Innate Immunity in Insects, Function and Regulation of Hemolin from Hyalophora cecropia

Insects are useful models for the study of innate immune reactions and development. The distinction between recognition mechanisms preceding the breakdown of apoptotic cells during metamorphosis, and the breakdown of cells in response to infections, is unclear. Hemolin, a Lepidopteran member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is a candidate molecule in self/nonself recognition. This thesis investigates hemolin function and hemolin gene regulation at a molecular level. We investigated the binding and cell adhesion properties of hemolin from H. cecropia and demonstrated that the proteins could homodimerize in presence of calcium. Moreover, a higher molecular weight membrane form of hemolin was present on hemocytes. These results, taken together with an earlier finding that soluble hemolin inhibits hemocyte adhesion, indicated that the secreted hemolin could modulate hemocyte aggregation in a competitive manner in the blood. In addition, hemolin was expressed in different tissues and at different developmental stages. Since hemolin is expressed both during development and during the immune response, its different regulatory factors must act in concert. We found that the third intron contains an enhancer, through which Dif, C/EBP and HMGI synergistically activate a reporter construct in vitro. We concluded that the enhancer is used during infection, since the κB-site is crucial for an immune response. Interestingly, we also found that the active form of the steroid hormone, ecdysone, induces the hemolin gene transcription in vivo, and in addition, acts synergistically during bacterial infection. Preliminary in vivo results indicate a secondary effect of ecdysone and the importance of hormone receptor elements in the upstream promoter region of hemolin. To explore the use of Drosophila as a genetic tool for understanding hemolin function and regulation, we sought to isolate the functional homologue in this species. A fly cDNA library in yeast was screened using H. cecropia hemolin as bait. The screen was not successful. However, it did lead to the discovery of a Drosophila protein with true binding specificity for hemolin. Subsequent characterization revealed a new, highly conserved gene, which we named yippee. Yippee is distantly related to zinc finger proteins and represents a novel family of proteins present in numerous eukaryotes, including fungi, plants and humans. Notably, when the Drosophila genome sequence was revealed, no hemolin orthologue could be detected. Finally, an extensive Drosophila genome chip analysis was initiated. The goal was to investigate the Drosophila immune response, and, in contrast to earlier studies of artificially injected flies, to examine a set of natural microbes, orally and externally applied. In parallel experiments viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites were compared to unchallenged controls. We obtained a unique set of genes that were up-regulated in the response to the parasite Octosporea muscadomesticae and to the fungus Beauveria bassiana. We expect both down-regulated and up-regulated genes to serve as a source for the discovery of new effector molecules, in particular those that are active against parasites and fungi.

Chromatin Remodeling by BRG1 and SNF2H : Biochemistry and Function

Chromatin is a highly dynamic, regulatory component in the process of transcription, repair, recombination and replication. The BRG1 and SNF2H proteins are ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins that modulate chromatin structure to regulate DNA accessibility for DNA-binding proteins involved in these processes. The BRG1 protein is a central ATPase of the SWI/SNF complexes involved in chromatin remodeling associated with regulation of transcription. SWI/SNF complexes are biochemically hetero-geneous but little is known about the unique functional characteristics of the various forms. We have shown that SWI/SNF activity in SW13 cells affects actin filament organization dependent on the RhoA signaling pathway. We have further shown that the biochemical composition of SWI/SNF complexes qualitatively affects the remodeling activity and that the composition of biochemically purified SWI/SNF complexes does not reflect the patterns of chromatin binding of individual subunits. Chromatin binding assays (ChIP) reveal variations among subunits believed to be constitutive, suggesting that the plasticity in SWI/SNF complex composition is greater than suspected. We have also discovered an interaction between BRG1 and the splicing factor Prp8, linking SWI/SNF activity to mRNA processing. We propose a model whereby parts of the biochemical heterogeneity is a result of function and that the local chromatin environment to which the complex is recruited affect SWI/SNF composition. We have also isolated the novel B-WICH complex that contains WSTF, SNF2H, the splicing factor SAP155, the RNA helicase II/Guα, the transcription factor Myb-binding protein 1a, the transcription factor/DNA repair protein CSB and the RNA processing factor DEK. The formation of this complex is dependent on active transcription and links chromatin remodeling by SNF2H to RNA processing. By linking chromatin remodeling complexes with RNA processing proteins our work has begun to build a bridge between chromatin and RNA, suggesting that factors in chromatin associated assemblies translocate onto the growing nascent RNA.

Global trade, food production and ecosystem support : Making the interactions visible

Modern food production is a complex, globalized system in which what we eat and how it is produced are increasingly disconnected. This thesis examines some of the ways in which global trade has changed the mix of inputs to food and feed, and how this affects food security and our perceptions of sustainability. One useful indicator of the ecological impact of trade in food and feed products is the Appropriated Ecosystem Areas (ArEAs), which estimates the terrestrial and aquatic areas needed to produce all the inputs to particular products. The method is introduced in Paper I and used to calculate and track changes in imported subsidies to Swedish agriculture over the period 1962-1994. In 1994, Swedish consumers needed agricultural areas outside their national borders to satisfy more than a third of their food consumption needs. The method is then applied to Swedish meat production in Paper II to show that the term “Made in Sweden” is often a misnomer. In 1999, almost 80% of manufactured feed for Swedish pigs, cattle and chickens was dependent on imported inputs, mainly from Europe, Southeast Asia and South America. Paper III examines ecosystem subsidies to intensive aquaculture in two nations: shrimp production in Thailand and salmon production in Norway. In both countries, aquaculture was shown to rely increasingly on imported subsidies. The rapid expansion of aquaculture turned these countries from fishmeal net exporters to fishmeal net importers, increasingly using inputs from the Southeastern Pacific Ocean. As the examined agricultural and aquacultural production systems became globalized, levels of dependence on other nations’ ecosystems, the number of external supply sources, and the distance to these sources steadily increased. Dependence on other nations is not problematic, as long as we are able to acknowledge these links and sustainably manage resources both at home and abroad. However, ecosystem subsidies are seldom recognized or made explicit in national policy or economic accounts. Economic systems are generally not designed to receive feedbacks when the status of remote ecosystems changes, much less to respond in an ecologically sensitive manner. Papers IV and V discuss the problem of “masking” of the true environmental costs of production for trade. One of our conclusions is that, while the ArEAs approach is a useful tool for illuminating environmentally-based subsidies in the policy arena, it does not reflect all of the costs. Current agricultural and aquacultural production methods have generated substantial increases in production levels, but if policy continues to support the focus on yield and production increases alone, taking the work of ecosystems for granted, vulnerability can result. Thus, a challenge is to develop a set of complementary tools that can be used in economic accounting at national and international scales that address ecosystem support and performance. We conclude that future resilience in food production systems will require more explicit links between consumers and the work of supporting ecosystems, locally and in other regions of the world, and that food security planning will require active management of the capacity of all involved ecosystems to sustain food production.