Studio immunologico per l'individuazione di pazienti trapiantati per cirrosi HBV relata che potrebbero sospedere la terapia con immunoglobine specifiche (HBIG)

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with poor graft and patient survival. Treatment with HBV-specific immunoglobulins (HBIG) in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogs is effective in preventing HBV reinfection of the graft and improving OLT outcome. However, the combined immunoprophylaxis has several limitations, mainly the high cost and the lack of standard schedules about duration. So far, the identification of markers able to predict the reinfection risk is needed. Although the HBV-specific immune response is believed to play an essential role in disease outcome, HBV-specific cellular immunity in viral containment in OLT recipients is unclear. To test whether or not OLT recipients maintain robust HBV-specific cellular immunity, the cellular immune response against viral nucleocapsid and envelope-protein of HBV was assessed in 15 OLT recipients and 27 individuals with chronic and 24 subjects with self-limited HBV infection, respectively. The data demonstrate that OLT recipients mounted fewer but stronger clusters of differentiation (CD)8 T cell responses than subjects with self-limited HBV infection and showed a preferential targeting of the nucleocapsid antigen. This focused response pattern was similar to responses seen in chronically infected subjects with undetectable viremia, but significantly different from patients who presented with elevated HBV viremia and who mounted mainly immune responses against the envelope protein. In conclusion, virus-specific CD4 T cell–mediated responses were only detected in subjects with self-limited HBV infection. Thus, the profile of the cellular immunity against HBV was in immune suppressed patients similar to subjects with chronic HBV infection with suppressed HBV-DNA.

Ruolo dell'Infliximab nella terapia della colite ulcerosa moderato-severa

Background: Almost 10-15% of patients with active Ulcerative Colitis are refractory to conventional therapy. Infliximab is a treatment of proven efficacy in this group of patients. Aims: To evaluate the role of Inliximab in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with chronically active moderate-severe Ulcerative Colitis. Materials and methods: 53 patients were enrolled, 47 patients entered the study and were treated with a dose of 5 mg/kg. The remission was evaluated through endoscopy and clinical criteria. (Mayo Score). The primary endpoint were clinical and endoscopic remission in moderate-severe Ulcerative Colitis refractory to standard therapy, the secondary out point was the maintenance of remission in the long period. Results: 47 patients started the study, 43 completed the study, 4 dropped out for worsening disease or adverse events; 27 patients were treated with 3 infusions, 9 patients with 4 infusions, 7 patients with > o = 5 infusions. 34 /47 patients (72.3%) were responders 12 (25.5%) improved their symptoms, 22 ( 46.8%) were in remission after the treatment. Among the responders, 21/34 (61.8%) stopped the steroid therapy after 3 infusions, the others reduced the dose or maintained just topic therapy. 13/47 patients (27.7%) were non responders (p <0.001). After 3 months all 22 patients which had reached remission maintained low Mayo Score; 10/12 (83.3%) patients with clinical response maintained their low score, 2 relapsed . Conclusions: Infliximab is a valid therapy for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and can avoid surgery in selected patients.

Effetti clinici e biologici della terapia epigenetica nelle sindromi mielodisplastiche a basso rischio

Background: Nucleoside 5-Azacitidine (5-Aza) in high risk MDS patients (pts) at a dose of 75mg/mq/day subcutaneously for 7 days, every 28 days, induces high hematologic response rates (hematologic improvement (HI) 50-60%, complete remission (CR) 10-30%) and prolongation of survival (at 2 years 50,8%). Aim: The role of 5-Aza in low-risk MDS patients is not well defined but its use in the earlier phases of disease could be more effective and useful to control the expansion of MDS clone and disease progression. In our phase II, prospective, multicentric trial a low-dose schedule of 5-Aza (75 mg/mq daily for 5 consecutive days every 28 days) was given to low-risk MDS pts in order to evaluate its efficacy and tolerability and to identify biological markers to predict the response. Methods: From September 2008 to February 2010, 34 patients were enrolled into the study. Fifteen patients had refractory anemia (RA), 5 patients refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS), 7 patients refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) and 7 patients refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 (RAEB-1). All patients failed previously EPO therapy and were in chronic red blood cell (RBC) supportive care with a median transfusions requirement of 4 units/monthly. The response treatment criteria was according to IWG 2006. Results: At present time 31 out of 34 pts are evaluable: 12/31 pts (39%) completed the treatment plan (8 courses), 7/31 pts (22%) performed the first 4 courses, 8/31 (26%) made 1 to 3 courses and 4/31 (13%) died during the treatment period. Out of 12 pts who completed the 8 courses of therapy 10 (83%) obtained an HI, 2/12 (17%) maintained a stable disease. Out of 10 pts who obtained HI, 4 pts (40%) achieved a CR. Generally the drug was very well tolerated. The most commonly reported hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (19%) but they were transitory and usually no delay of treatment was necessary. 2/4 pts died early after the 1th cycle for septic shock and gastrointestinal hemorrage respectively whereas 2/4 pts died in a condition of stable disease after the 4th cycle for pneumonia and respiratory distress. Samples for biologic studies have been collected from the pts before starting the therapy and at the end of 4th and 8th course. Preliminary data on the lipid signalling pathways suggested a direct correlation between PI-PLC-β1 gene expression and 5-Aza responsiveness. Conclusion: Interim analysis of our study based on the small number of cases who completed the treatment program, shows that 83% of pts obtain an HI and 40% obtain a CR. 4 patients died during the treatment and even if the causes were reported as no related to the therapy it has been considered that caution has to be reserved in given 5-Aza in these pts who are elderly and frail. Preliminary data of PI-PLC-β1 gene expression suggest that this and probably other biological markers could help us to know a priori who are the patients who have more chances to respond.

Impiego di cellule staminali in terapia veterinaria

Over the past few years, in veterinary medicine there has been an increased interest in understanding the biology of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This interest comes from their potential clinical use especially in wound repair, tissue engineering and application in therapeutics fields, including regenerative surgery. MSCs can be isolated directly from bone marrow aspirates, adipose tissue, umbilical cord and various foetal tissues. In this study, mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from equine bone marrow, adipose tissue, cord blood, Wharton’s Jelly and, for the first time, amniotic fluid. All these cell lines underwent in vitro differentiation in chondrocytes, osteocytes and adipocytes. After molecular characterization, cells resulted positive for mesenchymal markers such as CD90, CD105, CD44 and negative for CD45, CD14, CD34 and CD73. Adipose tissue and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were successfully applied in the treatment of tendinitis in race horses. Furthermore, for the first time in the horse, skin wounds of septicemic foal, were treated applying amniotic stem cells. Finally, results never reported have been obtained in the present study, isolating mesenchymal stem cells from domestic cat foetal fluid and membranes. All cell lines underwent in vitro differentiation and expressed mesenchymal molecular markers.

Fisiopatologia, clinica, storia naturale e terapia delle cardiomiopatie amiloidotiche

L’amiloidosi cardiaca è l’esempio tipico di cardiomiopatia infiltrativa. La diagnosi presuppone un alto indice di sospetto. Nella pratica clinica le cause più frequenti di amiloidosi sistemica sono: amiloidosi AL (secondaria alla deposizione di catene leggere libere circolanti delle immunoglobuline nel contesto di discrasia plasmocellulare), amiloidosi da deposizione di transtiretina mutata (amiloidosi ereditaria ATTR) e da deposizione di transtiretina nativa, “wild-type” (amiloidosi senile). L’ecocardiogramma, la lettura integrata ECG-ecocardiogramma e la risonanza magnetica forniscono importanti elementi per il sospetto diagnostico. La diagnosi finale deve essere necessariamente eziologica per poter orientare al meglio le strategie terapeutiche. L’amiloidosi ereditaria da mutazione della transtiretina (ATTRm) ha una espressione clinica prevalentemente neurologica. L’interessamento cardiaco è relativamente frequente (soprattutto nelle mutazioni diverse dalla Val30Met), ma è in genere successivo all’espressione del fenotipo neurologico. Se la cronologia di espressione dei due fenotipi si inverte, la probabilità di mancare la diagnosi di ATTRm è elevata. Nella realtà più del 10% dei pazienti affetti da ATTRm ha una espressione fenotipica prevalentemente o esclusivamente cardiologica. Questo sottogruppo si caratterizza per una netta prevalenza del sesso maschile, per una diagnosi in età più avanzata e per una frequenza particolarmente elevata della mutazione Ile68Leu. La consapevolezza dell’esistenza di queste forme di ATTRm è essenziale per una diagnosi corretta, soprattutto in ambito cardiologico.

Il Nilotinib nella terapia di prima linea della leucemia mieloide cronica

Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective BCR-ABL inhibitor. The phase 3 ENESTnd trial demonstrated superior efficacy nilotinib vs imatinib, with higher and faster molecular responses. After 24 months, the rates of progression to accelerated-blastic phase (ABP) were 0.7% and 1.1% with nilotinib 300mg and 400mg BID, respectively, significantly lower compared to imatinib (4.2%). Nilotinib has been approved for the frontline treatment of Ph+ CML. With imatinib 400mg (IRIS trial), the rate of any event and of progression to ABP were higher during the first 3 years. Consequently, a confirmation of the durability of responses to nilotinib beyond 3 years is extremely important. Aims: To evaluate the response and the outcome of patients treated for 3 years with nilotinib 400mg BID as frontline therapy. Methods: A multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT00481052). Minimum 36-month follow-up data for all patients will be presented. Definitions: Major Molecular Response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0,1%IS; Complete Molecular Response (CMR): undetectable transcript levels with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; failures: according to the revised ELN recommendations; events: failures and treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the analysis has been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: 73 patients enrolled: median age 51 years; 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. The cumulative incidence of CCgR at 12 months was 100%. CCgR at each milestone: 78%, 96%, 96%, 95%, 92% at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. The overall estimated probability of MMR was 97%, while the rates of MMR at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52%, 66%, 85%, 81% and 82%, respectively. The overall estimated probability of CMR was 79%, while the rates of CMR at 12 and 24 months were 12% and 27%, respectively. No patient achieving a MMR progressed to AP. Only one patient progressed at 6 months to ABP and subsequently died (high Sokal risk, T315I mutation). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate dose adaptations. During the first 12 months, the mean daily dose was 600-800mg in 74% of patients. The nilotinib last daily dose was as follows: 800mg in 46 (63%) patients, 600mg in 3 (4%) patients and 400mg in 18 (25%), 6 permanent discontinuations. Detail of discontinuation: 1 patient progressed to ABP; 3 patients had recurrent episodes of amylase and/or lipase increase (no pancreatitis); 1 patient had atrial fibrillation (unrelated to study drug) and 1 patient died after 32 months of mental deterioration and starvation (unrelated to study drug). Two patients are currently on imatinib second-line and 2 on dasatinib third-line. With a median follow-up of 39 months, the estimated probability of overall survival, progression-free survival and failure-free survival was 97%, the estimated probability of event-free survival was 91%. Conclusions: The rate of failures was very low during the first 3 years. Responses remain stable. The high rates of responses achieved during the first 12 months are being translated into optimal outcome for most of patients.