1 resultado para Power tool industry
em Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ANIMAL PRODUCTION JOURNAL (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (12)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (46)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital - Universidad Icesi - Colombia (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (23)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (17)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (18)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (25)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (383)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (49)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (13)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (22)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (48)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
Elasmobranch stock assessment studies are usually made through fisheries surveys data. However, in large marine protected areas (MPAs) the use of destructive techniques must be dismissed in order to avoid population impacts. In 2005, while conducting a marine habitat survey in two marine Special Areas of Conservation (Sebadales de Playa de Inglés and Franja Marina de Mogán) in south Gran Canary Island (Canary Islands, Spain) with underwater towed video (UTV) and underwater visual census (UVC) transects, we recognized the opportunity rose to assess elasmobranch populations through UTV. Number of observed species and specimens, overall field work effort and total surveyed area were determined and compared between methods. Mean observations per day per unit of time (MOPUT) and mean observations per day per unit of surveyed area (MOPUA) were also compared through Mann–Whitney rank sum statistical test (α=0.05). Data analysis demonstrated that UTV is a very useful tool to rapidly assess elasmobranch populations in large MPAs in good visibility underwater environments. It can assess larger areas than UVC with the same effort (statistically significant difference found for the MOPUT; p=<0.001), leading to more observed species (5 vs 2) and specimens (46 vs 3) per day of work, with no loss in resolution power (MOPUA values were not significantly different between UTV and UVC; p=0.104).