this purpose we analyzed the secondary mutations to better understand how these are involved in imatinib resistance. In our analysis we considered both imatinib and the second line treatment, sunitinib, in a subset of progressive patients. KIT/PDGFRA mutation analysis is an important tool for physicians, as specific mutations may guide therapeutic choices. Currently, the only adaptations in treatment strategy include imatinib starting dose of 800 mg/daily in KIT exon-9-mutated GISTs. In the attempt to individualize treatment, genetic polymorphisms represent a novelty in the definition of biomarkers of imatinib response in addition to the use of tumor genotype. Accumulating data indicate a contributing role of pharmacokinetics in imatinib efficacy, as well as initial response, time to progression and acquired resistance. At the same time it is becoming evident that genetic host factors may contribute to the observed pharmacokinetic inter-patient variability. Genetic polymorphisms in transporters and metabolism may affect the activity or stability of the encoded enzymes. Thus, integrating pharmacogenetic data of imatinib transporters and metabolizing genes, whose interplay has yet to be fully unraveled, has the potential to provide further insight into imatinib response/resistance mechanisms.