3 resultados para Genes, Developmental
em AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Resumo:
Grape berry is considered a non climacteric fruit, but there are some evidences that ethylene plays a role in the control of berry ripening. This PhD thesis aimed to give insights in the role of ethylene and ethylene-related genes in the regulation of grape berry ripening. During this study a small increase in ethylene concentration one week before véraison has been measured in Vitis vinifera L. ‘Pinot Noir’ grapes confirming previous findings in ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’. In addition, ethylene-related genes have been identified in the grapevine genome sequence. Similarly to other species, biosynthesis and ethylene receptor genes are present in grapevine as multi-gene families and their expression appeared tissue or developmental specific. All the other elements of the ethylene signal transduction cascade were also identified in the grape genome. Among them, there were ethylene response factors (ERF) which modulate the transcription of many effector genes in response to ethylene. In this study seven grapevine ERFs have been characterized and they showed tissue and berry development specific expression profiles. Two sequences, VvERF045 and VvERF063, seemed likely involved in berry ripening control due to their expression profiles and their sequence annotation. VvERF045 was induced before véraison and was specific of the ripe berry, by sequence similarity it was likely a transcription activator. VvERF063 displayed high sequence similarity to repressors of transcription and its expression, very high in green berries, was lowest at véraison and during ripening. To functionally characterize VvERF045 and VvERF063, a stable transformation strategy was chosen. Both sequences were cloned in vectors for over-expression and silencing and transferred in grape by Agrobacterium-mediated or biolistic-mediated gene transfer. In vitro, transgenic VvERF045 over-expressing plants displayed an epinastic phenotype whose extent was correlated to the transgene expression level. Four pathogen stress response genes were significantly induced in the transgenic plants, suggesting a putative function of VvERF045 in biotic stress defense during berry ripening. Further molecular analysis on the transgenic plants will help in identifying the actual VvERF045 target genes and together with the phenotypic characterization of the adult transgenic plants, will allow to extensively define the role of VvERF045 in berry ripening.
Resumo:
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and Intellectual Disability (ID) are complex neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by extensive clinical and genetic heterogeneity and with overlapping risk factors. The aim of my project was to further investigate the role of Copy Numbers Variants (CNVs), identified through genome-wide studies performed by the Autism Geome Project (AGP) and the CHERISH consortium in large cohorts of ASD and ID cases, respectively. Specifically, I focused on four rare genic CNVs, selected on the basis of their impact on interesting ASD/ID candidate genes: a) a compound heterozygous deletion involving CTNNA3, predicted to cause the lack of functional protein; b) a 15q13.3 duplication containing CHRNA7; c) a 2q31.1 microdeletion encompassing KLHL23, SSB and METTL5; d) Lastly, I investigated the putative imprinting regulation of the CADPS2 gene, disrupted by a maternal deletion in two siblings with ASD and ID. This study provides further evidence for the role of CTNNA3, CHRNA7, KLHL23 and CADPS2 as ASD and/or ID susceptibility genes, and highlights that rare genetic variation contributes to disease risk in different ways: some rare mutations, such as those impacting CTNNA3, act in a recessive mode of inheritance, while other CNVs, such as those occurring in the 15q13.3 region, are implicated in multiple developmental and/or neurological disorders possibly interacting with other susceptibility variants elsewhere in the genome. On the other hand, the discovery of a tissue-specific monoallelic expression for the CADPS2 gene, implicates the involvement of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms as risk factors conferring susceptibility to ASD/ID.
Resumo:
Objectives: To fully re-evaluate patients with early-onset epilepsy and intellectual disability with neurological, neurophysiological and neuropsychological examination in order to contribute to expanding the phenotypic spectrum of known epileptic encephalopathy (EE)-related genes and to identify novel genetic defects underlying EEs. Methods: We recruited patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID) referring to our Epilepsy Centre. Patients underwent full clinical and neurophysiologic evaluation. When possible they underwent neuroradiologic investigations. Selected cases also underwent genetic analysis. Results: We recruited 200 patients (109 M, 91 F; mean age 36 years old). Mean age at epilepsy onset was 4 years old. The degree of ID was borderline in 4.5% of patients, mild in 25%, moderate in 38% and severe in 32.5%. EEG showed epileptiform abnormalities in 79.5% of patients. One hundred and thirty-one patients out of the 200 recruited (65.5%) did not have an aetiological diagnosis. All the patients underwent full clinical reassessment and when necessary they performed neuroradiologic and genetic investigations as well. We identified 35 patients with a genetic aetiology. In 8 cases a structural brain lesion was observed. In 33 patients, a genetic aetiology was identified. In 2 patients with drug-resistant seizures video-EEG allowed the identification of non-epileptic seizures, and in one patient we discontinued anti-epileptic drugs. In these patients, the aetiological diagnosis was made after 30 years (range 9-60 years) from the disease onset. Conclusions: In a population of 200 adult patients with epilepsy and ID, an aetiological cause was identified in 45 patients after 30 years from the disease onset. Aetiological diagnosis, especially if genetic, has significant positive implications for patients, even if it has been made after years from the beginning of the disease. Benefits include better-focused antiepileptic drug (AED) choice, sparing of further unnecessary investigations and improved knowledge of comorbidities.