48 resultados para Wage inequality
em Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV
Resumo:
O objetivo deste trabalho é entender mais sobre o papel da liberalização sobre a desigualdade salarial, mais precisamente, sobre a desigualdade residual dos salários. Usando a abertura comercial brasileira, a extensa redução tarifária que ocorreu entre 1987 e 1995, é investigado empiricamente se os diferentes níveis de exposição ao comércio entre os estados contribuíram para os diferentes movimentos da desigualdade. Os resultados indicam que estados mais expostos à liberalização comercial experimentaram um aumento relativo da desigualdade residual dos salários ou, de forma equivalente, uma menor redução. Estes resultados enriquecem a discussão dos efeitos da abertura comercial sobre a desigualdade.
Resumo:
Wage inequality has increased substantially in Argentina during the nineties. At the same time during this decade Argentina has gone through a rapid and deep process of trade liberalization. In this paper we try to associate both phenomena. In particular, we attempt to answer the following question: Did trade liberalization play any role in shaping the argentine wage structure during the period studied? Specifically, we test whether those sectors where import penetration deepened are also the sectors where, ceteris paribus, a higher increase in wage inequality has taken place. We fmd evidence that supports this hypothesis.
Resumo:
This paper argues that changes in the returns to occupational tasks have contributed to changes in the wage distribution over the last three decades. Using Current Population Survey (CPS) data, we first show that the 1990s polarization of wages is explained by changes in wage setting between and within occupations, which are well captured by tasks measures linked to technological change and offshorability. Using a decomposition based on Firpo, Fortin, and Lemieux (2009), we find that technological change and deunionization played a central role in the 1980s and 1990s, while offshorability became an important factor from the 1990s onwards.
Resumo:
A desigualdade salarial, especialmente a resultante da discriminação contra negros e mulheres no mercado de trabalho, é um componente importante da elevada concentração de renda da economia brasileira. Ao contrário da grande maioria dos trabalhos já desenvolvidos nesta área, este trabalho não adota a hipótese de que os efeitos de atributos determinantes do salário são constantes e idênticos para os indivíduos ao longo da distribuição de renda. São estimadas as estruturas salariais para cada percentil da distribuição salarial para homens brancos, homens negros, mulheres brancas e mulheres negras utilizando a técnica de decomposição contrafactual por regressões quantílicas, proposta por Koenker e Bassett (1978) e desenvolvida por Machado e Mata (2004). Isto proporciona uma compreensão mais detalhada e abrangente dos fatores que determinam a remuneração do trabalho para diferentes níveis de renda e fornece uma medida mais completa do grau de discriminação contra os negros e mulheres no mercado de trabalho ao longo da distribuição salarial. Para os três grupos, a discriminação é crescente em relação à posição na distribuição salarial, indicando a dificuldade de se atingir posições melhor remuneradas no mercado de trabalho por parte de mulheres e negros. A discriminação afeta principalmente as mulheres negras, seguidas das mulheres brancas e dos homens negros. Para os homens negros, a discriminação é baixa entre os mais pobres e cresce nos níveis mais altos da distribuição. As mulheres brancas sofrem ao longo de toda a distribuição com maior efeito entre os 15% mais ricos. As mulheres negras sofrem com a discriminação por cor e gênero, estando assim na pior situação entre os grupos. A remuneração da educação estimada para os quatro grupos indica ganhos crescentes conforme a posição na distribuição salarial ampliando a desigualdade salarial intra-grupo, adicionalmente, observa-se uma desvalorização da educação dos negros de ambos os sexos na determinação salarial e que as mulheres sofrem algum tipo de discriminação no que diz respeito à educação apenas nos níveis salariais mais elevados. Os ganhos salariais obtidos com a equalização da escolaridade e formalização entre os grupos discriminados e os homens brancos indicam que, no caso da educação, homens e mulheres negros teriam ganhos ao longo de toda a distribuição, com ênfase entre os mais ricos. Para a formalização, a população nos decis inferiores da distribuição salarial seria a principal beneficiada.
Resumo:
Esse trabalho analisa o que aconteceu com a desigualdade salarial no Brasil nos anos de 1981 a 2009. Procuramos descobrir o papel que as características observáveis e os retornos a essas desempenha nas alterações da distribuição salarial. Usamos quatro variáveis explicativas: educação, experiência, atividade econômica do trabalho e região geográ ca em que mora. A partir de RIF - regressions descobrimos o papel de cada uma dessas covariadas individualmente. Nossos resultados mostram que houve uma signi cativa queda da desigualdade salarial no Brasil a partir do nal da década de 1990, explicada principalmente por mudanças nos retornos das características.
Resumo:
This paper examines the evolution of wage inequality in Brazil in the 1980s and 1990s . It tries to investigate the role played by changing economic returns to education and to experience over this period together with the evolution of within-group inequality. It applies a quantile regression approach on grouped data to the Brazilian case. Results using repeated cross-sections of a Brazilian annual household survey indicate that : i) Male wage dispersion remained basically constant overall in the 1980's and 1990' s but has increased substantially within education and age groups. ii) Returns to experience increased significantly over this period, with the rise concentrated on the iliterate/primary school group iii) Returns to college education have risen over time, whereas return to intermediate and high-school education have fallen iv) The apparent rise in within-group inequality seems to be the result of a fall in real wages, since the difference in wage leveIs has dec1ined substantially over the period, especially within the high-educated sample. v) Returns to experience rise with education. vi) Returns to education rise over the life-cycle. vii) Wage inequality increases over the life-cycle. The next step i~ this research will try to conciliate all these stylised facts.
Resumo:
This paper analyzes both the levels and evolution of wage inequality in the Brazilian formal labor market using administrative data from the Brazilian Ministry of Labor (RAIS) from 1994 to 2009. After the covariance structure of the log of real weekly wages is estimated and the variance of the log of real weekly wages is decomposed into its permanent and transitory components, we verify that nearly 60% of the inequality within age and education groups is explained by the permanent component, i.e., by time-invariant individual productive characteristics. During this period, wage inequality decreased by 29%. In the rst years immediately after the macroeconomic stabilization (1994
Resumo:
This paper investigates the income inequality generated by a jobsearch process when di§erent cohorts of homogeneous workers are allowed to have di§erent degrees of impatience. Using the fact the average wage under the invariant Markovian distribution is a decreasing function of the discount factor (Cysne (2004, 2006)), I show that the Lorenz curve and the between-cohort Gini coe¢ cient of income inequality can be easily derived in this case. An example with arbitrary measures regarding the wage o§ers and the distribution of time preferences among cohorts provides some insights into how much income inequality can be generated, and into how it varies as a function of the probability of unemployment and of the probability that the worker does not Önd a job o§er each period.
Resumo:
This paper explores the use of an intertemporal job-search model in the investigation of within-cohort and between-cohort income inequality, the latter being generated by the heterogeneity of time preferences among cohorts of homogenous workers and the former by the cross-sectional turnover in the job market. It also offers an alternative explanation for the empirically-documented negative correlation between time preference and labor income. Under some speciÖc distributions regarding wage offers and time preferences, we show how the within-cohort and between-cohort Gini coe¢ cients of income distribution can be calculated, and how they vary as a function of the parameters of the model.
Resumo:
Several empirical studies in the literature have documented the existence of a positive correlation between income inequalitiy and unemployment. I provide a theoretical framework under which this correlation can be better understood. The analysis is based on a dynamic job search under uncertainty. I start by proving the uniqueness of a stationary distribution of wages in the economy. Drawing upon this distribution, I provide a general expression for the Gini coefficient of income inequality. The expression has the advantage of not requiring a particular specification of the distribution of wage offers. Next, I show how the Gini coefficient varies as a function of the parameters of the model, and how it can be expected to be positively correlated with the rate of unemployment. Two examples are offered. The first, of a technical nature, to show that the convergence of the measures implied by the underlying Markov process can fail in some cases. The second, to provide a quantitative assessment of the model and of the mechanism linking unemployment and inequality.
Resumo:
By mixing together inequalities based on cyclical variables, such as unemployment, and on structural variables, such as education, usual measurements of income inequality add objects of a di§erent economic nature. Since jobs are not acquired or lost as fast as education or skills, this aggreagation leads to a loss of relavant economic information. Here I propose a di§erent procedure for the calculation of inequality. The procedure uses economic theory to construct an inequality measure of a long-run character, the calculation of which can be performed, though, with just one set of cross-sectional observations. Technically, the procedure is based on the uniqueness of the invariant distribution of wage o§ers in a job-search model. Workers should be pre-grouped by the distribution of wage o§ers they see, and only between-group inequalities should be considered. This construction incorporates the fact that the average wages of all workers in the same group tend to be equalized by the continuous turnover in the job market.
Resumo:
In this paper I devise a new channel by means of which the (empirically documented) positive correlation between ináation and income inequality can be understood. Available empirical evidence reveals that ináation increases wage dispersion. For this reason, the higher the ináation rate, the higher turns out to be the beneÖt, for a worker, of making additional draws from the distribution of wages, before deciding whether to accept or reject a job o§er. Assuming that some workers have less access to information (wage o§ers) than others, I show that the Gini coe¢ cient of income distribution turns out to be an increasing function of the wage dispersion and, consequently, of the rate of ináation. Two examples are provided to illustrate the mechanism.
Resumo:
This paper investigates the income inequality generated by a jobsearch process when di§erent cohorts of homogeneous workers are allowed to have di§erent degrees of impatience. Using the fact the average wage under the invariant Markovian distribution is a decreasing function of the time preference (Cysne (2004)), I show that the Lorenz curve and the between-cohort Gini coe¢ cient of income inequality can be easily derived in this case. An example with arbitrary measures regarding the wage o§ers and the distribution of time preferences among cohorts provides some quantitative insights into how much income inequality can be generated, and into how it varies as a function of the probability of unemployment and of the probability that the worker does not Önd a job o§er each period.
Resumo:
We live in an unjust world characterized by economic inequality. No liberal theory of justice is able to justify it. Inequality is not “solved” with equality of opportunity or meritocracy. Nor by the socialist and republican critique. The poor will have to count with them and with democracy to make social progress reality. In their political struggle, they will face one economic constraint: the expected profit rate must remain attractive to business investors. Yet, giving that technological progress in increasingly capital-saving, this economic constraint does not obstruct that wages grow above the productivity rate and inequality is reduced. What really is an obstacle to social justice in the rich countries is, on one hand, the power that capitalist rentiers retain and financists acquired, and, on the other, the competition originated in low wage countries.