Do Brazilian courts contribute to the implementation of the right to housing?

The objective of this paper is to try to understand the Brazilian’s Courts role in the implementation of the Right to Housing. In order to do that, I analyzed three lawsuits (Favela Olga Benario, Favela Fiat/Vila Esperança and Pinheirinho I) in which the Right to Housing collide with the Right to Private Property. I claim that in spite of the adoption of the Social Function of the Ownership Principle and the formal inclusion of the Right to Housing among social rights protected by the Constitution, Brazilians Courts adopt a very conservative conception of the Right to Private Property and because of that, they tend not to enforce the Right to Housing.

O direito fundamental à liberdade de consciência em discussão: ética e experimentação didático-científica em animais nas universidades

O reconhecimento pela Ciência de que os animais são seres sencientes e conscientes propiciou o surgimento das teorias morais que chamamos de direito animal, bem como o desenvolvimento de alternativas técnicas ao uso de animais, sobretudo na educação. Neste cenário, estudantes de biomédicas se recusam à realização de experimentação animal, baseados no direito à objeção de consciência protegido pela Constituição da República Federativa Brasileira de 1988, que, contudo, tem sido negado pelos tribunais. Este trabalho tem por objetivo, através do estudo de casos, apresentar que as premissas e os fundamentos em que se apoiam os tribunais para negar a objeção de consciência são questionáveis do ponto de vista jurídico, tendo em vista o sentido da objeção de consciência e hermenêutico, pela aplicação do princípio da força normativa da constituição e do princípio da proporcionalidade.

Courts as healthcare policy-makers: the problem, the responses to the problem and problems in the responses

This article starts by analysing healthcare litigation in Brazil by means of a literature review of articles that contribute with empirical findings on this phenomenon. Based on this review, I argue that health care litigation in Brazil makes the public health system less fair and rational. In the second part of this article, I discuss the three most overarching responses to control the level of litigation and its impact on the public health system: (i) the public hearing held by the Supreme Federal Court and the criteria the court established thereafter; (ii) the recommendations by the National Council of Justice aimed at building courts’ institutional capacity; and (iii) the enactment of the Federal Law 12.401/11, which created a new health technology assessment system. I argue that latter is the best response because it keeps the substantive decisions on the allocation of healthcare resources in the institution that is in the best position to make them. Moreover, this legislation will make the decisions about provision of health treatments more explicit, making easier for courts to control the procedure and the reasons for these decisions.