O papel de governança corporativa em companhias recentemente privatizadas: evidências brasileiras

Examinamos as diferenças de preço entre diferentes classes de ações em companhias abertas no Brasil com particular ênfase a empresas privatizadas, e discutimos o papel do controlador, liquidez, e problemas de governanças que influenciam esta diferença ao longo do tempo. Nos incluímos uma breve discussão sobre o sistema societário brasileiro, e seus efeitos sobre os acionistas, e as características do processo de privatização, antes de passar a análise econométrica. Encontramos evidência empírica que suporta a hipótese de que a razão ação sem direito a voto sobre a participação acionária total, liquidez, e tipo de controle majoritário, e mudanças na regulamentação são significativas na determinação das diferenças de preço entre ações.

Determinants of differential pricing of equity classes in the Brazilian equity market

We examine the differential pricing of equity classes between voting and non-voting shares in Brazilian listed companies with particular emphasis on privatized companies, and we discuss the role of majority control, liquidity, and governance issues that may influence these differentials over time. We include a brief discussion on the Brazilian corporate law system, its impact on controlling and minority shareholders, and the characteristics of the Brazilian privatization process, before proceeding to the econometric analysis. We find empirical evidence to support that liquidity is a major component for determining this differential pricing over time. Other variables, such as the ratio of non-voting equity to total equity, type of majority control, and changes in regulation signal the high level of agency costs between majority controllers and minority shareholders in explaining the differential pricing of equity classes.

What kind of judiciary do we want?: the access to justice in Brazil

The goal of this paper is to discuss a key issue in the Democratic Rule of Law State: what are the role and main functions of the Judiciary in Brazil? Is the Judiciary mainly a public service provider, adjudicating disputes and guaranteeing individual rights? Or also as a state power, it should mainly control and guide the moral values of the society, changing the status quo and reducing social conflicts? In this sense, what are the conflicts that must be examined by the Judiciary? We will seek to answer these questions based on a discussion subsidized by courts official statistics and the results of surveys conducted with the Brazilian general population. The surveys measured how do citizens feel about their judicial system and what are the circumstances and the facts that determine the judicialization of conflicts. We work with the perceptions and attitudes of citizens relating to the Judiciary as it is today and discuss the Judiciary they want. Then, we compare how attitudes and perceptions relate to actual behavior and use of courts.