8 resultados para Reflexive modernity
em Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho"
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Comunicação - FAAC
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Ciências Sociais - FFC
Resumo:
Based on the reflections of Habermas and his conception of modernity, understood as an unfinished project, Giddens stresses that in all societies the maintenance of personal identity and its connection to broader social identities is a primordial requirement for ontological security. To achieve ontological security, modernity had to (re) invent traditions and get away from genuine traditions, that is, those values radically linked to the pre-modern past. This is a character of the discontinuity of modernity, the separation between what is presented as the new and that which persists as the legacy of the old. This article discusses the relationship between tradition and modernity and the dialogue between Giddens and Habermas. The goal is to identify the points of contact and the differences in the theses defended by both authors, in order to assess their contributions to discussions of the rationalization of contemporary societies. Late or reflexive modernity is an uninterrupted process of changes that affect the foundations of Western society. Faced with a reality of constant change, it is necessary to choose between the certainty of the past and a new reality of continuous change. In this sense, and according to the Habermasian perspective, the reflexive character of modernity is found in this process of choosing between the certainties inherited from the past and new social forms, a process that that leads to the reflection on - or even the recasting of - social practices, causing the rationalization and (re) invention of various aspects of life in society.
Resumo:
O objetivo principal deste artigo é levantar algumasexplicações possíveis para o sucesso editorial do segmento daautoajuda a partir das últimas décadas do século passado. Paratanto, quatro eixos explicativos são desenvolvidos: 1) vivemos umperíodo de reflexividade que abre espaço para as receitas e osmodelos da autoajuda; 2) outras formas de racionalidade, numacontraposição à visão de Max Weber, abrem espaço para o saberprofessado pelos gurus da autoajuda; 3) a autoajuda tem umafunção terapêutica fundamental numa época que vive os dilemasda modernidade tardia; 4) o modelo de competência que imperano imaginário organizacional contemporâneo abre espaço paraos ensinamentos da autoajuda. Rastreando essas explicaçõesprocurar-se-á mostrar de que forma as especificidades do nossotempo constituem terreno fértil para a autoajuda.
Resumo:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
Resumo:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)