Il rapporto architettura – suolo nell’opera di Aldo Rossi

La ricerca muove dal presupposto che l’opera di Aldo Rossi sia stata analizzata finora secondo un criterio tipologico. Tale approccio è una tra le possibili chiavi di lettura del lavoro dell’architetto. Nel tentativo di individuare un’interpretazione dell’opera di Rossi legata a sistemi immutabili nel tempo si è ritenuto necessario approfondire la relazione che si stabilisce tra la sua opera e il suolo. Attraverso la definizione di due categorie di lettura dei progetti dell’autore, che si basano su continuità o discontinuità fisica del progetto rispetto al suolo, si comprende come il rapporto tra area e progetto produca nel tempo soluzioni ricorrenti. In base a questa interpretazione muro e pilastro costituiscono due elementi fondamentali del linguaggio di Rossi. Essi a loro volta si allacciano ad un sistema di riferimento più ampio di cui tettonica e arte muraria sono i capisaldi. La ricerca si articola in tre parti, all’interno delle quali sono sviluppati specifici capitoli. La prima parte, sistema di riferimento, è necessaria a delineare un vocabolario utile per isolare il tema trattato. Essa è fondamentale per comprendere la posizione occupata da Rossi rispetto alle esperienze verificatesi nel corso della storia, relativamente al rapporto spazio - architettura - suolo. La seconda parte, arte muraria, serve a mettere in luce l’influenza che la componente massiva e plastica del terreno ha determinato nella definizione di specifiche soluzioni progettuali. La terza parte, tettonica, delinea invece un approccio opposto al precedente, individuando quei progetti in cui il rapporto col suolo è stato sminuito o addirittura negato, aumentando il senso di sospensione dei volumi nello spazio. In definitiva, l’influenza che il rapporto col suolo ha determinato sulle scelte progettuali di Rossi rappresenta l’interrogativo principale di questa ricerca.

Rural development and communication: a community media project in Uttar Pradesh (India)

Loaded with 16% of the world’s population, India is a challenged country. More than a third of its citizens live below the poverty line - on less than a dollar a day. These people have no proper electricity, no proper drinking water supply, no proper sanitary facilities and well over 40% are illiterates. More than 65% live in rural areas and 60% earn their livelihood from agriculture. Only a meagre 3.63% have access to telephone and less than 1% have access to a computer. Therefore, providing access to timely information on agriculture, weather, social, health care, employment, fishing, is of utmost importance to improve the conditions of rural poor. After some introductive chapters, whose function is to provide a comprehensive framework – both theoretical and practical – of the current rural development policies and of the media situation in India and Uttar Pradesh, my dissertation presents the findings of the pilot project entitled “Enhancing development support to rural masses through community media activity”, launched in 2005 by the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Lucknow (U.P.) and by the local NGO Bharosa. The project scope was to involve rural people and farmers from two villages of the district of Lucknow (namely Kumhrava and Barhi Gaghi) in a three-year participatory community media project, based on the creation, implementation and use of a rural community newspaper and a rural community internet centre. Community media projects like this one have been rarely carried out in India because the country has no proper community media tradition: therefore the development of the project has been a challenge for the all stakeholders involved.

Antecedents and consequences of individual flexibility in project-based organizations

In the last decades, the increasing significance of “projectivization” (Lundin & Steinthórsson, 2003) has stimulated considerable interest in project-based organizations as new economic actors able to introduce a new logic of organizing work and weakening boundaries in favour of networks of collaborations. In these contexts, work is often delegated to project teams. Deciding whom to put on a project team is one of the biggest challenges faced by a project manager; in particular which characteristics rely on to compose and match effective teams. We address this issue, focusing on the individual flexibility (Raudsepp, 1990), as team composition variable that affects project team performance. Thus, the research question investigated is: Is it better to compose project teams with flexible team members or not flexible project team members to achieve higher levels of project performance? The temporary nature of PBOs involves that after achieving the purpose for which team members are enrolled, they are disbanded but their relationships remain, allowing them to be involved in future projects (Starkey, Barnatt & Tempest, 2000). Pre-existing relationships together with the current relationships create a network of relationships that yields some implications for project teams as well as for team members. We address this issue, exploring the following research question: To what extent is the individual flexibility influenced by the network structure? The conceptual framework is used to articulate the research questions investigated with respect to the Television drama serials production. Their project-team organizing combined with their capacity to dissolve and recreate over time make it an interesting field to develop. We contribute to the organizational literature, providing a clear operationalization of individual flexibility construct and its role on affecting project performance. Second, we contribute to the organizational network literature addressing the effects yielded by the network structure-structural holes and network closure- on the individual flexibility.