14-3-3: Defense and regulatory proteins coding by Eucalyptus genome

The data mining of Eucalyptus ESTs genome finds four clusters (EGCEST2257E11.g, EGBGRT3213F11.g, and EGCCFB1223H11.g) from highly conservative 14-3-3 protein family which modulates a wide variety of cellular processes. Multiple alignments were built from twenty four sequences of 14-3-3 proteins searched into the GenBank databases and into the four pools of Eucalyptus genome programs. The alignment has shown two regions highly conservative on the sequences corresponding to the motifs of protein phosphorylation and nine highly conservative regions on the sequence corresponding to the linkage regions of alpha helices structure based on three dimensional of dimer functional structure. The differences of amino acid into the structural and functional domains of 14-3-3 plant protein were identified and can explain the functional diversity of different isoforms. The phylogenic protein trees were built by the maximum parsimony and neighborjoining procedures of Clustal X alignments and PAUP software for phylogenic analysis.

Interspecific variation in the defensive responses of obligate plant-ants: experimental tests and consequences for herbivory

The aggressive behavior of ants that protect plants from herbivores in exchange for rewards such as shelter or food is thought to be an important form of biotic defense against herbivory, particularly in tropical systems. To date, however, no one has compared the defensive responses of different ant taxa associated with the same plant species, and attempted to relate these differences to longer-term efficacy of ant defense. We used experimental cues associated with herbivory-physical damage and extracts of chemical volatiles from leaf tissue-to compare the aggressive responses of two ant species obligately associated with the Amazonian myrmecophyte Tococa bullifera (Melastomataceae). We also conducted a colony removal experiment to quantify the level of resistance from herbivores provided to plants by each ant species. Our experiments demonstrate that some cues eliciting a strong response from one ant species elicited no response by the other. For cues that do elicit responses, the magnitude of these responses can vary interspecifically. These patterns were consistent with the level of resistance provided from herbivores to plants. The colony removal experiment showed that both ant species defend plants from herbivores: however, herbivory was higher on plants colonized by the less aggressive ant species. Our results add to the growing body of literature indicating defensive ant responses are stimulated by cues associated with herbivory. However, they also suggest the local and regional variation in the composition of potential partner taxa could influence the ecology and evolution of defensive mutualisms in ways that have previously remained unexplored.

Does attraction to frugivores or defense against pathogens shape fruit pulp composition?

Fruit traits evolve in response to an evolutionary triad between plants, seed dispersers, and antagonists that consume fruits but do not disperse seeds. The defense trade-off hypothesis predicts that the composition of nutrients and of secondary compounds in fruit pulp is shaped by a trade-off between defense against antagonists and attraction to seed dispersers. The removal rate model of this hypothesis predicts a negative relationship between nutrients and secondary compounds, whereas the toxin-titration model predicts a positive relationship. To test these alternative models, we evaluated whether the contents of nutrients and secondary compounds can be used to predict fruit removal by mutualists and pathogens in 14 bird-dispersed plants on a subtropical island in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil. We selected eight to ten individuals of each species and prevented fruit removal by covering four branches with a net and left fruits on four other branches available to both, vertebrate fruit consumers and pathogens. The persistence of ripe fruits was drastically different among species for bagged and open fruits, and all fruit species persisted longer when protected against seed dispersers. We found that those fruits that are quickly removed by vertebrates are nutrient-rich, but although the attack rate of pathogens is also high, these fruits have low contents of quantitative defenses such as tannins and phenols. Thus, we suggest that the fruit removal rate by seed dispersers is the primary factor selecting the levels of fruit defense. Likewise, nutrient-poor fruits have low removal of seed dispersers and low probability of attack by pathogens. These species retain ripe fruits in an intact condition for a prolonged period because they are highly defended by secondary compounds, which reduce overall attractiveness. However, this strategy might be advantageous for plants that depend on rare or unreliable dispersers.

Selenium and sulfur: mitigation in plant stresses

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)