Equity and Efficiency in Education: motivations and targets

The recently released "Educational PAC" attempts to place basic education at the center of the social debate. We have subsidized this debate, offering a diagnosis of how different education levels can impact individuals' lives through broad and easily interpreted indicators. Initially, we analyze how much each educational level reaches the poorest population. For example, how are those in the bottom strata of income distribution benefited by childcare centers, private secondary education, public university or adult education. The next step is to quantify the return of educational actions, such as their effects on employability and an individual's wages, and even health as perceived by the individual, be that individual poor, middle class or elite. The next part of the research presents evidence of how the main characters in education, aka mothers, fathers and children, regard education. The site available with the research presents a broad, user-friendly database, which will allow interested parties to answer their own questions relative to why people do not attend school, the time spent in the educational system and returns to education, which can all be cross-sectioned with a wide array of socio-demographic attributes (gender, income, etc.) and school characteristics (is it public, are school meals offered, etc.) to find answers to: why do young adults of a certain age not attend school? Why do they miss classes? How long is the school day? Aside from the whys and hows of teaching, the research calculates the amount of time spent in school, resulting from a combination between absence rates, evasion raters and length of the school day. The study presents ranks of indicators referring to objective and subjective aspects of education, such as the discussion of the advantages and care in establishing performance based incentives that aim at guiding the states in the race for better educational indicators.

Avaliação dos aspectos subjetivos nos projetos de arquitetura dos alunos de planejamento

Com a intenção de melhor serem conhecidas as formas de avaliação daquilo que chamamos "aspectos subjetivos", nos projetos de arquitetura, selecionamos e entrevistamos 7 arquitetos, escolhidos por suas atuações, tanto profissionais como no magistério. Apresentamos, inicialmente, algumas das mais importantes posições teóricas sobre avaliação, procurando-se, também, mostrar o enfoque sociológico do assunto. Desde logo observamos pontos de vista diversos, divergentes e até discrepantes, entre os vários autores selecionados, o que nos alertou para um possivel ingresso em terreno polêmico. Como metodologia de trabalho, procuramos entrevistar os professores, usando-se as mesmas condições para todos eles (ambiente calmo, descontraído, sem pressa e sem interrupções), ocasião em que um elenco de perguntas era proposto. As respostas foram registradas em um gravador, que ficava à vista, sobre a mesa. Garantimos aos entrevistados que não haveria identificação da autoria das declarações, propiciando-se, assim, mais "fluência" nas respostas e, talvez, um pouco mais de "ousadia" nas afirmações. Em seguida, e já a partir das diversas declarações, buscamos destacar a visão de avaliação de cada um, para em seguida, afunilar essa análise, focalizando, mais especificamente, os aspectos objetivos e os subjetivos na avaliação dos projetos de arquitetura. Concluimos que, apesar das muitas maneiras de avaliar, e de até não avaliar os trabalhos de projeto, há várias atitudes, sistemas, métodos, etc - alguns até conflitantes - empregados pelos diversos professores, que formam, entretanto, uma base comum, uma postura semelhante, entre eles. Essa identidade provém da constatação de que houve unanimidade, entre os entrevistados, de ser a arte uma resultante da composição de ingredientes culturais e ideológicos, provenientes, principalmente, das condições materiais, num determinado momento histórico. Na Arquitetura, com maior ênfase ainda, por ser uma arte utilitária, o seu "engajamento ideológico" torna-se inevitável e, consequentemente a sua avaliação, de forma jacente ou subjacente, será feita por essa ótica.

Crime and punishment with habit formation

Moral concepts affect crime supply. This idea is modelled assuming that illegal activities is habit forming. We introduce habits in a intertemporal general equilibrium framework to illegal activities and compare its outcomes with a model without habit formation. The findings are that habit and crime presents a non linear relationship that hinges upon the level of capital and habit formation. It is possible to show that while the effect of habit on crime is negative for low levels o habit formation it becomes positive as habits goes up. Secondly habit reduces the marginal effect of illegal activities return on crime. Finally, the effect of habit on crime depends positively on the amount of capital. This could explain the relationship between size of cities and illegal activity.

Mhealth entrepreneurship: an exploratory research for a managerial model for mhealth start ups in low and middle income countries

Since some years, mobile technologies in healthcare (mHealth) stand for the transformational force to improve health issues in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although several studies have identified the prevailing issue of inconsistent evidence and new evaluation frameworks have been proposed, few have explored the role of entrepreneurship to create disruptive change in a traditionally conservative sector. I argue that improving the effectiveness of mHealth entrepreneurs might increase the adoption of mHealth solutions. Thus, this study aims at proposing a managerial model for the analysis of mHealth solutions from the entrepreneurial perspective in the context of LMICs. I identified the Khoja–Durrani–Scott (KDS) framework as theoretical basis for the managerial model, due to its explicit focus on the context of LMICs. In the subsequent exploratory research I, first, used semi-structured interviews with five specialists in mHealth, local healthcare systems and investment to identify necessary adaptations to the model. The findings of the interviews proposed that especially the economic theme had to be clarified and an additional entrepreneurial theme was necessary. Additionally, an evaluation questionnaire was proposed. In the second phase, I applied the questionnaire to five start-ups, operating in Brazil and Tanzania, and conducted semi-structured interviews with the entrepreneurs to gain practical insights for the theoretical development. Three of five entrepreneurs perceived that the results correlated with the entrepreneurs' expectations of the strengths and weaknesses of the start-ups. Main shortcomings of the model related to the ambiguity of some questions. In addition to the findings for the model, the results of the scores were analyzed. The analysis suggested that across the participating mHealth start-ups the ‘behavioral and socio-technical’ outcomes were the strongest and the ‘policy’ outcomes were the weakest themes. The managerial model integrates several perspectives, structured around the entrepreneur. In order to validate the model, future research may link the development of a start-up with the evolution of the scores in longitudinal case studies or large-scale tests.