3 resultados para C-15-Acetogenin
em AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna
Resumo:
The nuclear signaling that is triggered in response to DNA damage entails the recruitment and assembly of repair proteins and the induction of genes involved in the activation of cell cycle checkpoint, apoptosis or senescence. The extensive changes in chromatin structure underlying these processes suggest that chromatin-modifying enzymes could be relevant targets of DNA damage-activated signaling. The acetyltransferases p300 and CBP participate in DNA damage-activated responses, including local histone hyperacetylation, cell cycle regulation, and co-activation of DNA damage activated proteins, such as p53, p73 and BRCA1. However, the link between DNA damage and p300/CBP activation has not been identified.We have detected p300 tyrosine phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. We show that the DNA damage-activated cAbl tyrosine kinase enters the nuclei of cells exposed to genotoxic agents and phosphorylates p300 on a tyrosine residue within the bromodomain that is conserved in p300, CBP and many other bromodomain-containing proteins. Antibodies against tyrosine phosphorylated p300/CBP show a DNA damage-inducible nuclear staining, suggesting that p300 tyrosine phosphorylation is an event linking DNA damage and chromatin modifications.
Resumo:
In Group B Streptococcus (GBS) three structurally distinct types of pili have been discovered as potential virulence factors and vaccine candidates. The pilus-forming proteins are assembled into high-molecular weight polymers via a transpeptidation mechanism mediated by specific class C sortases. Using a multidisciplinary approach including bioinformatics, structural and biochemical studies and in vivo mutagenesis we performed a broad characterization of GBS sortase C. The high resolution X-ray structure of the enzymes revealed that the active site, located into the β-barrel core of the enzyme, is made of the catalytic triad His157-Cys219-Arg228 and covered by a loop, known as the “lid”. We show that the catalytic triad and the predicted N- and C-terminal trans-membrane regions are required for the enzyme activity. Interestingly, by in vivo complementation mutagenesis studies we found that the deletion of the entire lid loop or mutations in specific lid key residues had no effect on catalytic activity of the enzyme. In addition, kinetic characterizations of recombinant enzymes indicate that the lid mutants can still recognize and cleave the substrate-mimicking peptide at least as well as the wild type protein.
Resumo:
The development of anti-IFNα antibodies is an occurrence described in chronic hepatitis C patients during treatment with Interferonα/PEG-Interferonα. However, its relevance, especially in difficult-to treat patients, has not been defined. Methods: We retrospectively measured the serum levels of anti-IFNα antibodies (baseline and week 12) and IFNα levels (week 12) by ELISA in 76 previous non-responders, and in 14 naive patients treated with Pegylated-IFNα and Ribavirin. A group of 57 healthy donors (HD) was also assessed as control. Positivity to anti-IFNα antibodies was established on the values of HD. Results: Baseline anti-IFNα antibodies were detected in 15.5% of patients and in 7% of HD, with significantly higher concentrations in patients than HD (181.5±389.9 vs 95.9±143.0 ng mL−1, p=0.0023). All positive patients were IFNα-experienced. At week 12, the prevalence of positivity increased to 22.3 and 28.5% in experienced and naïve patients, respectively, and the levels of anti-IFNα antibodies did not differ between the two groups (391±792.3 vs 384.7±662.6 ng mL−1, respectively). IFNα concentrations were significantly lower in antibody-positive patients than in antibody-negatives (988.2±1402 vs 3462±830.8 pg mL−1, p≤0.0001) and the levels of antibodies and IFNα were inversely correlated (r=-0.405, p=0.0001). The antibody-positive population clustered in null responders (67%) and 19/21 patients (90%) did not achieve SVR. Conclusions: The development of anti-IFNα antibodies is a non-negligible occurrence in patients treated with PEG-IFNα, is stable over time, and has a relevant clinical impact when associated with low levels of circulating PEG-IFNα. It should be considered in patients undergoing treatments including PEG-IFNα.