A novel phase variation mechanism in the meningococcus driven by a ligand-responsive repressor and differential spacing of distal promoter elements

Phase variable expression, mediated by high frequency reversible changes in the length of simple sequence repeats, facilitates adaptation of bacterial populations to changing environments and is frequently important in bacterial virulence. Here we elucidate a novel phase variable mechanism for NadA expression, an adhesin and invasin of Neisseria meningitidis. The NadR repressor protein binds to operators flanking the phase variable tract of the nadA promoter gene and contributes to the differential expression levels of phase variant promoters with different numbers of repeats, likely due to different spacing between operators. It is shown that IHF binds between these operators, and may permit looping of the promoter, allowing interaction of NadR at operators located distally or overlapping the promoter. The 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, a metabolite of aromatic amino acid catabolism that is secreted in saliva, induces nadA expression by inhibiting the DNA binding activity of the NadR repressor. When induced, only minor differences are evident between NadR-independent transcription levels of promoter phase variants, which are likely due to differential RNA polymerase contacts leading to altered promoter activity. These results suggest that NadA expression is under both stochastic and tight environmental-sensing regulatory control, and both regulations are mediated by the NadR repressor that and may be induced during colonization of the oropharynx where it plays a major role in the successful adhesion and invasion of the mucosa. Hence, simple sequence repeats in promoter regions may be a strategy used by host-adapted bacterial pathogens to randomly switch between expression states that may nonetheless still be induced by appropriate niche-specific signals.

The use of expandable megaprostheses for reconstruction of the distal femur in pediatric patients after bone tumor resection

Expandable prostheses are becoming increasingly popular in the reconstruction of children with bone sarcomas of the lower limb. Since the introduction of effective chemotherapy in the treatment of these pathologies, in the 70s, there has been need for new limb salvage techniques. In children, limb salvage of the lower limbs is particularly challenging, not in the last place, because of the loss of growth potential. Therefore, expandable prostheses have been developed. However, the first experiences with these implants were not very successful. High complication rates and unpredictable outcomes raised major concerns on this innovative type of reconstruction. The rarity of the indication is one of the main reasons why there has been a relatively slow learning curve and implant development regarding this type of prosthesis. This PhD thesis, gives an overview of the introduction, the development, the current standards, and the future perspectives of expandable prostheses for the reconstruction of the distal femur in children.

The frozen elephant trunk technique for the treatment of complex aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta pathologies: long term outcomes and distal reintervention

Background: The frozen elephant trunk(FET) technique is one of the last evolution in the treatment of complex pathologies of the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta.Materials and methods: Between January 2007 and March 2021, a total of 396 patients underwent total aortic arch replacements with the FET technique in our centre.The main indications were thoracic aortic aneurysm(n=104,28.2%), chronic aortic dissection(n=224,53.4%) and acute aortic dissection(n=68, 18.4%). We divided the population in two groups according the position of the distal anastomosis (zone 2 vs zone 3) and the length of the stent graft (< 150 mm vs > 150 mm): conservative group (Zone 2 anastomosis + stent length < 150mm, n. 140 pts) and aggressive group (zone 3 anastomosis + stent length > 150mm, n. 141). Results: The overall 30-day mortality rate was 13%(48/369); the risk factor analysis showed that an aggressive approach was neither a risk factor for major complication (permanent dialysis, tracheostomy, bowel malperfusion and permanent paraplegia) neither for 30-day mortality. The survival rate at 1, 5,10 and 15 years was 87.7%,75%,61.3% and 58.4% respectively. During the follow up, an aortic reintervention was performed in 122 patients (38%), 5 patients received a non-aortic cardiac surgery. Freedom from aortic reintervention at 1-,5- and 10-year was 77%,54% and 44% respectively. The freedom from aortic reintervention was higher in the ‘aggressive’ group (62.5%vs40.0% at 5 years, log-rank=0.056). An aggressive approach was not protective for aortic reintervention at follow up and for death at follow up. Conclusions: The FET technique represents a feasible and efficient option in the treatment of complex thoracic aortic pathologies. An aortic reintervention after FET is very common and the decision-making approach should consider and balance the higher risk of an aggressive approach in terms of post-operative complication versus the higher risk of a second aortic reintervention at follow-up.