Effects of recovery mode on performance, O2 uptake, and O2 deficit during high-intensity intermittent exercise

[EN] The aim of this study was to determine the influence of activity performed during the recovery period on the aerobic and anaerobic energy yield, as well as on performance, during high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIT). Ten physical education students participated in the study. First they underwent an incremental exercise test to assess their maximal power output (Wmax) and VO2max. On subsequent days they performed three different HITs. Each HIT consisted of four cycling bouts until exhaustion at 110% Wmax. Recovery periods of 5 min were allowed between bouts. HITs differed in the kind of activity performed during the recovery periods: pedaling at 20% VO2max (HITA), stretching exercises, or lying supine. Performance was 3-4% and aerobic energy yield was 6-8% (both p < 0.05) higher during the HITA than during the other two kinds of HIT. The greater contribution of aerobic metabolism to the energy yield during the high-intensity exercise bouts with active recovery was due to faster VO2 kinetics (p< 0.01) and a higher VO2peak during the exercise bouts preceded by active recovery (p < 0.05). In contrast, the anaerobic energy yield (oxygen deficit and peak blood lactate concentrations) was similar in all HITs. Therefore, this study shows that active recovery facilitates performance by increasing aerobic contribution to the whole energy yield turnover during high-intensity intermittent exercise.

Pastaje (grazing) del microzooplancton en aguas de las Islas Canarias

[EN]The impact of micrograzers upon primary production was measured north of the Canary Islands during 2010 and 2011 using the dilution technique. Grazing was estimated from chlorophyll a but also taking into account the different phototrophic organisms, that is, Synechococcus (Syn), Prochlorococcus (Pro), autotrophic picoeukaryotes (APE) and autotrophic nanoflagellates (ANF). Some experiments showed significant values of grazing upon Syn, Pro or APE although no significant grazing was measured on chlorophyll a. Furthermore, a positive relationship, this means growth instead of grazing, was observed in Syn and Pro in two experiments. Grazing on heterotrophic prokaryotes was also determined and the obtained values were always highly significant. These results showed that the impact of micrograzers upon primary production is a complex process which involves a different grazing pressure upon phytoplankton groups. Therefore, a detailed analysis of the pico, nano and microplanktonic community is essential to really understand the role of micrograzers and the trophic interactions among these groups in subtropical waters.