11 resultados para Paradigmas científicos
em Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España
Resumo:
[ES] Se debatió sobre las situación actual de las publicaciones científicas en España del ámbito de la educación física y del deporte. También se debatió del papel de los investigadores y su producción. Contiene: Inauguración del Seminario Análisis de las revistas españolas de Ciencias de la actividad física y el deporte. El caso Apunts/Javier Olivera Beltrán. Publicación de artículos científicos en revistas especializadas relacionadas con el entrenamiento deportivo/Juan Manuel García. Los contenidos y estructura de la revista "Acción motriz"/José Hernández Moreno y Antonio González Molina. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte/ Vicente Martínez de Haro. Publicar en revistas especializadas del ámbito de la Educación Física y Deportiva/José Devís Devís. El camino hacia la evaluación de las revistas científicas españolas en E.F y Deportes/ Julio A. Martínez Morilla. Incorp Tecn de Red de Trab a través de Rep Inst en Rev de la Act Fís y Dep: Proy JHPE/José Pérez Turpín, Juan Chinchilla Mira. How to get a paper published in EPER... and other English-speaking (Impact Factor) journals/Ken Green. Conclusiones del Seminario.
Resumo:
[EN]This paper examines a corpus of 150 titles of research articles published between 2010 and 2013 in Anglo-American natural sciences journals (physics, chemistry and biology) in order to determine their lexical density and grammatical and morphosyntactic features. Towards that end, the frequency of present and past participles, prepositions, coordinating and subordinate conjunctions, and the frequency and length of compound words was recorded in each title. The total number of content and function words was also recorded so as to determine title lexical density. ANOVA tests were applied in order to assess whether statistically significant differences in the frequency of the above mentioned variables were detected within and across disciplines and in the whole corpus.
Resumo:
[EN]This paper proposes an alternative bibliometric indicator for evaluating scholarly journals based on the percentage of highly cited articles in a journal. It compares such an index with the impact factor and the h-index by using different time windows and levels of citation that can determine when a document can be considered as highly cited compared to others of the same year and discipline. The main outcome of this comparison suggests that the best index for obtaining data distributions that are comparable between scientific fields is by taking the 20% citation percentile over a three-year time frame for considering citations.