Contribution of vascular resident mesenchymal stromal cells to abdominal aortic aneurysm pathogenesis: increased MMP-9 expression and ineffective immunomodulation

Background. Ageing and inflammation are critical for the occurrence of aortic diseases. Extensive inflammatory infiltrate and excessive ECM proteloysis, mediated by MMPs, are typical features of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) have been detected within the vascular wall and represent attractive candidates for regenerative medicine, in virtue of mesodermal lineage differentiation and immunomodulatory activity. Meanwhile, many works have underlined an impaired MSC behaviour under pathological conditions. This study was aimed to define a potential role of vascular MSCs to AAA development. Methods. Aortic tissues were collected from AAA patients and healthy donors. Our analysis was organized on three levels: 1) histology of AAA wall; 2) detection of MSCs and evaluation of MMP-9 expression on AAA tissue; 3) MSC isolation from AAA wall and characterization for mesenchymal/stemness markers, MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and EMMPRIN. AAA-MSCs were tested for immunomodulation, when cultured together with activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). In addition, a co-colture of both healthy and AAA MSCs was assessed and afterwards MMP-2/9 mRNA levels were analyzed. Results. AAA-MSCs showed basic mesenchymal properties: fibroblastic shape, MSC antigens, stemness genes. MMP-9 mRNA, protein and enzymatic activity were significantly increased in AAA-MSCs. Moreover, AAA-MSCs displayed a weak immunosuppressive activity, as shown by PBMC ongoing along cell cycle. MMP-9 was shown to be modulated at the transcriptional level through the direct contact as well as the paracrine action of healthy MSCs. Discussion. Vascular injury did not affect the MSC basic phenotype, but altered their function, a increased MMP-9 expression and ineffective immunmodulation. These data suggest that vascular MSCs can contribute to aortic disease. In this view, the study of key processes to restore MSC immunomodulation could be relevant to find a pharmacological approach for monitoring the aneurysm progression.

Studio sul ruolo dei fattori genetici coinvolti nella Valvola Aortica Bicuspide e/o nell'Aneurisma dell'Aorta Toracica

La Valvola Aortica Bicuspide (BAV) rappresenta la più comune anomalia cardiaca congenita, con un’incidenza dello 0,5%-2% nella popolazione generale. Si caratterizza per la presenza di due cuspidi valvolari anziché tre e comprende diverse forme. La BAV è frequentemente associata agli aneurismi dell’aorta toracica (TAA). La dilatazione dell’aorta espone al rischio di sviluppare le complicanze aortiche acute. Materiali e metodi Sono stati reclutati 20 probandi consecutivi sottoposti a chirurgia della valvola aortica e dell'aorta ascendente presso l'Unità di Chirurgia Cardiaca di Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi di TAA associata a BAV. Sono stati esclusi individui con una condizione sindromica predisponente l’aneurisma aortico. Ciascun familiare maggiorenne di primo grado è stato arruolato nello studio. L’analisi di mutazioni dell’intero gene ACTA2 è stata eseguita con la tecnica del “bidirectional direct sequencing”. Nelle forme familiari, l’intera porzione codificante del genoma è stata eseguita usando l’exome sequencing. Risultati Dopo il sequenziamento di tutti i 20 esoni e giunzioni di splicing di ACTA2 nei 20 probandi, non è stata individuata alcuna mutazione. Settantasette familiari di primo grado sono stati arruolati. Sono state identificate cinque forme familiari. In una famiglia è stata trovata una mutazione del gene MYH11 non ritenuta patogenetica. Conclusioni La mancanza di mutazioni, sia nelle forme sporadiche sia in quelle familiari, ci suggerisce che questo gene non è coinvolto nello sviluppo della BAV e TAA e, l’associazione che è stata riportata deve essere considerata occasionale. L’architettura genetica della BAV verosimilmente dovrebbe consistere in svariate differenti varianti genetiche che interagiscono in maniera additiva nel determinare un aumento del rischio.

What are the components that contribute to variability in echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis?

INTRODUCTION Echocardiography is the standard clinical approach for quantification of the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). A comprehensive examination of its overall reproducibility and the simultaneous estimation of its variance components by multiple operators, readers, probe applications, and beats have not been undertaken. METHOD AND RESULTS Twenty-seven subjects with AS were scanned over 7 months in the echo-department by a median of 3 different operators. From each patient and each operator multiple runs of beats from multiple probe positions were stored for later analysis by multiple readers. The coefficient of variation was 13.3%, 15.9%, 17.6%, and 20.2% for the aortic peak velocity (Vmax), and velocity time integral (VTI), and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) Vmax and VTI respectively. The largest individual contributors to the overall variability were the beat-to-beat variability (9.0%, 9.3%, 9.5%, 9.4% respectively) and that of inability of an individual operator to precisely apply the probe to the same position twice (8.3%, 9.4%, 12.9%, 10.7% respectively). The tracing (inter-reader) and reader (inter-reader), and operator (inter-operator) contribution were less important. CONCLUSIONS Reproducibility of measurements in AS is poorer than often reported in the literature. The source of this variability does not appear, as traditionally believed, to result from a lack of training or operator and reader specific factors. Rather the unavoidable beat-to-beat biological variability, and the inherent impossibility of applying the ultrasound probe in exactly the same position each time are the largest contributors. Consequently, guidelines suggesting greater standardisation of procedures and further training for sonographers are unlikely to result in an improvement in precision. Clinicians themselves should be wary of relying on even three-beat averages as their expected coefficient of variance is 10.3% for the peak velocity at the aortic valve.

Key issues in diagnosing and treating acute aortic syndromes: results from the metropolitan area of Bologna network

Background: Survival of patients with Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS) may relate to the speed of diagnosis. Diagnostic delay is exacerbated by non classical presentations such as myocardial ischemia or acute heart failure (AHF). However little is known about clinical implications and pathophysiological mechanisms of Troponin T elevation and AHF in AAS. Methods and Results: Data were collected from a prospective metropolitan AAS registry (398 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2013). Troponin T values (either standard or high sensitivity assay, HS) were available in 248 patients (60%) of the registry population; the overall frequency of troponin positivity was 28% (ranging from 16% to 54%, using standard or HS assay respectively, p = 0.001). Troponin positivity was associated with a twofold increased risk of long in-hospital diagnostic time (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.05-3.52, p = 0.03), but not with in-hospital mortality. The combination of positive troponin and ACS-like ECG abnormalities resulted in a significantly increased risk of inappropriate therapy due to a misdiagnosis of ACS (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.12-5.54, p = 0.02). Patients with AHF were identified by the presence of dyspnea as presentation symptom or radiological signs of pulmonary congestion or cardiogenic shock. The overall frequency of AHF was 28 % (32% type A vs. 20% type B AAS, p = 0.01). AHF was due to a variety of pathophysiological mechanisms including cardiac tamponade (26%), aortic regurgitation (25%), myocardial ischemia (17%), hypertensive crisis (10%). AHF was associated with increased surgical delay and with increased risk of in-hospital death (adjusted OR 1.97 95% CI1.13-3.37,p=0.01). Conclusions: Troponin positivity (particularly HS) was a frequent finding in AAS. Abnormal troponin values were strongly associated with ACS-like ECG findings, in-hospital diagnostic delay, and inappropriate therapy. AHF was associated with increased surgical delay and was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as Bridge-to-Decision in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background. A sizable group of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) can undergo neither surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) nor transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) because of clinical contraindications. The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a “bridge-to-decision” in selected patients with severe AS and potentially reversible contraindications to definitive treatment. Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 645 patients who underwent first BAV at our Institution between July 2007 and December 2012. Of these, the 202 patients (31.2%) who underwent BAV as bridge-to-decision (BTD) requiring clinical re-evaluation represented our study population. BTD patients were further subdivided in 5 groups: low left ventricular ejection fraction; mitral regurgitation grade ≥3; frailty; hemodynamic instability; comorbidity. The main objective of the study was to evaluate how BAV influenced the final treatment strategy in the whole BTD group and in its single specific subgroups. Results. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 23.5±15.3%, mean age was 81±7 years. Mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47±17 mmHg to 33±14 mmHg. Of the 193 patients with BTD-BAV who received a second heart team evaluation, 72.5% were finally deemed eligible for definitive treatment (25.4%for AVR; 47.2% for TAVI): respectively, 96.7% of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction recovery; 70.5% of patients with mitral regurgitation reduction; 75.7% of patients who underwent BAV in clinical hemodynamic instability; 69.2% of frail patients and 68% of patients who presented relevant comorbidities. 27.5% of the study population was deemed ineligible for definitive treatment and treated with standard therapy/repeated BAV. In-hospital mortality was 4.5%, cerebrovascular accident occurred in 1% and overall vascular complications were 4% (0.5% major; 3.5% minor). Conclusions. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be considered as bridge-to-decision in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot be immediate candidates for definitive percutaneous or surgical treatment.