1 resultado para Cross disciplinary
em Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (81)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (17)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Brock University, Canada (22)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (95)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (69)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (32)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (4)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (7)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (13)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (11)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (3)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (4)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (26)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (85)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade do Minho (20)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (243)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (17)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (85)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
Relevância:
Resumo:
[EN] This paper describes the use of perhaps, maybe and possibly in a cross-disciplinary corpus of academic and popularised scientific writing. It accounts for their higher frequency in popularised discourse by investigating their functions in detail. The analysis, conducted from various perspectives (syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and rhetorical), suggests that two factors are at work: the evidential basis for the epistemic assessment and the mode of discourse the marker is most closely associated with.