1 resultado para bow, court, epic, lute, naskh script
em Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (206)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (5)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (53)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (21)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (18)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (51)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (10)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (6)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (6)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (5)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (15)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (53)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (87)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (91)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (11)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (9)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (33)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (113)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
[EN]The submitted paper deals with analysis of grammatical means of textual cohesion in English in a specific genre of legal register, i.e. in appellate court decisions. The theoretical framework of analysis is the theory of textual cohesion introduced by Halliday and Hasan in their work Cohesion in English (1976), which considers only intersentence cohesive ties to be textually cohesive and which distinguishes four categories of grammatical cohesion: reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. In the analysed texts, all the instances of these four categories of grammatical cohesion are identified and statistically evaluated. The aim of the analysis is twofold.