Diz-me quanto ganhas e te direi como te sentes: análise do overpayment no funcionalismo público no Brasil

O contexto do funcionalismo público como fonte empregadora tem chamado crescente atenção, uma vez que as práticas de remuneração acima da média de mercado adotadas neste contexto vêm atraindo cada vez mais indivíduos altamente qualificados (Bender & Fernandes, 2006). Entretanto, trata-se de um setor que adota práticas de remuneração que também são caracterizadas pela desigualdade, uma vez que carreiras bem remuneradas co-existem com outras mal remuneradas, por vezes, dentro do mesmo espaço organizacional e executando tarefas similares. Estudos demonstram que, a priori, um ambiente de trabalho que favorece uma situação de desigualdade afeta negativamente diversos aspectos comportamentais dos funcionários que nele exercem atividades (e.g. De Cremer & Van Kleef, 2009; Peters & Van den Bos, 2008; Peters, Van den Bos & Bobocel, 2004). Desta forma, o presente estudo buscou entender como uma situação de desigualdade remuneratória – em que alguns membros se encontram em uma situação de overpayment, enquanto que outros na situação de underpayment – pode influenciar fatores como a autoestima e o comprometimento afetivo dos funcionários públicos com relação aos seus trabalhos. Um órgão público do Poder Executivo Federal, foi escolhido como lócus de pesquisa para analisar estes impactos. A metodologia utilizada na pesquisa teve uma natureza quantitativa e qualitativa. Numa primeira etapa, aplicaram-se 105 questionários a dois grupos distintos de servidores desse órgão público (um grupo tido como overpaid e outro tido como underpaid), tendo sido analisadas, por meio de regressões hierárquicas, os impactos da percepção de justiça salarial na auto-estima e no comprometimento dos funcionários. Posteriormente, realizaram-se 20 entrevistas com funcionários dos dois grupos com o intuito de aprofundar e discutir aspectos mais sensíveis relacionados com os resultados. Dessas análises foi possível confirmar a influência direta do senso de justiça remuneratória que o indivíduo possui na sua auto-estima e no seu comprometimento afetivo. Os resultados da pesquisa demonstram que representantes das carreiras bemremuneradas tendem a comparar-se com outras carreiras melhor remuneradas, evitando a comparação com os colegas do trabalho pertencentes a carreiras menos favorecidas. Entretanto, a influência que o sentimento de justiça tem em ambos os resultados comportamentais analisados é potencializada quanto maior for a percepção do indivíduo acerca da satisfação dos seus pares com o trabalho e com a sua remuneração. Observou-se ainda o efeito moderador da motivação epistêmica nesta relação. Esta pesquisa espera ter contribuído para melhor entender os impactos que políticas salariais podem ter nos funcionários públicos.

Performance-based compensation vs. guaranteed compensation: contractual incentives and performance

Top management from retail banks must delegate authority to lower-level managers to operate branches and service centers. Doing so, they must navigate through conflicts of interest, asymmetric information and limited monitoring in designing compensation plans for such agents. Pursuant to this delegation, the banks adopt a system of performance targets and incentives to align the interests of senior management and unit managers. This paper evaluates the causal relationship between performance-based salaries and managers’ effective performance. We use a fixed effects estimator to analyze an unbalanced panel of data from one of the largest Brazilian retail banks during the period from January 2007 to June 2009. The results indicate that agents with guaranteed variable salary contracts demonstrate inferior performance compared with agents who have performance-based compensation packages. We conclude that there is a moral hazard that can be observed in the behavior of agents who are subject to guaranteed variable salary contracts.

Financial distress as a collapse of incentive scheme

This paper explaina why workers lack motivation near bankruptcy, why they tend to leave companies in financiai distreas, and why thoae who remam require higher compensation. Theae indirect costa of financiai diatresa adie becauae the optimal combination of debt and incentive achem.ea, deaigned to minimize agency costa, ends up underpaying managers when there ia a bankruptcy threat. The paper a1so providea new empirica1 implications on the intera.ction between financiai reatructuring and changea in managerial compensation. Theae predictions are supported by the findings of Gilson and Vetsuypens (1992).

Workplace diversity and incentive contracts : theory and evidence

This paper presents a simple theory of the provision of incentives in firms in which the principal optimally chooses both compensation contracts and the composition of the work force. Assuming that individuals display group loyalty, a less diverse (more homogeneous) work force will be more cooperative. Simple comparative statics provide some testable implications relating risk, diversity and incentive pay. I also analyze the case in which workers’ characteristics cannot be readily observed ex ante. The theory then predicts that firms are more likely to prevent workers from interacting with each other when workers are expected to have similar characteristics. This shows a surprising effect of diversity in the workplace: more diverse firms will promote more interactions between workers of different types, i.e. they will be less segregated. I test the main predictions of the model using a cross-sectional sample of corporate boards. I use the proportion of women on boards as a measure of diversity. There are three main empirical findings: (1) a significant negative correlation between firm risk and diversity, (2) a significant positive relationship between performance-based compensation and diversity and (3) a significant positive correlation between the number of board meetings (a measure of interactions among directors) and diversity. The evidence is broadly consistent with the implications of the theory.

From public to private : the performance of former public workers in the Brazilian labor market

This paper analyzes the placement in the private sector of a subset of Brazilian public-sector employees. This group left public employment in the mid-1990’s through a voluntary severance program. This paper contrasts their earnings before and after quitting the public sector, and compares both sets of wages to public and private sector earnings for similar workers. We find that participants in this voluntary severance program suffered a significant reduction in average earnings wage and an increase in earnings dispersion. We test whether the reduction in average earnings and the increase in earnings dispersion is the expected outcome once one controls for observed characteristics, by means of counterfactual simulations. Several methods of controlling for observed characteristics (parametric and non-parametrically) are used for robustness. The results indicate that this group of workers was paid at levels below what would be expected given their embodied observable characteristics.

The influence of lifestyle and gender on sickness absence in brazilian workers

Background: Despite an increasing body of knowledge concerning gender and lifestyle factors as determinants of sickness absence in well-developed countries, the relationship between these variables has not been elucidated in emerging economic power countries, where the burden of non-communicable diseases is particularly high. This study aimed to analyze the relationships among lifestyle-related factors and sick leave and to examine whether gender differences in sickness absence can be explained by differences in socio-demographic, work and lifestyle-related factors among Brazilian workers. Methods: In this longitudinal study with a one year follow-up among 2.150 employees of a Brazilian airline company, sick leave was the primary outcome of interest. Independent variables collected by interview at enrolment in the study were gender, age, educational level, type of work, stress, and lifestyle-related factors (body mass index, physical activity and smoking). In addition, the risk for coronary heart disease was determined based on measurement of blood pressure, total cholesterol and glucose levels. The total number of days on sick leave during 12 months follow-up was available from the company register. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the influence of socio-demographic, type of work and lifestyle-related factors on sick leave. Results: Younger employees, those with lower educational level, those who worked as air crew members and those with higher levels of stress were more likely to have sick leave. Body mass index and level of physical activity were not associated with sick leave. After adjustment by socio-demographic variables, increased odds for 10 or more days of sick leave were found in smokers (OR = 1.51, CI = 1.05-2.17), and ex-smokers (OR = 1.45, CI = 1.01-2.10). Women were more likely to have 10 or more days of sick leave. Gender differences were reduced mainly when adjusted for type of work (15%) and educational level (7%). Conclusions: The higher occurrence of sick leave among women than among men was partly explained by type of work and educational level. Our results suggest that type of work, a stressful life, and smoking are important targets for health promotion in this study population