The frozen elephant trunk technique for the treatment of complex aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta pathologies: long term outcomes and distal reintervention

Background: The frozen elephant trunk(FET) technique is one of the last evolution in the treatment of complex pathologies of the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta.Materials and methods: Between January 2007 and March 2021, a total of 396 patients underwent total aortic arch replacements with the FET technique in our centre.The main indications were thoracic aortic aneurysm(n=104,28.2%), chronic aortic dissection(n=224,53.4%) and acute aortic dissection(n=68, 18.4%). We divided the population in two groups according the position of the distal anastomosis (zone 2 vs zone 3) and the length of the stent graft (< 150 mm vs > 150 mm): conservative group (Zone 2 anastomosis + stent length < 150mm, n. 140 pts) and aggressive group (zone 3 anastomosis + stent length > 150mm, n. 141). Results: The overall 30-day mortality rate was 13%(48/369); the risk factor analysis showed that an aggressive approach was neither a risk factor for major complication (permanent dialysis, tracheostomy, bowel malperfusion and permanent paraplegia) neither for 30-day mortality. The survival rate at 1, 5,10 and 15 years was 87.7%,75%,61.3% and 58.4% respectively. During the follow up, an aortic reintervention was performed in 122 patients (38%), 5 patients received a non-aortic cardiac surgery. Freedom from aortic reintervention at 1-,5- and 10-year was 77%,54% and 44% respectively. The freedom from aortic reintervention was higher in the ‘aggressive’ group (62.5%vs40.0% at 5 years, log-rank=0.056). An aggressive approach was not protective for aortic reintervention at follow up and for death at follow up. Conclusions: The FET technique represents a feasible and efficient option in the treatment of complex thoracic aortic pathologies. An aortic reintervention after FET is very common and the decision-making approach should consider and balance the higher risk of an aggressive approach in terms of post-operative complication versus the higher risk of a second aortic reintervention at follow-up.

Non-invasive detection of acute cell-mediated graft rejection in paediatric heart transplant recipients: the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Background and Aim: Acute cardiac rejection is currently diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), but multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be a non-invasive alternative by its capacity for myocardial structure and function characterization. Our primary aim was to determine the utility of multiparametric CMR in identifying acute graft rejection in paediatric heart transplant recipients. The second aim was to compare textural features of parametric maps in cases of rejection versus those without rejection. Methods: Fifteen patients were prospectively enrolled for contrast-enhanced CMR followed by EMB and right heart catheterization. Images were acquired on a 1,5 Tesla scanner including T1 mapping (modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence – MOLLI) and T2 mapping (modified GraSE sequence). The extracellular volume (ECV) was calculated using pre- and post-gadolinium T1 times of blood and myocardium and the patient’s hematocrit. Markers of graft dysfunction including hemodynamic measurements from echocardiography, catheterization and CMR were collated. Patients were divided into two groups based on degree of rejection at EMB: no rejection with no change in treatment (Group A) and acute rejection requiring new therapy (Group B). Statistical analysis included student’t t test and Pearson correlation. Results: Acute rejection was diagnosed in five patients. Mean T1 values were significantly associated with acute rejection. A monotonic, increasing trend was noted in both mean and peak T1 values, with increasing degree of rejection. ECV was significantly higher in Group B. There was no difference in T2 signal between two groups. Conclusion: Multiparametric CMR serves as a noninvasive screening tool during surveillance encounters and may be used to identify those patients that may be at higher risk of rejection and therefore require further evaluation. Future and multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these results and explore whether multiparametric CMR can decrease the number of surveillance EMBs in paediatric heart transplant recipients.