Anti-money laundering and governance in Latin America

This paper is designed to provide a first approach to some questions raised by the Global administrative Law Project concerning the anti money laundering system, as a global governance project, and how it works in Latin America. We address some interactions between actors at the global, regional and local level. So we have organized our presentation according to those three spaces: 1) global standards, 2) regional efforts and 3) national experiences, where we present the contrast between Brazil and Argentina.

Financial regulation and international criminal policy: the anti-money laundering system in Brazil and Argentina

The objective of this paper is to present and compare the process and the results of the implementation of the anti-money laundering system in Brazil and Argentina. Considering that the internal transformations cannot be discussed without a clear understanding of the international apparatus, attention will be given to the description of the “international policy” designed and conducted by FATF. Therefore, its incorporation into two different national realities, the Brazilian and the Argentinean ones, will shed light not only on the transnational transformations both States underwent but also on the anti-money laundering regime itself. The paper is divided into five parts. The first one presents a brief introduction on the emergence and development of the relationship between financial regulation and criminal policy. The two following sections are designed to present an overview of the anti money laundering system in Brazil and Argentina and of the role of FATF in their implementation process. The fourth section presents two Brazilian examples of situations in which full advantage of the FATF regime was taken: the National Strategy to Combat Corruption and Money Laundering and the BacenJud, a communication channel between the financial system and the judicial power. To conclude, final comments will be presented in connection with the central questions of the project this paper is part of .

Análise dos fatores de convencimento do juízo brasileiro quanto à ocorrência de fraude contábil: um estudo de caso Múltiplo da Gallus, da Encol e do Banco Santos

This work is based on the analysis of three Brazilian cases of condemnation by accounting fraud and financial reports manipulation of data, where we tried to identify if there is condemnation by accounting fraud in Brazil and the main factors considered by the judge to convince them about the accounting fraud. The theoretical reference quoted involves the theory of fraud, the psychology of fraud, examples of financial fraud in foreign companies and Brazilians banks and the law in Brazil regarding fraud and money laundering. The methodology consisted in studies of Brazilian cases with the data collection criteria from three law suits. The methodology used was the Contents Analysis The samples were chosen according to the impact those cases had in Brazil and the facility to access their law suits. Therefore, we chose Gallus Agropecuária S/A, Encol S/A and Banco Santos S/A for a matter of convenience. The evidence indicated that in those three cases, the court was convinced by the accounting fraud due to omission of relevant financial information in the balance sheet, by information provided to the market that didn¿t reflect the healthy of the company (assets written up without the property). It was identified as well that, in those three cases, there was condemnation not only for the accounting fraud per si, but also by the combination of other crimes as money laundering, fraud gang, material and ideological false fraud, and bankruptcy.

Gestão em redes para a construção de políticas públicas: um estudo sobre as atividades e prevenção e repressão à lavagem de dinheiro no Brasil

O objetivo desta pesquisa foi compreender de que modo a emergência de estilos de gestão pública baseados em rede pode contribuir para a construção de políticas públicas relacionadas à prevenção e repressão à lavagem de dinheiro. O arcabouço teórico fundamentou-se nas teorias de redes interorganizacionais, mais especificamente, nas redes de políticas públicas. Foram estudadas relações de colaboração e cooperação que, por transcenderem os limites organizacionais, garantem maior flexibilidade e abrangência ao processo de construção de políticas públicas. As reflexões sobre estas teorias foram realizadas a partir de um contexto empírico específico: o da articulação entre instituições brasileiras que atuam na prevenção e repressão à lavagem de dinheiro. Este contexto foi escolhido pela percepção de que a prática de ilícitos financeiros traz enormes prejuízos a nações que precisam superar desigualdades econômicas e sociais. A escolha metodológica foi motivada por questões ontológicas e epistemológicas que apontaram a metodologia reflexiva como a mais adequada para o alcance dos objetivos propostos na pesquisa. A partir da construção dos dados empíricos foi possível criar construtos que sintetizam os benefícios e desafios da constituição de redes de políticas públicas. As conexões interpretativas subsequentes reforçam a ideia de que os espíritos democrático, republicano e de cooperação devem nortear os valores compartilhados na rede. Assim, se a atuação interna da rede se aprimora, torna-se possível superar entraves endógenos (foco apenas na boa reputação externa) e exógenos (pressão das elites corruptas) à rede, o que resulta em uma melhor interação entre os participantes, gerando resultados mais efetivos para a sociedade.