1 resultado para Library Steps Renovation
em Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho"
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (8)
- Repository Napier (2)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (24)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (9)
- Aquatic Commons (13)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (41)
- CaltechTHESIS (37)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (6)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (14)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (7)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (22)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (8)
- Harvard University (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (275)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (20)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (81)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (143)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (14)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (84)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (30)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (40)
- University of Washington (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This study explores, in 3 steps, how the 3 main library classification systems, the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Universal Decimal Classification, cover human knowledge. First, we mapped the knowledge covered by the 3 systems. We used the 10 Pillars of Knowledge: Map of Human Knowledge, which comprises 10 pillars, as an evaluative model. We mapped all the subject-based classes and subclasses that are part of the first 2 levels of the 3 hierarchical structures. Then, we zoomed into each of the 10 pillars and analyzed how the three systems cover the 10 knowledge domains. Finally, we focused on the 3 library systems. Based on the way each one of them covers the 10 knowledge domains, it is evident that they failed to adequately and systematically present contemporary human knowledge. They are unsystematic and biased, and, at the top 2 levels of the hierarchical structures, they are incomplete.