Influência das temperaturas mínima e máxima em características de qualidade industrial e em rendimentos de grãos de trigo

Na região tritícola sul-brasileira predominam invernos com temperatura baixa (mínima absoluta, em dias com geada, de até - 8,0ºC). No entanto, a incidência de elevada temperatura (máxima absoluta, em dias isolados entre outubro e novembro, de até 41,0ºC) pode ser encontrada durante todo o período de enchimento de grãos e na maturação fisiológica. Este trabalho teve por objetivos verificar a influência das temperaturas mínima e máxima na qualidade industrial e no rendimento de grãos. Foram usados dados de experimentos com trigo Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) 16, conduzidos nos anos de 1990 a 1998, em sete locais do Rio Grande do Sul e em quatro locais de Santa Catarina. A análise estatística realizada foi correlações múltiplas. Verificou-se que, nos diferentes períodos analisados: a) o aumento da temperatura máxima média resultou em acréscimo do peso de mil grãos, do rendimento de grãos, da força geral de glúten, da microssedimentação com dodecil sulfato de sódio e do número de queda: b) o peso do hectolitro (exceção feita ao período final de maturação fisiológica), o peso de mil grãos, o número de queda e a extração experimental de farinha foram influenciados negativamente pela temperatura mínima média; c) a temperatura mínima média influenciou positivamente a força geral de glúten, a relação P/L e a microssedimentação com dodecil sulfato de sódio.

Evolução do peso corporal e desenvolvimento da mandíbula de ratos em função da administração de flúor.

The body weights evolution and the development of mandible were analyzed in rats that received 0.25 mg F contained into a commercial product, during 30 and 60 days consecutively, beginning at birth. The study presented the following conclusions: 1. The treated animals showed body weights always inferior to the controls, with more evident difference at 60 days period; 2. Analysis showed a reduction in the horizontal linear measurements, but not in the length of the mandibular diastem. No influence was observed in relation to the verticals.

Perioperative fluid therapy: a statement from the international fluid optimization group

Perioperative fluid therapy remains a highly debated topic. Its purpose is to maintain or restore effective circulating blood volume during the immediate perioperative period. Maintaining effective circulating blood volume and pressure are key components of assuring adequate organ perfusion while avoiding the risks associated with either organ hypo- or hyperperfusion. Relative to perioperative fluid therapy, three inescapable conclusions exist: overhydration is bad, underhydration is bad, and what we assume about the fluid status of our patients may be incorrect. There is wide variability of practice, both between individuals and institutions. The aims of this paper are to clearly define the risks and benefits of fluid choices within the perioperative space, to describe current evidence-based methodologies for their administration, and ultimately to reduce the variability with which perioperative fluids are administered. Based on the abovementioned acknowledgements, a group of 72 researchers, well known within the field of fluid resuscitation, were invited, via email, to attend a meeting that was held in Chicago in 2011 to discuss perioperative fluid therapy. From the 72 invitees, 14 researchers representing 7 countries attended, and thus, the international Fluid Optimization Group (FOG) came into existence. These researches, working collaboratively, have reviewed the data from 162 different fluid resuscitation papers including both operative and intensive care unit populations. This manuscript is the result of 3 years of evidence-based, discussions, analysis, and synthesis of the currently known risks and benefits of individual fluids and the best methods for administering them. The results of this review paper provide an overview of the components of an effective perioperative fluid administration plan and address both the physiologic principles and outcomes of fluid administration. We recommend that both perioperative fluid choice and therapy be individualized. Patients should receive fluid therapy guided by predefined physiologic targets. Specifically, fluids should be administered when patients require augmentation of their perfusion and are also volume responsive. This paper provides a general approach to fluid therapy and practical recommendations.