Rural governance and livelihoods systems diversification in the Western Balkans: comparative case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia

Agriculture is still important for socio-economic development in rural areas of Bosnia, Montenegro and Serbia (BMS). However, for sustainable rural development rural economies should be diversified so attention should be paid also to off-farm and non-farm income-generating activities. Agricultural and rural development (ARD) processes and farm activity diversification initiatives should be well governed. The ultimate objective of this work is to explore linkages between ARD governance and rural livelihoods diversification in BMS. The thesis is based on an extended secondary data analysis and surveys. Questionnaires for ARD governance and coordination were sent via email to public, civil society and international organizations. Concerning rural livelihood diversification, the field questionnaire surveys were carried out in three rural regions of BMS. Results show that local rural livelihoods are increasingly diversified but a significant share of households are still engaged in agriculture. Diversification strategies have a chance to succeed taking into consideration the three rural regions’ assets. However, rural households have to tackle many problems for developing new income-generating activities such as the lack of financial resources. Weak business skills are also a limiting factor. Fully exploiting rural economy diversification potential in BMS requires many interventions including improving rural governance, enhancing service delivery in rural areas, upgrading rural people’s human capital, strengthening rural social capital and improving physical capital, access of the rural population to finance as well as creating a favourable and enabling legal and legislative environment fostering diversification. Governance and coordination of ARD policy design, implementation and evaluation is still challenging in the three Balkan countries and this has repercussions also on the pace of rural livelihoods diversification. Therefore, there is a strong and urgent need for mobilization of all rural stakeholders and actors through appropriate governance arrangements in order to foster rural livelihoods diversification and quality of life improvement.

Transacciones, delegación o unilateralidad. Un análisis de los equilibrios de poder en las relaciones ejecutivo-legislativo durante los primeros gobiernos de Álvaro Uribe en Colombia y Carlos Saúl Menem en Argentina.

El presente trabajo analiza las relaciones entre poder ejecutivo y legislativo en los sistemas presidenciales, concentrándose específicamente en los casos de los primeros gobiernos de Álvaro Uribe Vélez en Colombia [2002-2006] y de Carlos Saúl Menem en Argentina [1989-1995]. Lo hace desde de una perspectiva analítica denominada neomadisoniana. Ubicada bajo el paraguas del neoinstitucionalismo, ésta utiliza como punto de partida el pensamiento de los padres fundadores de la democracia americana, particularmente el de James Madison, concentrándose en el estudio de como los arreglos institucionales constriñen el comportamiento de los actores a través del establecimiento de incentivos mediante los que se distribuyen distintos recursos de poder, proporcionando, además, una estructura estable, aunque no necesariamente eficiente, para la interacción humana. De este modo, el enfoque posee un particular interés por el análisis de la organización de los gobiernos, ya sea en términos de jerarquía o de transacciones entre actores instituciones [poderes ejecutivo y legislativo] que, de acuerdo al caso, gozan de distintos niveles de simetría y, consecuentemente, de capacidad de impactar sobre el proceso de toma de decisiones. Dentro de este marco, se intentarán identificar en el análisis de los casos patrones de regularidad y diferencia en relación a las características asumidas en el proceso de separación de poderes y el efecto que ejercen sobre él los poderes constitucionales y partidarios de los presidentes.