18 resultados para Cancer Chemotherapy
Resumo:
The treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is currently characterized by several drugs with different mechanisms of action, such as new generation hormonal agents (abiraterone, enzalutamide), chemotherapy (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), PARP inhibitors (olaparib) and radiometabolic therapies (radium-223, LuPSMA). There is an urgent need to identify biomarkers to guide personalized therapy in mCRPC. In recent years, the status of androgen receptor (AR) gene detected in liquid biopsy has been associated with outcomes in patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. More recently, plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) and its changes during treatment have been identified as early indicators of response to anticancer treatments. Recent works also suggested a potential role of tumor-related metabolic parameters of 18Fluoro-Choline Positron Emission Tomography (F18CH-PET)-computed tomography (CT) as a prognostic tool in mCRCP. Other clinical features, such as the presence of visceral metastases, have been correlated with outcome in mCRPC patients. Recent studies conducted by our research group have designed and validated a prognostic model based on the combination of molecular characteristics (ptDNA levels), metabolic features found in basal FCH PET scans (metabolic tumor volume values, MTV), clinical parameters (absence or presence of visceral metastases), and laboratory tests (serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, LDH). Within this PhD project, 30 patients affected by mCRPC, pre-treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, candidate for taxane-based treatments (docetaxel or cabazitaxel), have been prospectively evaluated. The prognostic model previously described was applied to this population, to interrogate its prognostic power in a more advanced cohort of patients, resulting in a further external validation of the tool.
Resumo:
Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in presence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases has been the standard in breast cancer (BC) patients for many years. Today, after the publication of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, ALND is a procedure restricted to a dwindling group of patients with a clearly metastatic axilla. Material and methods: This was a prospective observational trial involving two Italian Breast Units: Policlinico di Sant’Orsola and San Raffaele hospital. Objective was to evaluate that the omission of ALND in patients with cT1-2 cN0 BC undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and histological finding of metastases in 1 or 2 SLN is not associated with a worse prognostic outcome. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were disease free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence. All BC patients treated between the 1st of November 2020 and 31st of July 2023 with cT1-2 cN0 BC, preoperative negative axillary ultrasound and 1 or 2 metastatic SLN treated with sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) alone entered the study. Results: 795 cT1-2 cN0 BC patients underwent BCS and SLNB. Ninety patients were included. Median age was 60 (52-68) years. Seventy-five patients (83%) had T1 tumor and 15 (17%) T2. Median tumor size was 16 mm (11-19). The median SLN removed was 2 (1-3). Eighty-one patients had 1 positive SLN (90%), while 9 had 2 SLN metastasis (10%). 39 (43%) micrometastases were identified and 51 macrometastasis (57%). All patients underwent radiotherapy. Seventeen (19%) performed adjuvant chemotherapy. Two received immunotherapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Endocrine therapy was given to 84 (93%). At a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR 13-23) OS and DFS were 100%. No loco-regional recurrence was seen. Conclusion: The preliminary results of our study confirm that omitting ALND in patients meeting Z011 criteria is oncologically safe and should be the standard of care.
Resumo:
Background: The frontline management of non-oncogene addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves immunotherapy (ICI) alone or combined with chemotherapy (CT-ICI). As therapeutic options expand, refining NSCLC genotyping gains paramount importance. The dynamic landscape of KRAS-positive NSCLC presents a spectrum of treatment options, including ICI, targeted therapy, and combination strategies currently under investigation. Methods: The two-year RASLUNG project, featuring both retrospective and prospective cohorts, aimed to analyze the predictive and prognostic impact of KRAS mutations on tumor tissue and circulating DNA (ctDNA). Secondary objectives included assessing the roles of co-mutations and longitudinal changes in KRAS mutant copies concerning treatment response and survival outcomes. An external validation study confirmed the prognostic or predictive significance of co-mutations. Results: In the prospective cohort (n=24), patients with liver metastases exhibited significantly elevated ctDNA levels(p=0.01), while those with >3 metastatic sites showed increased Allele Frequency (AF) (P=0.002). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 33.3%. Higher AF correlated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.04, p = 0.03), though not progression. Notably, a reduction in plasma DNA levels was significantly associated with objective response(p=0.01). In the retrospective cohort, KRAS and STK11 mutations co-occurred in 14/21 patients (p=0.053). STK11 mutations were independently detrimental to OS (HR 1.97, p=0.025) after adjusting for various factors. KRAS tissue AF did not correlate with OS or PFS. Within the validation dataset, STK11 mutations were significantly associated with an increased risk of death in univariate (HR 2.01, p<0.001) and multivariate models (HR 1.66, p=0.001) after adjustments. Conclusion: The RAS-Lung Project, employing innovative genotyping techniques, underscores the significance of comprehensive NSCLC genotyping. Tailored next-generation sequencing (NGS) and ctDNA monitoring may offer potential benefits in navigating the evolving landscape of KRAS-positive NSCLC treatment.