The frozen elephant trunk technique for the treatment of complex aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta pathologies: long term outcomes and distal reintervention

Background: The frozen elephant trunk(FET) technique is one of the last evolution in the treatment of complex pathologies of the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta.Materials and methods: Between January 2007 and March 2021, a total of 396 patients underwent total aortic arch replacements with the FET technique in our centre.The main indications were thoracic aortic aneurysm(n=104,28.2%), chronic aortic dissection(n=224,53.4%) and acute aortic dissection(n=68, 18.4%). We divided the population in two groups according the position of the distal anastomosis (zone 2 vs zone 3) and the length of the stent graft (< 150 mm vs > 150 mm): conservative group (Zone 2 anastomosis + stent length < 150mm, n. 140 pts) and aggressive group (zone 3 anastomosis + stent length > 150mm, n. 141). Results: The overall 30-day mortality rate was 13%(48/369); the risk factor analysis showed that an aggressive approach was neither a risk factor for major complication (permanent dialysis, tracheostomy, bowel malperfusion and permanent paraplegia) neither for 30-day mortality. The survival rate at 1, 5,10 and 15 years was 87.7%,75%,61.3% and 58.4% respectively. During the follow up, an aortic reintervention was performed in 122 patients (38%), 5 patients received a non-aortic cardiac surgery. Freedom from aortic reintervention at 1-,5- and 10-year was 77%,54% and 44% respectively. The freedom from aortic reintervention was higher in the ‘aggressive’ group (62.5%vs40.0% at 5 years, log-rank=0.056). An aggressive approach was not protective for aortic reintervention at follow up and for death at follow up. Conclusions: The FET technique represents a feasible and efficient option in the treatment of complex thoracic aortic pathologies. An aortic reintervention after FET is very common and the decision-making approach should consider and balance the higher risk of an aggressive approach in terms of post-operative complication versus the higher risk of a second aortic reintervention at follow-up.

Late onset spinal cord ischemia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm open repair

The aim of this study is to evaluate if spinal cord ischemia (SCI), especially its late presentation, and can be correlated to the results of intraoperative evoked potential monitoring (IOM). Methods. This study is a physician-initiated, retrospective, single-center, non-randomized study. Data from all patients undergoing a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgical repair (TAAA SR) between January 2016 and March 2020 IOM was collected and analyzed. Results. During the study period, 261 patients underwent TAAA SR with MEP/SSEPs monitoring [190 males, 73%; median age 65 (57-71)]. Thirty-seven patients suffered from SCI, for an overall rate of 14% (permanent 9%). When stratifying patients according to the SCI onset, 18 patients presented with an early (11 permanent) and 19 with a late SCI (<24h) (11 permanent). Of 261 patients undergoing TAAA SR with IOM, 15 were excluded due to changes in the upper extremity motor evoked potentials. For the remaining 246, the association between SCI and IOM was investigated: only irreversible IOM loss without peripheral changes have been found to be a risk factor for late onset SCI (p=.006). Furthermore, given that no statistical differences were found between the two groups when no IOM changes were recorded (p=.679), this situation cannot reliably rule out any SCI in our cohort. Independent risk factors for late spinal cord ischemia onset found at multivariate analysis were smoking history (p=.008), BMI>28 (p=.048) and TAAA extent II (p=.009). The irreversible MEP change without peripheral showed a trend of significance (p=.052). Conclusions. Evoked potential intraoperative monitoring is an important adjunct during thoracoabdominal aortic open repair to predict and possibly prevent spinal cord ischemia. Irreversible IOM loss without peripheral changes was predictive of late SCI, therefore more attention should be paid to the postoperative management of this subgroup of patients.