3 resultados para Crow Indians.
em AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Resumo:
Faithful replication of DNA from one generation to the next is crucial for long-term species survival. Genomic integrity in prokaryotes, archaea and eukaryotes is dependent on efficient and accurate catalysis by multiple DNA polymerases. Escherichia coli possesses five known DNA polymerases (Pol). DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is the major replicative polymerase of the Escherichia coli chromosome (Kornberg, 1982). This enzyme contains two Pol III cores that are held together by a t dimer (Studwell-Vaughan and O’Donnell, 1991). The core is composed of three different proteins named α-, ε- and θ-subunit. The α-subunit, encoded by dnaE, contains the catalytic site for DNA polymerisation (Maki and Kornberg, 1985), the ε-subunit, encoded by dnaQ, contains the 3′→5′ proofreading exonuclease (Scheuermann, et al., 1983) and the θ-subunit, encoded by hole, that has no catalytic activity (Studwell-Vaughan, and O'Donnell, 1983). The three-subunit α–ε–θ DNA pol III complex is the minimal active polymerase form purified from the DNA pol III holoenzyme complex; these three polypeptides are tightly associated in the core (McHenry and Crow, 1979) Despite a wealth of data concerning the properties of DNA polymerase III in vitro, little information is available on the assembly in vivo of this complex enzyme. In this study it is shown that the C-terminal region of the proofreading subunit is labile and that the ClpP protease and the molecular chaperones GroL and DnaK control the overall concentration in vivo of ε. Two α-helices (comprising the residues E311-M335 and G339-D353, respectively) of the N-terminal region of the polymerase subunit were shown to be essential for the binding to ε. These informations could be utilized to produce a conditional mutator strain in which proofreading activity would be titrated by a a variant that can only bind e and that is polymerase-deficient. In this way the replication of DNA made by DNA Pol-III holoenzyme would accordingly become error-prone.
Resumo:
The dissertation is structured in three parts. The first part compares US and EU agricultural policies since the end of WWII. There is not enough evidence for claiming that agricultural support has a negative impact on obesity trends. I discuss the possibility of an exchange in best practices to fight obesity. There are relevant economic, societal and legal differences between the US and the EU. However, partnerships against obesity are welcomed. The second part presents a socio-ecological model of the determinants of obesity. I employ an interdisciplinary model because it captures the simultaneous influence of several variables. Obesity is an interaction of pre-birth, primary and secondary socialization factors. To test the significance of each factor, I use data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health. I compare the average body mass index across different populations. Differences in means are statistically significant. In the last part I use the National Survey of Children Health. I analyze the effect that family characteristics, built environment, cultural norms and individual factors have on the body mass index (BMI). I use Ordered Probit models and I calculate the marginal effects. I use State and ethnicity fixed effects to control for unobserved heterogeneity. I find that southern US States tend have on average a higher probability of being obese. On the ethnicity side, White Americans have a lower BMI respect to Black Americans, Hispanics and American Indians Native Islanders; being Asian is associated with a lower probability of being obese. In neighborhoods where trust level and safety perception are higher, children are less overweight and obese. Similar results are shown for higher level of parental income and education. Breastfeeding has a negative impact. Higher values of measures of behavioral disorders have a positive and significant impact on obesity, as predicted by the theory.
Resumo:
Varcare le frontiere della Storia attraverso le storie personali dei suoi personaggi ha sempre affascinato la sensibilità creatrice di Anita Desai, i cui romanzi possono essere considerati un interessante esempio di letteratura di confine, che riesce nel difficile compito di misurarsi, con eleganza e sensibilità, nella rappresentazione delle più feroci forme di marginalizzazione. Proponendo un dialogo tra alterità, che apre alle complessità storico-culturali in maniera del tutto a-ideologica e imparziale, la scrittrice indoinglese procede alla “provincializzazione” dell’India attraverso le numerose ambivalenze prodotte nelle zone frontaliere analizzate. Dalla rappresentazione della frontiera identitaria esterna, ovvero dall’ambivalente rapporto intrattenuto con il colonizzatore/ex-colonizzatore inglese, alla rappresentazione della frontiera identitaria interna, ovvero l’analisi delle contraddittorie relazioni tra le componenti etniche del subcontinente, Desai arriva infine a problematizzare storie di ambivalenti processi di marginalizzazione prodotti da mondi culturali così diversi come la Germania nazista, o gli indiani Huichol del lontano Messico, tracciando geografie culturali inedite della grande ragnatela della Storia. Desai riesce così a recuperare voci liminali spesso trascurate dalla postcolonialità stessa, per riconfigurarle in un’esplorazione profonda del comune destino dell’umanità, voci straniate e stranianti che acquisiscono un vero e proprio status di agency discorsiva, proiettando la sua scrittura verso una dimensione cosmopolitica. L’opera di Desai diventa indubbiamente un’opportunità concreta per scorgere nella differenza l’universalità di una comune umanità, vale a dire un’opportunità per vedere nell’alterità un’identità ribaltata.