Design and characterization of polymorphs and co-crystals of organic molecular semiconductors

In the last decades, organic semiconductors have attracted attention due to their possible employment in solution-processed optoelectronic and electronic devices. One of the advantages of solution processing is the possibility to process into flexible substrates at low cost. Organic molecular materials tend to form polymorphs, which can exhibit very different properties. In most cases, the control of the crystal structure is decisive to maximize the performance of the final device. Although organic electronics have progressed a lot, n-type organic semiconductors still lag behind p-type, presenting challenges such as air instability and poor solubility. NDI derivatives are promising candidates for applications in organic electronics due to their characteristics. Recently, the structure-properties relationship and the polymorphism of these molecules have gained attention. In the first part of this thesis, NDI-C6 thermal behavior was extensively explored which revealed two different behaviors depending on the annealing process. This study allowed to define the stability ranking of the NDI-C6 bulk forms and to determine the crystal structure of Form γ at 54°C. Additionally, the polymorphic and thermal behavior of thin films of NDI-C6 was also explored. It was possible to isolate pure Form α, Form β, Form γ and a new metastable Form ε. It was also possible to determine the stability ranking of the phases in thin films. OFETs were fabricated having different polymorphs as active layer, unfortunately the performance was not ideal. During the second part of this thesis, core-chlorinated NDIs with fluoroalkyl chains were studied. Initially, the focus was on the polymorphism of CF3-NDI that revealed a solvate form with a very interesting molecular arrangement suggesting the possibility to form charge transfer co-crystals. In the last part of the thesis, the synthesis and characterization of CT co-crystal with different NDI derivatives, and acceptor and as donor BTBT and ditBu-BTBT were explored.

Comparative constitutional design for divided societies: a model to explain vonstitutional asymmetries

Comparative studies on constitutional design for divided societies indicate that there is no magic formula to the challenges that these societies pose, as lots of factors influence constitutional design. In the literature on asymmetric federalism, the introduction of constitutional asymmetries is considered a flexible instrument of ethnic conflict resolution, as it provides a mixture of the two main theoretical approaches to constitutional design for divided societies (i.e., integration and accommodation). Indeed, constitutional asymmetries are a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, as their degree of intensity can vary across constitutional systems, and there are both legal and extra-legal factors that may explain such differences. This thesis argues that constitutional asymmetries provide a flexible model of constitutional design and aims to explore the legal factors that are most likely to explain the different degrees of constitutional asymmetry in divided multi-tiered systems. To this end, the research adopts a qualitative methodology, i.e., Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), which allows an understanding of whether a condition or combination of conditions (i.e., the legal factors) determine the outcome (i.e., high, medium, low degree of constitutional asymmetry, or constitutional symmetry). The QCA is conducted on 16 divided multi-tiered systems, and for each case, the degree of constitutional asymmetry was analyzed by employing standardized indexes on subnational autonomy, allowing for a more precise measure of constitutional asymmetry than has previously been provided in the literature. Overall, the research confirms the complex nature of constitutional asymmetries, as the degrees of asymmetries vary substantially not only across systems but also within cases among the dimensions of subnational autonomy. The outcome of the Qualitative Comparative Analysis also confirms a path of complex causality since the different degrees of constitutional asymmetry always depend on several legal factors, that combined produce a low, medium, or high degree of constitutional asymmetry or, conversely, constitutional symmetry.