Clinical and pathological importance of vacA allele heterogeneity and cagA status in peptic ulcer disease in patients from North Brazil

We have examined the prevalence of gene cagA and vacA alleles in 129 patients, 69 with gastritis and 60 with peptic ulcer diseases from North Brazil and their relation with histopathological data. vacA and cagA genotype were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was used for histological diagnosis. 96.6% of the patients were colonized by Helicobacter pylori strains harboring single vacA genotype (nont-mixed infection). Among them, 11.8% had subtype s1a, 67.8% had subtype s1b, and 17% subtype s2. In regard to the middle region analysis, m1 alleles were found in 75.4% and m2 in 21.2% of patients. The cagA gene was detected in 78% patients infected with H. pylori and was associated with the s1-m1 vacA genotype. The H. pylori strains, vacA s1b m1/cagA-positive, were associated with increased risk of peptic ulcer disease and higher amounts of lymphocytic and neutrophilic infiltrates and the presence of intestinal metaplasia. These findings show that cagA and vacA genotyping may have clinical relevance in Brazil.

Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations

OBJETIVO: Comparar o perfil lipídico e risco coronariano de uma população ribeirinha (Vigia) ao de uma população urbana (Belém). MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 50 indivíduos de cada região, controlados por idade e sexo, examinando-se os principais fatores de risco para a doença coronariana. RESULTADOS: Segundo o Programa Nacional de Educação sobre o Colesterol (NCEP III) e determinando-se o escore de Framingham, ambas as populações expressaram o mesmo risco absoluto de eventos (Vigia 5,4 ± 1 vs. Belém 5,7 ± 1), a despeito da população de Vigia apresentar menor consumo de gordura saturada (p<0,0001), maior de mono e poliinsaturada (p<0,03), além de menores valores do índice de massa corpórea (25,4±0,6 vs. 27,6±0,7kg/m², p<0,02), da prega biceptal (18,6±1,1 vs. 27,5±1,3mm, p<0,0001) e triceptal (28,7±1,2 vs. 37,3±1,7mm, p<0,002), de colesterol total (205±5 vs. 223±6mg/dL, p< 0,03) e triglicérides (119 ± 9 vs. 177±18mg/dL, p<0,005), não diferindo no HDL-c (46±1 vs. 46±1mg/dL), LDL-c (135 ± 4 vs. 144 ± 5mg/dL) e pressão arterial (PAS 124 ± 3 vs. 128 ± 3mmHg; PAD 80 ± 2 vs. 82 ± 2mmHg). CONCLUSÃO: A população ribeirinha e urbana da Amazônia apresentaram risco cardiovascular semelhante. Entretanto, a marcante diferença entre as variáveis estudadas sugere que devam ser aplicadas diferentes estratégias de prevenção.