1 resultado para Source and sink
em Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ANIMAL PRODUCTION JOURNAL (2)
- Aquatic Commons (11)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (10)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (8)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (15)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (46)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (107)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (16)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (8)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (11)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (16)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (93)
- Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, Brazil - Carpe dIEN (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (70)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (53)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (99)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (59)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (14)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
With the development of the Internet-of-Things, more and more IoT platforms come up with different structures and characteristics. Making balance of their advantages and disadvantages, we should choose the suitable platform in differ- ent scenarios. For this project, I make comparison of a cloud-based centralized platform, Microsoft Azure IoT hub and a fully distributed platform, Sensi- bleThings. Quantitative comparison is made for performance by 2 scenarios, messages sending speed adds up, devices lie in different location. General com- parison is made for security, utilization and the storage. Finally I draw the con- clusion that SensibleThings performs more stable when a lot of messages push- es to the platform. Microsoft Azure has better geographic expansion. For gener- al comparison, Microsoft Azure IoT hub has better security. The requirement of local device for Microsoft Azure IoT hub is lower than SensibleThings. The SensibleThings are open source and free while Microsoft Azure follow the con- cept “pay as you go” with many throttling limitations for different editions. Microsoft is more user-friendly.