1 resultado para source and sink
em Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (21)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (15)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (19)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (43)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (40)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (55)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (16)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (21)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (13)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (11)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (21)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, Brazil - Carpe dIEN (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (18)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (7)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (103)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (8)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (221)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (28)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (10)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (22)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (46)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (25)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
With the development of the Internet-of-Things, more and more IoT platforms come up with different structures and characteristics. Making balance of their advantages and disadvantages, we should choose the suitable platform in differ- ent scenarios. For this project, I make comparison of a cloud-based centralized platform, Microsoft Azure IoT hub and a fully distributed platform, Sensi- bleThings. Quantitative comparison is made for performance by 2 scenarios, messages sending speed adds up, devices lie in different location. General com- parison is made for security, utilization and the storage. Finally I draw the con- clusion that SensibleThings performs more stable when a lot of messages push- es to the platform. Microsoft Azure has better geographic expansion. For gener- al comparison, Microsoft Azure IoT hub has better security. The requirement of local device for Microsoft Azure IoT hub is lower than SensibleThings. The SensibleThings are open source and free while Microsoft Azure follow the con- cept “pay as you go” with many throttling limitations for different editions. Microsoft is more user-friendly.