How children's television networks in the United States have adapted to the changing digital habits of their young audiences: A comparative analysis between the Disney Channel and Nickelodeon

In the contemporary societies, many children are drawn to digital media, using it in ways that were initially unfathomable. Changing digital habits among young children have been affiliated to the rapid development, witnessed in the technological field. Prevalently, new forms of technology are being developed and ingrained into young children’s day-to-day activities. The emergence of new forms of technology has in turn prompted significant changes in digital and media consumption particularly, among young children. Changes in media and digital consumption have in turn instigated linear transition in the analogue media industries. This has resulted in analogue media networks working towards digitalizing their industries in a manner that will befit changing digital habits among young children. This report aims at establishing and analyzing the different ways in which children’s digital habits have changed and revolutionized. To achieve this, the report will critically examine the existing scope of knowledge, with reference to changing digital habits among young audiences. Further, the report also aims at establishing the manner in which children television networks have adapted to the changing digital habits among young audiences. To achieve this, the report will focus on two children television networks, Disney channel, and Nickelodeon. After which, a comparative analysis will be conducted to establish the changes made by each of these television channels, with the aim of adapting to the new digital habits among children.

Which strategies can an educational business, such as a kindergarten in Germany, develop to foster employee engagement?

Which strategies can an educational business, such as a Kindergarten in Germany, develop to foster employee engagement? The goal of this master thesis is to identify effective and viable measures to engage employees, that could be potentially implemented in a Kindergarten in Germany. The literature concerning the notion of employee engagement is so inconsistent that even studies about the subject fail to find one common definition and have to acknowledge the variety of existing definitions (IES, 2014, p.52-53). This reflects the youth of the concept, which has only been partially studied by academics and practitioners in recent years. The literature gap about employee engagement concerns many aspects, among which small companies and educational businesses, in particular those focusing on early child development. Considering the low levels of employee engagement in Germany combined with the absence of studies on educational organizations focusing in early child development this master thesis studies engagement in German Kindergärten(s). This master thesis is divided in two parts consisting of a literature review and a case study. The literature review allows to follow the evolution of the concept along the years, while the case study focuses on assessing employee engagement in Montessori Kindergärten(s) in Munich & elaborating potential measures to increase engagement levels. Double sided research was undertaken for this case study. On the one hand a quantitative research was performed, through a survey, in order to uncover which strategies would be viable to foster employee engagement. On the other hand a qualitative research was undertaken, consisting in an internship in a Kindergarten, in order to shed light on how to do so. Findings in the quantitative research indicate overall engagement levels average to low. Results related to specific statements bring out the originality of the educational sector, which is in some aspects intrinsically engaging, similarly to the medical field (Seijts & Crim, 2006). Furthermore low engagement levels led to a conversely high number of positives responses to potential engagement strategies suggesting their potential effectiveness. Findings in the qualitative research are coherent with qualitative results and complement them

Arbitragem regulatória X one size fits all: a discricionariedade na regulação bancária internacional entre Cila e Caríbdis

As peculiaridades da atividade bancária - normalmente vista como fundamental à persecução do desenvolvimento, bem como bastante influenciada pelo direito - estimularam a emergência de um regime internacional de regulação da categoria. Tal advento se deu na esteira dos trabalhos realizados por organizações internacionais, como o Comitê da Basileia (BCBS) e o Comitê de Estabilidade Financeira (FSB), e em virtude da percepção de estarmos em um mundo no qual os mercados estão muito interligados, mas permanecem nacionalmente regulados. À parte da discussão do mérito e efetividade dos padrões regulatórios propostos por essas organizações, em um contexto no qual uma série de países busca implementá-los, interessa ao presente trabalho perscrutar os elementos que definem o grau adequado de discricionariedade de implementação conferida na formulação desses. A análise de tal problema sugere a existência de dois extremos a se evitar: a arbitragem regulatória e o one size fits all. Evitar a arbitragem regulatória é uma preocupação da literatura de regulação bancária que se traduz em conter uma variação muito acentuada entre os regimes regulatórios de diferentes jurisdições. Isso enseja três vetores favoráveis a um menor grau de discricionariedade, representado por desígnios de maior coordenação, maior competitividade e de evitar uma race to the bottom regulatória entre os países. Já evitar o one size fits all é uma preocupação recorrente da literatura de direito e desenvolvimento que sugere a necessidade de se atentar para as peculiaridades locais na formulação de políticas regulatórias. Por sua vez, isso enseja outros três vetores, dessa vez em direção a um maior grau de discricionariedade. Sendo esses representados por preocupações com a eficiência das medidas adotadas, com a garantia de um espaço de manobra que respeite a autodeterminação dos países - ao menos minorando eventuais déficits democráticos da estipulação de padrões internacionais - e com a viabilidade prática do experimentalismo. A fim de analisar esse problema e levando em conta esses extremos, propõe-se uma estratégia bipartida: a construção de um enquadramento teórico e a verificação de uma hipótese de pesquisa, segundo a qual um caso específico de regulação bancária pode demonstrar como esses elementos interagem na definição do grau de discricionariedade. Assim, em um primeiro momento - após a necessária contextualização e descrição metodológica - é construído um framework teórico do problema à luz da literatura da regulação bancária e do instrumental utilizado pelas discussões acerca do impacto do direito no desenvolvimento. Discussões essas que há anos têm abordado a formulação de padrões internacionais e a sua implementação em contextos nacionais diversos. Também nesse primeiro momento e como parte da construção dos alicerces teóricos, procede-se a um excurso que busca verificar a hipótese da confiança no sistema bancário ser uma espécie de baldio (common), bem como suas possíveis consequências. Partindo desse enquadramento, elege-se o segmento de regulação bancária relativo aos garantidores de depósito para uma análise de caso. Tal análise - realizada com subsídios provenientes de pesquisa bibliográfica e empírica - busca demonstrar com que grau de discricionariedade e de que forma se deu a formulação e implementação de padrões internacionais nesse segmento. Ao fim, analisa-se como os vetores determinantes do grau de discricionariedade interagem no caso dos garantidores de depósitos, bem como as sugestões possivelmente inferíveis dessa verificação para os demais segmentos da regulação bancária.

SSM samba: a survey of brazilian approaches to soft systems methodology (1999-2005)

This paper reports the results of a survey intended to discover the manner in which Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) is understood and used in Brazil. The focus is upon SSM papers published in national and international journals, and conferences, incorporating a refereeing procedure. To be included in the survey, publications had to meet at least one of the following criteria: (a) authorship is clearly of Brazilian nationality; or, (b) authorship is affiliated to a Brazilian institution; or (c) application is set in Brazil. Similar surveys reporting on the United Kingdom, Australia and, to a lesser extent, Spain have been published previously in the literature. This paper, therefore, contributes to the growing international understanding and usage of SSM. Ultimately the paper serves as an initial map of the developing context in Brazilian SSM theory and practice.

The revenge of the market on the rentiers why neo-liberal reports of the end of history turned out to be premature

Starting from the perspective of heterodox Keynesian-Minskyian-Kindlebergian financial economics, this paper begins by highlighting a number of mechanisms that contributed to the current financial crisis. These include excess liquidity, income polarisation, conflicts between financial and productive capital, lack of intelligent regulation, asymmetric information, principal-agent dilemmas and bounded rationalities. However, the paper then proceeds to argue that perhaps more than ever the ‘macroeconomics’ that led to this crisis only makes analytical sense if examined within the framework of the political settlements and distributional outcomes in which it had operated. Taking the perspective of critical social theories the paper concludes that, ultimately, the current financial crisis is the outcome of something much more systemic, namely an attempt to use neo-liberalism (or, in US terms, neo-conservatism) as a new technology of power to help transform capitalism into a rentiers’ delight. And in particular, into a system without much ‘compulsion’ on big business; i.e., one that imposes only minimal pressures on big agents to engage in competitive struggles in the real economy (while inflicting exactly the opposite fate on workers and small firms). A key component in the effectiveness of this new technology of power was its ability to transform the state into a major facilitator of the ever-increasing rent-seeking practices of oligopolistic capital. The architects of this experiment include some capitalist groups (in particular rentiers from the financial sector as well as capitalists from the ‘mature’ and most polluting industries of the preceding techno-economic paradigm), some political groups, as well as intellectual networks with their allies – including most economists and the ‘new’ left. Although rentiers did succeed in their attempt to get rid of practically all fetters on their greed, in the end the crisis materialised when ‘markets’ took their inevitable revenge on the rentiers by calling their (blatant) bluff.