A influência da matemática nas regras para a direção do espírito e em o discurso do método

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Arquimedes, Pappus, Descartes e Polya - Quatro episódios da história da heurística. -

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

O legado de Descartes

The criticism of Cartesian philosophy is correlated on four pillars: the fragmentation of knowledge, the separation between mind and body, the impossibility of the reductionist method for explanation of natural phenomena, and in the superiority of the reason as the only valid form of knowledge. These last two pillars, as many environmentalists claim, contributed decisively to the devaluation of the res extensa over the res cogitans. To check this we used as a theoretical framework the following texts: Discourse on Method, Rules for Conduct of the Spirit and Metaphysical Meditations. By reading these works it was found that the first two pillars (the fragmentation of knowledge and the separation between mind and body) there are no theoretical basis in texts. The failure of the reductionist method to explain the ecological and atomic phenomena and the overcoming of reason as the only valid form of knowledge are supported in their philosophy.