Exploratory semiparametric analysis of two-dimensional diffusions in finance

We examine bivariate extensions of Aït-Sahalia’s approach to the estimation of univariate diffusions. Our message is that extending his idea to a bivariate setting is not straightforward. In higher dimensions, as opposed to the univariate case, the elements of the Itô and Fokker-Planck representations do not coincide; and, even imposing sensible assumptions on the marginal drifts and volatilities is not sufficient to obtain direct generalisations. We develop exploratory estimation and testing procedures, by parametrizing the drifts of both component processes and setting restrictions on the terms of either the Itô or the Fokker-Planck covariance matrices. This may lead to highly nonlinear ordinary differential equations, where the definition of boundary conditions is crucial. For the methods developed, the Fokker-Planck representation seems more tractable than the Itô’s. Questions for further research include the design of regularity conditions on the time series dependence in the data, the kernels actually used and the bandwidths, to obtain asymptotic properties for the estimators proposed. A particular case seems promising: “causal bivariate models” in which only one of the diffusions contributes to the volatility of the other. Hedging strategies which estimate separately the univariate diffusions at stake may thus be improved.

Forecasting accuracy and estimation uncertainty using VAR models with short- and long-term economic restrictions: a Monte-Carlo study

Using vector autoregressive (VAR) models and Monte-Carlo simulation methods we investigate the potential gains for forecasting accuracy and estimation uncertainty of two commonly used restrictions arising from economic relationships. The Örst reduces parameter space by imposing long-term restrictions on the behavior of economic variables as discussed by the literature on cointegration, and the second reduces parameter space by imposing short-term restrictions as discussed by the literature on serial-correlation common features (SCCF). Our simulations cover three important issues on model building, estimation, and forecasting. First, we examine the performance of standard and modiÖed information criteria in choosing lag length for cointegrated VARs with SCCF restrictions. Second, we provide a comparison of forecasting accuracy of Ötted VARs when only cointegration restrictions are imposed and when cointegration and SCCF restrictions are jointly imposed. Third, we propose a new estimation algorithm where short- and long-term restrictions interact to estimate the cointegrating and the cofeature spaces respectively. We have three basic results. First, ignoring SCCF restrictions has a high cost in terms of model selection, because standard information criteria chooses too frequently inconsistent models, with too small a lag length. Criteria selecting lag and rank simultaneously have a superior performance in this case. Second, this translates into a superior forecasting performance of the restricted VECM over the VECM, with important improvements in forecasting accuracy ñreaching more than 100% in extreme cases. Third, the new algorithm proposed here fares very well in terms of parameter estimation, even when we consider the estimation of long-term parameters, opening up the discussion of joint estimation of short- and long-term parameters in VAR models.

Modelo Nelson-Siegel dinâmico da estrutura a termo da taxa de juros com fatores exógenos macroeconômicos: uma aplicação ao mercado brasileiro

A tradicional representação da estrutura a termo das taxas de juros em três fatores latentes (nível, inclinação e curvatura) teve sua formulação original desenvolvida por Charles R. Nelson e Andrew F. Siegel em 1987. Desde então, diversas aplicações vêm sendo desenvolvidas por acadêmicos e profissionais de mercado tendo como base esta classe de modelos, sobretudo com a intenção de antecipar movimentos nas curvas de juros. Ao mesmo tempo, estudos recentes como os de Diebold, Piazzesi e Rudebusch (2010), Diebold, Rudebusch e Aruoba (2006), Pooter, Ravazallo e van Dijk (2010) e Li, Niu e Zeng (2012) sugerem que a incorporação de informação macroeconômica aos modelos da ETTJ pode proporcionar um maior poder preditivo. Neste trabalho, a versão dinâmica do modelo Nelson-Siegel, conforme proposta por Diebold e Li (2006), foi comparada a um modelo análogo, em que são incluídas variáveis exógenas macroeconômicas. Em paralelo, foram testados dois métodos diferentes para a estimação dos parâmetros: a tradicional abordagem em dois passos (Two-Step DNS), e a estimação com o Filtro de Kalman Estendido, que permite que os parâmetros sejam estimados recursivamente, a cada vez que uma nova informação é adicionada ao sistema. Em relação aos modelos testados, os resultados encontrados mostram-se pouco conclusivos, apontando uma melhora apenas marginal nas estimativas dentro e fora da amostra quando as variáveis exógenas são incluídas. Já a utilização do Filtro de Kalman Estendido mostrou resultados mais consistentes quando comparados ao método em dois passos para praticamente todos os horizontes de tempo estudados.

Bounds on policy relevant parameters with discrete policy variation

When estimating policy parameters, also known as treatment effects, the assignment to treatment mechanism almost always causes endogeneity and thus bias many of these policy parameters estimates. Additionally, heterogeneity in program impacts is more likely to be the norm than the exception for most social programs. In situations where these issues are present, the Marginal Treatment Effect (MTE) parameter estimation makes use of an instrument to avoid assignment bias and simultaneously to account for heterogeneous effects throughout individuals. Although this parameter is point identified in the literature, the assumptions required for identification may be strong. Given that, we use weaker assumptions in order to partially identify the MTE, i.e. to stablish a methodology for MTE bounds estimation, implementing it computationally and showing results from Monte Carlo simulations. The partial identification we perfom requires the MTE to be a monotone function over the propensity score, which is a reasonable assumption on several economics' examples, and the simulation results shows it is possible to get informative even in restricted cases where point identification is lost. Additionally, in situations where estimated bounds are not informative and the traditional point identification is lost, we suggest a more generic method to point estimate MTE using the Moore-Penrose Pseudo-Invese Matrix, achieving better results than traditional methods.