Valutazione del rapporto urinario proteine totali/creatinina e albumina/creatinina in cani affetti da iperadrenocorticismo e da diabete mellito

INTRODUCTION – In human medicine, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, proteinuria and nephropathy are often associated although it is still not clear whether hypertension is the consequence or the cause of nephropathy and albuminuria. Microalbuminuria, in humans, is an early and sensitive marker which permits timely and effective therapy in the early phase of renal damage. Conversely, in dogs, these relationships were not fully investigated, even though hypertension has been associated with many diseases (Bodey and Michell, 1996). In a previous study, 20% of diabetic dogs were found proteinuric based on a U:P/C > 1 and 46% were hypertensive; this latter finding is similar to the prevalence of hypertension in diabetic people (40-80%) (Struble et al., 1998). In the same canine study, hypertension was also positively correlated with the duration of the disease, as is the case in human beings. Hypertension was also found to be a common complication of hypercortisolism (HC) in dogs, with a prevalence which varies from 50 (Goy-Thollot et al., 2002) to 80% (Danese and Aron, 1994).The aim of our study was to evaluate the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (U:A/C) in dogs affected by Diabetes Mellitus and HC in order to ascertain if, as in human beings, it could represent an early and more sensitive marker of renal damage than U:P/C. Furthermore, the relationship between proteinuria and hypertension in DM and HC was also investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS – Twenty dogs with DM, 14 with HC and 21 healthy dogs (control group) were included in the prospective case-control study. Inclusion criteria were hyperglycaemia, glicosuria and serum fructosamine above the reference range for DM dogs and a positive ACTH stimulation test and/or low-dose dexamethasone test and consistent findings of HC on abdominal ultrasonography in HC dogs. Dogs were excluded if affected by urinary tract infections and if the serum creatinine or urea values were above the reference range. At the moment of inclusion, an appropriate therapy had already been instituted less than 1 month earlier in 12 diabetic dogs. The control dogs were considered healthy based on clinical exam and clinicopathological findings. All dogs underwent urine sample collection by cystocentesis and systemic blood pressure measurement by means of either an oscillometric device (BP-88 Next, Colin Corporation, Japan) or by Doppler ultrasonic traducer (Minidop ES-100VX, Hadeco, Japan). The choice of method depended on the dog’s body weight: Doppler ultrasonography was employed in dogs < 20 kg of body weight and the oscillometric method in the other subjects. Dogs were considered hypertensive whenever systemic blood pressure was found ≥ 160 mmHg. The urine was assayed for U:P/C and U:A/C (Gentilini et al., 2005). The data between groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The reference ranges for U:P/C and U:A/C had already been established by our laboratory as 0.6 and 0.05, respectively. U:P/C and U:A/C findings were correlated to systemic blood pressure and Spearman R correlation coefficients were calculated. In all cases, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS – The mean ± sd urinary albumin concentration in the three groups was 1.79 mg/dl ± 2.18; 20.02 mg/dl ± 43.25; 52.02 mg/dl ± 98.27, in healthy, diabetic and hypercortisolemic dogs, respectively. The urine albumin concentration differed significantly between healthy and diabetic dogs (p = 0.008) and between healthy and HC dogs (p = 0.011). U:A/C values ranged from 0.00 to 0.34 (mean ± sd 0.02 ± 0.07), 0.00 to 6.72 (mean ± sd 0.62 ± 1.52) and 0.00 to 5.52 (mean ± sd 1.27 ± 1.70) in the control, DM and HC groups, respectively; U:P/C values ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 (mean ± sd 0.17 ± 0.15) 0.1 to 6.6 (mean ± sd 0.93 ± 1.15) and 0.2 to 7.1 (mean ± sd 1.90 ± 2.11) in the control, DM and HC groups, respectively. In diabetic dogs, U:A/C was above the reference range in 11 out of 20 dogs (55%). Among these, 5/20 (25%) showed an increase only in the U:A/C ratio while, in 6/20 (30%), both the U:P/C and the U:A/C were abnormal. Among the latter, 4 dogs had already undergone therapy. In subjects affected with HC, U:P/C and U:A/C were both increased in 10/14 (71%) while in 2/14 (14%) only U:A/C was above the reference range. Overall, by comparing U:P/C and U:A/C in the various groups, a significant increase in protein excretion in disease-affected animals compared to healthy dogs was found. Blood pressure (BP) in diabetic subjects ranged from 88 to 203 mmHg (mean ± sd 143 ± 33 mmHg) and 7/20 (35%) dogs were found to be hypertensive. In HC dogs, BP ranged from 116 to 200 mmHg (mean ± sd 167 ± 26 mmHg) and 9/14 (64%) dogs were hypertensive. Blood pressure and proteinuria were not significantly correlated. Furthermore, in the DM group, U:P/C and U:A/C were both increased in 3 hypertensive dogs and 2 normotensive dogs while the only increase of U:A/C was observed in 2 hypertensive and 3 normotensive dogs. In the HC group, the U:P/C and the U:A/C were both increased in 6 hypertensive and 2 normotensive dogs; the U:A/C was the sole increased parameter in 1 hypertensive dog and in 1 dog with normal pressure. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION- The findings of this study suggest that, in dogs affected by DM and HC, an increase in U:P/C, U:A/C and systemic hypertension is frequently present. Remarkably, some dogs affected by both DM and HC showed an U:A/C but not U:P/C above the reference range. In diabetic dogs, albuminuria was observed in 25% of the subjects, suggesting the possibility that this parameter could be employed for detecting renal damage at an early phase when common semiquantiative tests and even U:P/C fall inside the reference range. In HC dogs, a higher number of subjects with overt proteinuria was found while only 14% presented an increase only in the U:A/C. This fact, associated with a greater number of hypertensive dogs having HC rather than DM, could suggest a greater influence on renal function by the mechanisms involved in hypertension secondary to hypercortisolemia. Furthermore, it is possible that, in HC dogs, the diagnosis was more delayed than in DM dogs. However, the lack of a statistically significant correlation between hypertension and increased protein excretion as well as the apparently random distribution of proteinuric subjects in normotensive and hypertensive cases, imply that other factors besides hypertension are involved in causing proteinuria. Longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate the relationship between hypertension and proteinuria.

Diabete ed ischemia critica degli arti inferiori. Studio del danno della parete arteriosa e del ruolo dell'endotelio circolante nella riparazione tessutale e nella neoangiogenesi

Objectives In diabetic and non diabetic patients with peripheral artery obstructive disease (PAOD), we sought to establish whether the vascular wall damage, the mature circulating endothelium and the "in situ" neoangiogenesis are related with each other. Design In the peripheral blood of diabetic patients suffering critical ischaemia associated with peripheral artery disease, low levels and poor function of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were observed. Moreover, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been described in different conditions of vascular injury. In this type of disorders, which are all characterized by endothelial damage, neoangiogenesis plays a key role. Materials In the study we recruited 22 diabetic and 16 non diabetic patients, all of them suffering PAOD and critical ischaemia; healthy subjects and multiorgan donors have also been considered like controls. Methods Histopathologic characterization was performed on arterial tissue samples under a light microscope. Flow cytofluorimetric analysis was used to quantify CECs in peripheral blood samples. "In situ" expression of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) transcripts was quantified in a Real Time-PCR analysis. Circulating VEGF concentration was determined by an ELISA assay. Results Arterial wall from diabetic patients, compared with non diabetic subjects, revealed a higher incidence of serious lesions (60% vs 47%) and a lower number of capillaries (65% vs 87%). Mean number of CECs/ml was significantly increased in all patients, compared to healthy controls (p=0.001). Compared to healthy subjects, VEGF transcripts expression resulted significantly higher in diabetic patients and in all patients (p<0.05) and a similar result was obtained in the MMP-9 transcripts expression. Serum VEGF concentration was significantly increased in PAOD patients correlated with controls (p=0.0431). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that in all patients considered, probably, regressive phenomenons prevail on reparative ones, causing an inesorable and progressive degeneration of the vascular wall, worse by diabetes. The vascular damage can be monitored by determining CECs number and its severity and development are emphasized by the MMP-9 transcripts expression. The "in situ" VEGF increased expression seems to be the evidence of a parietal cells bid to induce local angiogenesis. This reparing mechanism could induce the EPCs mobilitation by means the release of VEGF from the arterial wall. The mechanism, however, is ineffective like demonstrated by the EPCs reduced number and activities observed in patients suffering PAOD and critical ischaemia.

Diabete ed ischemia critica degli arti inferiori. Valutazione degli indicatori sierologici di danno di parete: determinazione quantitativa delle cellule endoteliali circolanti mature

OBIETTIVO : Quantificare le CECs/ml nei pazienti affetti da ischemia critica (IC) degli arti inferiori, eventuali correlazioni tra i fattori di rischio, lo stadio clinico con l’ aumento delle CECs. Valutare i cambiamenti strutturali (calcificazione ed infiltratto infiammatorio) e l’ angiogenesi (numero di capillari /sezione) della parete arteriosa. MATERIALI E METODI: Da Maggio 2006 ad Aprile 2008 in modo prospettico abbiamo arruolato paziente affetti da IC da sottoporre ad intervento chirurgico. In un data base abbiamo raccolto : caratteristiche demografiche, fattori di rischio, stadiazione dell'IC secondo Leriche-Fontaine (L-F), il tipo di intervento chirurgico. Per ogni paziente abbiamo effettuato un prelievo ematico di 2 ml per la quantificazione immunomagnetica delle CECs e prelievo di parete arteriosa. RISULTATI: In modo consecutivo abbiamo arruolato 33 pazienti (75.8% maschi) con età media di 71 aa (range 34-91aa), affetti da arteriopatia ostruttiva cronica periferica al IV stadio di L-F nel 84.8%, da cardiopatia ischemica cronica nel 60.6%, da ipertensione arteriosa nel 72.7% e da diabete mellito di II tipo nel 66.6%. Il valore medio di CECs/ml è risultato significativamente più elevato (p= 0.001) nei soggetti affetti da IC (CECs/ml =531.24 range 107- 3330) rispetto ai casi controllo (CECs/ml = 125.8 range 19-346 ). Le CECs/ml nei pazienti diabetici sono maggiori rispetto alle CECs/ml nei pazienti non diabetici ( 726.7 /ml vs 325.5/ml ), p< 0.05 I pazienti diabetici hanno presentato maggior incidenza di lesioni arteriose complesse rispetto ai non diabetici (66% vs 47%) e minor densità capillare (65% vs 87%). Conclusioni : Le CECs sono un marker sierologico attendibile di danno vascolare parietale, la loro quantità è maggiore nei pazienti diabetici e ipertesi. La minor capacità angiogenetica della parete arteriosa in presenza di maggior calcificazioni ed infiltrato infiammatorio nei diabetici, dimostra un danno istopatologico di parete maggiore .

Diabete mellito nel cane: terapia, monitoraggio e aspetti prognostici

Il diabete mellito (DM) è una delle malattie endocrine più comuni nel cane. Una volta raggiunta la diagnosi di DM, è necessario iniziare un trattamento insulinico nonché una dieta specifica, al fine di controllare i livelli di glucosio nel sangue e di conseguenza i segni clinici. Inoltre, al fine di ottenere un buon controllo glicemico, è essenziale garantire uno stretto monitoraggio terapeutico. Nella presente tesi sono riportati numerosi studi relativi a trattamento, monitoraggio e prognosi dei cani con DM. Il capitolo 2 è una review che illustra i principali aspetti terapeutici e di monitoraggio del DM. Il capitolo 3 riporta uno studio che confronta l'efficacia e la sicurezza dell'insulina Lenta e dell'insulina Neutra Protamine Hagedorn (NPH). I metodi di monitoraggio per cani con DM possono essere classificati in diretti od indiretti. I metodi di monitoraggio diretto includono misurazioni serali della glicemia o monitoraggio continuo del glucosio interstiziale tramite appositi dispositivi (Continuous Glucose Monitoring System, CGMS). Le modalità indirette comprendono la valutazione dell'assunzione di acqua e del peso corporeo, la quantificazione del glucosio/chetoni nelle urine e la misurazione delle concentrazioni di proteine glicate. Il capitolo 4 mostra uno studio volto a valutare l'accuratezza e la precisione di un glucometro e un glucometro/chetometro nel cane. Il Flash Glucose Monitoring system è un CGMS recentemente validato per l'uso nel cane; la sua utilità clinica nel monitoraggio del DM canino è esaminata nel capitolo 5. Il capitolo 6 descrive uno studio in cui si validano 2 metodi analitici per la misurazione delle fruttosamine sieriche e dell'emoglobina glicata nel cane e confronta l’utilità delle due proteine glicate nel definire il controllo glicemico. Infine, il capitolo 7 riporta uno studio finalizzato a determinare il tempo di sopravvivenza e ad identificare il valore prognostico di diverse variabili cliniche e clinico-patologiche nei cani con DM.