The relationship between eating behavior and psychological distress among overweight and obese people: is there a role for mindfulness?

This research based on 3 indipendent studies, sought to explore the nature of the relationship between overweight/obesity, eating behaviors and psychological distress; the construct of Mindful eating trough the validation of the Italian adaptation of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ); the role of mindfulnessand mindful eating as respectively potential mediator and moderator between overeating behavior (binge eating and emotional overeating) and negative outcomes (psychological distress, body dissatisfaction). All the samples were divided in normal weight, overweight and obese according to BMI categories. STUDY1: In a sample of 691 subjects (69.6% female, mean aged 39.26 years) was found that BMI was not associated with psychological distress, whereas binge eating increases the psychopathological level. BMI and male gender represent negative predictors of psychological distress, but certain types of overeating (i.e., NES/grazing, overeating during or out of meals, and guilt/restraint) result as positive predictors.. STUDY 2 : A sample of 1067 subjects (61.4% female, mean aged 34 years) was analized. The Italian MEQ resulted in a 26-item 4-factor model measuring Disinhibition, Awareness, Distraction, and Emotional response. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable MEQ correlated positively with mindfulness (FMI) and it was associated with sociodemographic variables, BMI, meditation. type of exercise and diet. STUDY 3, based on a sample of 502 subjects (68.8% female, mean aged 39.42 years) showed that MEQ and FMI negatively correlated with BES, EOQ, SCL-90-R, and BIAQ. Obese people showed lower level of mindful eating and higher levels of binge eating, emotional overeating, and body dissatisfaction, compared to the other groups Mindfulness resulted to partially mediates the relationship between a) binge eating and psychological distress, b) emotional overeating and psychological distress, c) binge eating and mental well-being, d) emotional overeating and menal well-being. Mindful eating was a moderator only in the relationship between emotional overeating and body dissatisfaction.

Ottimizzazione del consumo dei grassi durante esercizio fisico: studio di un test per il target mirato di allenamento individuale

Il primo studio ha verificato l'affidabilità del software Polimedicus e gli effetti indotti d'allenamento arobico all’intensità del FatMax. 16 soggetti sovrappeso, di circa 40-55anni, sono stati arruolati e sottoposti a un test incrementale fino a raggiungere un RER di 0,95, e da quel momento il carico è stato aumentato di 1 km/ h ogni minuto fino a esaurimento. Successivamente, è stato verificato se i valori estrapolati dal programma erano quelli che si possono verificare durante a un test a carico costante di 1ora. I soggetti dopo 8 settimane di allenamento hanno fatto un altro test incrementale. Il dati hanno mostrato che Polimedicus non è molto affidabile, soprattutto l'HR. Nel secondo studio è stato sviluppato un nuovo programma, Inca, ed i risultati sono stati confrontati con i dati ottenuti dal primo studio con Polimedicus. I risultati finali hanno mostrato che Inca è più affidabile. Nel terzo studio, abbiamo voluto verificare l'esattezza del calcolo del FatMax con Inca e il test FATmaxwork. 25 soggetti in sovrappeso, tra 40-55 anni, sono stati arruolati e sottoposti al FATmaxwork test. Successivamente, è stato verificato se i valori estrapolati da INCA erano quelli che possono verificarsi durante un carico di prova costante di un'ora. L'analisi ha mostrato una precisione del calcolo della FatMax durante il carico di lavoro. Conclusione: E’ emersa una certa difficoltà nel determinare questo parametro, sia per la variabilità inter-individuale che intra-individuale. In futuro bisognerà migliorare INCA per ottenere protocolli di allenamento ancora più validi.

An interdisciplinary analysis of obesity: theory and empirical evidence

The dissertation is structured in three parts. The first part compares US and EU agricultural policies since the end of WWII. There is not enough evidence for claiming that agricultural support has a negative impact on obesity trends. I discuss the possibility of an exchange in best practices to fight obesity. There are relevant economic, societal and legal differences between the US and the EU. However, partnerships against obesity are welcomed. The second part presents a socio-ecological model of the determinants of obesity. I employ an interdisciplinary model because it captures the simultaneous influence of several variables. Obesity is an interaction of pre-birth, primary and secondary socialization factors. To test the significance of each factor, I use data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health. I compare the average body mass index across different populations. Differences in means are statistically significant. In the last part I use the National Survey of Children Health. I analyze the effect that family characteristics, built environment, cultural norms and individual factors have on the body mass index (BMI). I use Ordered Probit models and I calculate the marginal effects. I use State and ethnicity fixed effects to control for unobserved heterogeneity. I find that southern US States tend have on average a higher probability of being obese. On the ethnicity side, White Americans have a lower BMI respect to Black Americans, Hispanics and American Indians Native Islanders; being Asian is associated with a lower probability of being obese. In neighborhoods where trust level and safety perception are higher, children are less overweight and obese. Similar results are shown for higher level of parental income and education. Breastfeeding has a negative impact. Higher values of measures of behavioral disorders have a positive and significant impact on obesity, as predicted by the theory.