4 resultados para CARDIOLOGIA - INVESTIGACIONES
em Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte(UFRN)
Resumo:
In order to qualify Primary Health Care in Brazil, the Ministry of Health implemented the Brazilian Telehealth Program to provide health support (telecare) and permanent health education (tele-education). In this respect, one of the primary services offered is teleconsultation. As part of the national expansion of the program, a local Telehealth Center, called Telehealth/RN, was created in Rio Grande do Norte state. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of cardiological teleconsultations at Telehealth/RN, and analyze the characteristics of the teleconsultations in cardiology requested. Formative Second Opinions in cardiology, available at the web site of the Brazilian Telehealth Program, were also examined. This is a quantitative study with a descriptive, observational design. A total of 56 Formative Second Opinions in cardiology were identified, a majority related to hypertension (29%), focused on treatment support (30%), and requested by doctors (59%). At Telehealth/RN, 47 teleconsultations in cardiology were carried out, a majority also related to hypertension (50%), requested by community health workers (45%) and focused directly on treatment (52%). Cardiological teleconsultation, implemented at the Telehealth/RN in April 2014, is a practical and efficient strategy capable of ensuring health services and reaching those who live in remote areas. Knowing the demand for teleconsultations is extremely important, given that they provide the information needed to correct existing inadequacies related to care, management and/or education, as well as providing the basis for public policies that meet the demands of teleconsultation.
Resumo:
The interprofessional education still represents a great challenge for the health education. This paper aims at implementing the Interprofessional Cardiology Visit (VIC, acronym in Portuguese) as a teaching strategy for the interprofessional education in the undergraduate and graduate courses of UFRN (Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, acronym in Portuguese). It is a prospective and exploratory study held from March 2013 to November 2014, in the cardiology department of HUOL (Portuguese acronym for Onofre Lopes University Hospital), including health professionals from the mentioned hospital (doctor, psycologist, physiotherapist, dentist, social assistant, nutritionist, pharmacist and nurse), undergraduate and graduate students from the health courses of UFRN. The study happened in three parts: interprofessional activity planning; Implementation of the activity “Interprofessional Cardiology Visit (VIC)”; and Activity evaluation, this last one was made through focus groups. The process of planning and implementation of the VIC was described during the implementation phase: 60 meetings in which 1324 participants discussed one specific patient per meeting. After each case presentation, an interprofessional discussion was held, pointing out each professional’s specific point of view towards improving the overall care of that discussed patient. From the focus group analysis, five categories emerged: Recognition of previous participations in interprofessional activities; Conceptual vision of interprofessional activities; Impacts of the VIC to the patient’s care; Contributions of VIC to the professional training; and Challenges of VIC continuation. The making and planning of VIC process has reached its goals, despite of some health professional’s participation not being systematic due to work overload, such as the nurses’ case, as well as schedule difficulties. The VIC was praised as a successful experience and considered an initiative with positive impact for improving the care of patients with heart diseases. It is clear, from analyzing the discourses, that the VIC is a strategy which positively impacts both the care and the teaching. However, some difficulties remain, such as the lack of human resources and the challenge of making it systematic.
Resumo:
The present study had as goal to evaluate Rio Grande do Norte state’s medical residency programs (MRP) in Cardiology. It’s a descriptive study, including a documental analysis of the program’s accreditation processes (PAP) of cardiology’s medical residency in Rio Grande do Norte state in 2014 and the analysis of the resident’s perception about his professional education as a specialist in Cardiology. Beside the documental analysis of the PAPs, it was applied a semi-structured questionnaire with closed questions Likert style and open questions to all the current and former residents of the MRPs analyzed. Two MRPs in Cardiology were identified in Rio Grande do Norte state, one hosted in a public institution and the other in a private institution. The documental analysis showed a greater amount of preceptors with a good level of ownership on the public institution in comparison with the private one, as well as a bigger number of publications, participation in congresses and in book’s publications. The private institution presents a better Urgency’s infrastructure, with emergency room and cardiologic ICU. It IS clear that the residents are aware of how a good residency must work, as well as the strengths and fragilities of their own residences. Most of Onofre Lopes Universitary Hospital’s residents point out as a strength the organization, participation and quality of the preceptors, practice activities and scientific debates, great amount of patients and the visits and debates with the preceptors on the sickrooms. As the greatest fragilities, they emphasize the lack of a urgency service of their own and a specialized ICU. In Coração Hospital of Natal (HCor), it is listed as weak points the theoretic scheduling and the few ambulatory practices. As positive aspects, they report the preceptors, the agility on the execution of exams, a good number of serious patients and procedures. In both residences, it is seen a certain difficulty in accepting the important and mandatory items imposed by the rules of the Medical Residences’ National Committee, such as: biostatistics, bioethics, medical ethic, epidemiology and research methodology. Besides that, the residents recognize that both hospitals have a good infrastructure and technological support, especially in imaging methods. The evaluation of PRMCs identifies the strengths of each program and the aspects to be improved in both programs. It also allowed the observation of difficulties in accepting some regulations contained in the CNRM resolution by the resident, such as participation in activities such as biostatistics, epidemiology and research methodology as well as the improvement needs of specific technical training, such as in emergency care. Thus, our results make possible to develop strategies for continued improvement of PRMC in RN state. In addition, it enabled the preparation of the resident’s manual in cardiology, containing even a breakdown of resident evaluation system, which could serve as a model for other residency programs.
Resumo:
A residência médica é uma modalidade de ensino de pós-graduação destinada a médicos, funciona em instituições de saúde, sob a orientação de profissionais médicos de elevada qualificação ética e profissional, sendo considerada o “padrão ouro” para a formação do especialista. A utilização do método de avaliação 360 graus na residência médica visa a avaliação integral dos médicos residentes, preenchendo lacunas que a avaliação cognitiva isolada deixa, quando utilizada como método único. Essa avaliação proporciona uma avaliação mais global do médico residente, já que inclui sua autoavaliação, avaliação pelos pares, pacientes e equipe de saúde. O objetivo deste estudo foi definir instrumentos de avaliação para implementar a avaliação 360 graus no programa de residência médica em cardiologia da UFRN e capacitar os docentes e preceptores do citado programa para avaliação de desempenho clínico do residente. Trata-se de estudo exploratório, prospectivo e descritivo, envolvendo quatro médicos residentes do programa de residência médica de cardiologia e 20 de clínica médica, esses durante o rodízio de cardiologia do programa de residência médica (PRM) em Cardiologia do Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes (HUOL), além de 13 preceptores/docentes do PRM em Cardiologia do HUOL. Para implementação do novo modelo avaliativo na residência médica foram programadas três etapas, sendo a primeira a elaboração dos instrumentos de avaliação para a avaliação 360 grus; a segunda, o planejamento e a capacitação dos preceptores do PRM em Cardiologia do HUOL; e a terceira, o início das avaliações 360 graus dos residentes do PRM em Cardiologia e Clínica Médica, durante o período de janeiro de 2014 a março de 2015. Foram avaliados, no total, 24 residentes até o momento, sendo quatro residentes da cardiologia (três residentes do primeiro ano e um residente do segundo ano) e vinte residentes da clínica médica (sendo doze residentes do primeiro ano e oito residentes do segundo ano). Foram realizadas autoavaliações por oito residentes, sendo essas consideradas difíceis pela maioria dos residentes. A avaliação por pares foi realizada por 6 residentes, sendo o desempenho dos pares considerado acima do esperado em todos os itens da avaliação. A avaliação pela equipe de preceptores e equipe multiprofissional com feedback ao final das avaliações mostrou que os residentes de clínica médica do primeiro ano apresentam desempenho acima do esperado em relação ao humanismo, ética e profissionalismo, enquanto os do segundo ano apresentaram desempenho abaixo do esperado no item referente ao exame físico. Quanto aos demais domínios da avaliação todos estiveram dentro do esperado. Dez pacientes avaliaram os oito residentes, sendo tais avaliações positivas no sentido da qualidade da assistência prestada e das informações fornecidas pelos residentes. O método de avaliação 360 graus foi implementado na residência de cardiologia do Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes da UFRN, tendo sido realizada em quatro residentes. A maioria dos preceptores e equipe multiprofissional da residência estão capacitados para utilização do método de avaliação.