Are CGE Models still useful in economic policy making?

This paper develops background considerations to help better framing the results of a CGE exercise. Three main criticisms are usually addressed to CGE efforts. First, they are too aggregate, their conclusions failing to shed light on relevant sectors or issues. Second, they imply huge data requirements. Timeliness is frequently jeopardised by out-dated sources, benchmarks referring to realities gone by. Finally, results are meaningless, as they answer wrong or ill-posed questions. Modelling demands end up by creating a rather artificial context, where the original questions lose content. In spite of a positive outlook on the first two, crucial questions lie in the third point. After elaborating such questions, and trying to answer some, the text argues that CGE models can come closer to reality. If their use is still scarce to give way to a fruitful symbiosis between negotiations and simulation results, they remain the only available technique providing a global, inter-related way of capturing economy-wide effects of several different policies. International organisations can play a major role supporting and encouraging improvements. They are also uniquely positioned to enhance information and data sharing, as well as putting people from various origins together, to share their experiences. A serious and complex homework is however required, to correct, at least, the most dangerous present shortcomings of the technique.

Risk sharing and the household collective model

When the joint assumption of optimal risk sharing and coincidence of beliefs is added to the collective model of Browning and Chiappori (1998) income pooling and symmetry of the pseudo-Hicksian matrix are shown to be restored. Because these are also the features of the unitary model usually rejected in empirical studies one may argue that these assumptions are at odds with evidence. We argue that this needs not be the case. The use of cross-section data to generate price and income variation is based Oil a definition of income pooling or symmetry suitable for testing the unitary model, but not the collective model with risk sharing. AIso, by relaxing assumptions on beliefs, we show that symmetry and income pooling is lost. However, with usual assumptions on existence of assignable goods, we show that beliefs are identifiable. More importantly, if di:fferences in beliefs are not too extreme, the risk sharing hypothesis is still testable.

Rent-sharing in Brazil: using trade liberalization as a natural experiment

This paper examines the extent of rent-sharing in Brazil, between 1988 and 1995, combining two different data sets: annual industrial surveys (pIA) and annual household surveys (PNADs). The aim is to use the trade liberalization policies that took place in Brazil in the early 1990s as a "natural experiment" to examine the impact ofproduct market rents on wages. We first estimate inter-industry wage differentials in Brazil, using the household surveys, afier controlling for various observable workers' characteristics. In a reduced form fixed effects equation, these controlled inter-industry differentials are seen to depend on the industries' rate of effective tariff. We also find that LSDV estimates of the effect of value-added per worker (computed using the industrial surveys) on the wage differentials are positive, but somewhat small. However, we find that instrumenting the valued-added with the effective tariffs more than doubles the estimated rent-sharing coefficient. The paper concludes that rent-sharing is prevalent in the Brazilian manufacturing sector, and this mechanism transferred part of the productivity gains due to trade liberalization to manufacturing workers in the form ofhigher (controlled) wage premium.

Rent-sharing no setor industrial brasileiro: uma análise empírica para o período de 2002 – 2012

Este trabalho visa analisar a existência de rent-sharing no setor industrial brasileiro entre os anos de 2002 e 2012. Este tema já foi amplamente abordado pela literatura internacional, onde é possível identificar evidências que corroboram a existência de rent-sharing nas economias desenvolvidas. Porém, para a economia brasileira este tema ainda foi pouco explorado e não temos conhecimento de estudos empíricos realizados para os anos mais recentes. A fim de examinar empiricamente a relação entre os lucros das firmas e a remuneração de seus trabalhadores, foram estimados dois modelos. Primeiramente, um modelo em cross section, que tem como unidade de observação o trabalhador, utilizando uma base de dados estruturada através do cruzamento da RAIS e da PIA. Também foi analisado se esta correlação ocorre de forma homogênea entre os níveis de qualificação dos trabalhadores. Em seguida, foi realizada a estimativa em painel dinâmico, cujo nível de agregação é o setor industrial, prevendo também a correção para o clássico problema de endogeneidade entre os lucros das firmas e os salários dos trabalhadores por meio de variáveis instrumentais. Os resultados indicam que um aumento no nível de rentabilidade das firmas gera, no longo prazo, uma elevação dos salários pagos naquele setor, porém este efeito é de baixa magnitude.