Social inclusion of vulnerable groups through participatory and emancipatory approaches. Implementing active citizenship and socially innovative actions in the framework of civil & human rights model of disability

The research hypothesis of the thesis is that “an open participation in the co-creation of the services and environments, makes life easier for vulnerable groups”; assuming that the participatory and emancipatory approaches are processes of possible actions and changes aimed at facilitating people’s lives. The adoption of these approaches is put forward as the common denominator of social innovative practices that supporting inclusive processes allow a shift from a medical model to a civil and human rights approach to disability. The theoretical basis of this assumption finds support in many principles of Inclusive Education and the main focus of the hypothesis of research is on participation and emancipation as approaches aimed at facing emerging and existing problems related to inclusion. The framework of reference for the research is represented by the perspectives adopted by several international documents concerning policies and interventions to promote and support the leadership and participation of vulnerable groups. In the first part an in-depth analysis of the main academic publications on the central themes of the thesis has been carried out. After investigating the framework of reference, the analysis focuses on the main tools of participatory and emancipatory approaches, which are able to connect with the concepts of active citizenship and social innovation. In the second part two case studies concerning participatory and emancipatory approaches in the areas of concern are presented and analyzed as example of the improvement of inclusion, through the involvement and participation of persons with disability. The research has been developed using a holistic and interdisciplinary approach, aimed at providing a knowledge-base that fosters a shift from a situation of passivity and care towards a new scenario based on the person’s commitment in the elaboration of his/her own project of life.

La salute detenuta: tra diritto e sicurezza”. Un’ indagine nella Casa Circondariale di Rimini.

The survey approachs the issue of health and the problem of its effective protection in a context of deprivation of liberty and coercion, which is the prison. The theoretical reflection born from the reform of the Legislative Decree 230/99 which marked the transition from an employee by the Prison Health within prison a fully integrated in the National Health Service. The comparison between an institution of health promotion and institution of punishment which may operate on the same subject held produces multiple attrits, making their relationship problematic. The work shows the daily difficulties in the management of prison health within the institution, physician-patient between different health care roles, and between the latter and prison workers. The coexistence, in fact, is not always harmonious though quite often it is common sense and the willingness of operators to reduce barriers: overcrowding, limited resources and insufficient staff make the application of the rule and therefore the right to goal a difficult to be pursued. It is designed for a scheme of semi-structured interview essay is divided into 3 sections covering: "staff and its functions", "health reform" and "health of the prisoner"; questions were directed to doctors, nurses and psychologists engaged inside the prison of Rimini with the specific aim of examining the ambivalent relationship between the demand for health care in prisons and the need for security and a clear - albeit partial - point of view. We tried to reconstruct the situation of prison health care through the perception of prison operators, capturing the problematic issues that deal on both issues is instrumental to the experience of persons detained by analyzing, in terms of operators , what happens inside of a prison institution in everyday health care.

La administración concursal como sujeto del proceso jurisdiccional español. Su posición en la determinación del patrimonio concursal

Desde tiempos inmemoriales, la presencia de sujetos encargados de la administración del patrimonio del concursado ha sido consustancial a la existencia de procesos en los que se declaraba la insolvencia del deudor. Tradicionalmente, estos sujetos ostentaban un papel de singular alcance para el correcto desarrollo del concurso. En la actualidad se erigen en el motor del concurso. El vasto cometido atribuido a la administración concursal nos obliga a restringir nuestra investigación. En particular, centraremos nuestra atención en la posición jurídico procesal de la administración concursal en aquellas actuaciones que desarrolla ésta a la hora de determinar el patrimonio concursal. Para ello, partiendo de las líneas generales que a través de la historia han definido a los órganos de administración concursal, analizaremos el régimen jurídico de la actual administración concursal en España. A continuación, estudiaremos la naturaleza jurídica de la limitación a las facultades patrimoniales que sufre el deudor con la declaración de concurso y el reconocimiento que, como parte procesal, le atribuye la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil al patrimonio concursal. Todo ello, nos permitirá pronunciarnos sobre la referida posición de la administración concursal, como parte o como representante. Tras lo descrito, nos ocuparemos de determinar la posición que ocupa la administración concursal en aquellos procesos que ya estuvieran pendientes en el momento de la declaración de concurso y aquellos otros procesos nuevos que inicia aquella por su propia iniciativa. Por último, analizaremos la descrita posición procesal en el ejercicio de acciones de reintegración y demás de impugnación así como en aquellos supuestos en los que se impugna el inventario o la lista de acreedores.