Responsabilidade social sob a ótica do assédio moral: o caso furnas

The objectives of this research were to identify and to determine the mam elements presents in actions developed by the company classified as corporate social responsibility as well as the company's speech and relation with their employees1 in Fumas' productive units. In the base theoretician-empiricist, were analyzed the aspects concerning to the social management considering the postindustrial societal model, as to the social responsibility and the moral siege aspect present in the internaI company' s relations. The method that characterizes this research is the case study of a mixing economy company considered as prominence in the industrial scene of the country, from the verification of its organizational climate. The data had been gotten by direct comment and by semistructuralized interviews, carried through with workers belonging to diverse hierarchic organization's studied leveIs, involved with social practices and their organization, having relationship to the employees. The analysis was description-qualitative formo The collected data disclose to the existence of accords and dissonances between the social responsibility practical, the moral siege and the speech presented by this company. The main objective of the study was to extend the agreement concerning to the social responsibility, as well as the moral siege practiced by the company, having as reference their integrant's perceptions, considering both the current economic and social rationalities that establish a new mo dei of relationship between State, companies under its protection and the civil society.

Comparison and analysis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports of the top five companies ranked on the 2013 CSR RepTrak

In the 1970s, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was discussed by Nobel laureate Milton Friedman in his article “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” (Friedman, 1970). His view on CSR was contemptuous as he referred to it as “hypocritical window-dressing” a reflection of the view of Corporate America on CSR back then. For a long time short-term maximization of shareholder value was the only maxim for top management across industries and companies. Over the last decade, CSR has become a more important and relevant factor of a company’s reputation, shifting the discussion from whether CSR is necessary to how best CSR commitments should be done (Smith, 2003). Inevitably, companies do have an environmental, social and economic impact, thereby imposing social costs on current and future generations. In 2013, 50 of the world biggest companies have been responsible for 73 percent of the total carbon dioxide (CO2) emission (Global 500 Climate Change Report 2013). Post et al. (2002) refer to these social costs as a company’s need to retain its “license to operate”. In the late 1990s, CSR reporting was nearly unknown, which drastically changed during the last decade. Allen White, co-founder of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), said that CSR reporting”… has evolved from the extraordinary to the exceptional to the expected” (Confino, 2013). In confirmation of this, virtually all of the world’s largest 250 companies report on CSR (93%) and reporting by now appears to be business standard (KPMG, 2013). CSR reports are a medium for transparency which may lead to an improved company reputation (Noked, 2013; Thorne et al, 2008; Wilburn and Wilburn, 2013). In addition, it may be used as part of an ongoing shareholder relations campaign, which may prevent shareholders from submitting Environmental and Social (E&S)1 proposals (Noked, 2013), based on an Ernst & Young report 1 The top five E&S proposal topic areas in 2013 were: 1. Political spending/ lobbying; 2. Environmental sustainability; 3. Corporate diversity/ EEO; 4.Labor/ human rights and 5. Animal testing/ animal welfare. Three groups of environmental sustainability proposal topics of sub-category number two (environmental sustainability) 6 2013, representing the largest category of shareholder proposals submitted. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) even goes as far as to claim that CSR reports are “…becoming critical to a company’s credibility, transparency and endurance.” (PwC, 2013).