Do professor informante ao professor parceiro: Reflexões sobre o papel da universidade para o desenvolvimento profissional de professores e as mudanças na escola

Este trabalho advoga a idéia de que os relacionamentos colaborativos entre universidade e escolas de 1º e 2º graus representam alternativa metodológica privilegiada tanto para investigação, quanto para atuação sobre o desenvolvimento profissional de professores e suas condições de trabalho. Projetos de natureza coletiva, que aproximam a pesquisa da realidade a ser estudada, como a pesquisa-ação colaborativa, constituem exemplos muito positivos de parceria entre universidade e escolas de 1º e 2º graus, porque geram oportunidades de exercício de práticas inovadoras no interior das escolas e o desenvolvimento de profissionais reflexivos em educação.Por se voltarem para a renovação simultânea de ambas as instituições envolvidas (universidade e escolas), de seus profissionais e de suas práticas, projetos colaborativos permitem, especialmente, que aprendamos mais sobre formas alternativas de iniciar e consolidar mudanças educacionais.

Manifestações da governança territorial no Brasil: uma análise do 'circuito das águas paulista' e do 'circuito das malhas do sul de Minas Gerais'

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Formação de professores: as diretrizes nacionais e o poder local

Coming as a result from a comprehensive research based on Lima’s studies (2008), this article is intended for investigating the process of reorganization of the Pedagogy course offered by a state public university since 2006, when the new National Curricular Guides were instituted. The subject matter brings up as one of its purposes to identify the main difficulties and the possible answers given in order to cause the changes to happen, taking in consideration both the external and internal interests of the institution. To further these aims, actual instruments were applied to the research: documents related to the Pedagogy course that were kept in the Council of the university and interviews with the members who took part in the process of readjustment. Because it is a public university, at first there was a mistaken presumption of the primacy of an administration founded upon democratic principles, in which the divergent opinions do not turn out to be taken as mere pretexts, but as an opportunity of dialogue and to establish collective projects. However, the results of the analysis shook that basic assumption and proved the opposite: the process was led to a rational/bureaucratic pattern of administration, the goals of which intended to adjust the institution to the external precepts and to establish the consensus — understood here as an absolute lack of conflicts. Nevertheless, it was chosen to conciliate the Pedagogy course to the national guides, without causing any harm to the departmental interests. These are reasons that justify satisfactorily the fact of this article being supposed to raise and quicken new and revitalized debate whenever there is an engagement of those who are most concerned for the duty of student teachers’ instruction, but mainly that of being expected to participate in the effective discussion/decision — making process of creating ends which to strive and work for.