Safety illusion and error trap in a collectively-operated machine accident

Workplace accidents involving machines are relevant for their magnitude and their impacts on worker health. Despite consolidated critical statements, explanation centered on errors of operators remains predominant with industry professionals, hampering preventive measures and the improvement of production-system reliability. Several initiatives were adopted by enforcement agencies in partnership with universities to stimulate production and diffusion of analysis methodologies with a systemic approach. Starting from one accident case that occurred with a worker who operated a brake-clutch type mechanical press, the article explores cognitive aspects and the existence of traps in the operation of this machine. It deals with a large-sized press that, despite being endowed with a light curtain in areas of access to the pressing zone, did not meet legal requirements. The safety devices gave rise to an illusion of safety, permitting activation of the machine when a worker was still found within the operational zone. Preventive interventions must stimulate the tailoring of systems to the characteristics of workers, minimizing the creation of traps and encouraging safety policies and practices that replace judgments of behaviors that participate in accidents by analyses of reasons that lead workers to act in that manner.

Estudo Comparativo da Taxa de Injeção em Injetor do Tipo Venturi com e Sem Válvula de Retenção

Para se realizar a técnica da quimigação é necessário que o sistema de irrigação possua um injetor para incorporar os produtos na água de irrigação. Dentre os métodos existentes, o que tem se destacado nos últimos anos é o injetor do tipo Venturi. Essa preferência tem sido motivada pela sua simplicidade, por não possuir peças móveis e ser de baixo custo. Apesar dessas vantagens, o uso do injetor Venturi, assim como os demais injetores, necessita de dispositivos de segurança que minimizem o risco de contaminação ambiental. Neste trabalho, objetivou-se analisar a influência da válvula de retenção na taxa de injeção de água de um injetor do tipo Venturi instalado em pivô central e seu rendimento. O dispositivo de injeção era constituído de um injetor Venturi de 1,5 polegadas associado a uma motobomba centrífuga de 2,2 kW. O equipamento foi instalado na base do pivô central. Foram tomados tempos de esvaziamento de um reservatório de volume de 20 litros. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado, sendo realizadas dez repetições em cada situação avaliada, ou seja, injetor equipado com válvula de retenção e sem a presença da mesma. Aplicou-se a análise de variância, seguida do teste de Tukey. Concluiu-se que a presença de válvula de retenção em injetores do tipo Venturi não influenciou de forma significativa as taxas de injeção e o rendimento, tendo este último apresentado valores da ordem de 10%.

Comparison between common traffic lights and three types of traffic lights with visual cycle a safety and capacity analysis

The objective of this paper is compare the common traffic lights (CTL) to three different types of traffic lights with countdown displays (SCD) and assess their effects on road safety and capacity. This comparison is required because the results found in the literature are divergent among countries and cities, and one of the SCD analyzed in our study is different from the SCD used worldwide. An observational before-after study was conducted to evaluate the safety and capacity in a period of one year before and one year after the implementation of the SCD in three Brazilian cities. The results indicate that the SCD models 1 and 3 had around 35%±14% reduction in the total number of accidents; the model 2, does not have significant reduction. In order to perform the capacity analysis a framework for data collection and an adaptation for estimation of initial lost time in each phase were developed. Considering the capacity analysis there was a reduction around 11% in the lost time in SCD model 1, 7% in SCD model 2 and 3% in SCD model 3. However the implications of this on capacity are trifle due to a small increase in the average headways for all SCD models compare to CTL.